IELTS Writing Task 2: Expert Sample Essays on Government Regulation of Unhealthy Food Sales

The topic of government regulation of unhealthy food sales is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on an analysis of past IELTS exams and current trends, this subject has a high …

Government Regulating Unhealthy Food

The topic of government regulation of unhealthy food sales is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on an analysis of past IELTS exams and current trends, this subject has a high probability of appearing in future tests. Let’s explore this topic through sample essays and in-depth analysis to help you prepare effectively for your IELTS Writing Task 2.

Analyzing the Topic

Government Regulating Unhealthy FoodGovernment Regulating Unhealthy Food

The question of whether governments should regulate the sale of unhealthy food touches on several important aspects:

  1. Public health concerns
  2. Individual freedom of choice
  3. Economic implications for food industries
  4. Government responsibility and intervention

This topic allows candidates to showcase their ability to discuss complex societal issues, balancing different perspectives and providing well-reasoned arguments.

Sample Question

Let’s examine a typical IELTS Writing Task 2 question on this topic:

Some people believe that governments should ban the sale of unhealthy food items to tackle rising obesity rates. Others think that individuals should have the freedom to choose what they eat. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay Sample 1: Band 8-9 Level

In recent years, the debate over government intervention in food choices has intensified, with obesity rates soaring globally. While some advocate for strict governmental control over unhealthy food sales, others champion individual liberty in dietary decisions. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Proponents of government regulation argue that obesity is a public health crisis that demands immediate action. They contend that by restricting access to unhealthy foods, authorities can significantly reduce obesity rates and associated health problems. For instance, countries like Mexico have successfully implemented taxes on sugary drinks, leading to decreased consumption and improved public health outcomes. Moreover, advocates argue that food companies often prioritize profits over health, necessitating government intervention to protect vulnerable consumers, particularly children.

On the other hand, those opposing such regulations emphasize the importance of personal freedom. They argue that dietary choices are inherently personal and that government interference infringes on individual rights. This perspective suggests that education and awareness campaigns are more effective and less intrusive methods of promoting healthy eating habits. Furthermore, critics of regulation point out that defining “unhealthy” food can be subjective and potentially lead to overreach in government control.

In my opinion, while I recognize the importance of personal freedom, I believe that some level of government regulation is necessary to address the obesity epidemic. However, I advocate for a balanced approach that combines moderate regulation with comprehensive education programs. For example, governments could implement clear labeling requirements and restrict marketing of unhealthy foods to children, while simultaneously investing in public health education. This strategy respects individual choice while creating an environment that encourages healthier decisions.

In conclusion, the issue of regulating unhealthy food sales is complex, involving a delicate balance between public health and personal liberty. While complete bans may be too extreme, thoughtful and moderate government intervention, coupled with education, can effectively promote healthier eating habits without excessively limiting individual freedom.

(Word count: 309)

Analysis of Band 8-9 Essay

This essay demonstrates several key features that contribute to its high band score:

  1. Clear structure: The essay follows a logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both views, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points and presents a balanced opinion.

  2. Coherent arguments: Each paragraph presents a cohesive argument with relevant examples and explanations.

  3. Sophisticated vocabulary: The essay uses a range of advanced vocabulary accurately, such as “intensified,” “champion,” “contend,” and “intrusive.”

  4. Complex sentence structures: The writer employs a variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences with multiple clauses.

  5. Balanced view: The essay presents both sides of the argument fairly before offering a nuanced personal opinion.

  6. Relevant examples: The writer provides specific examples, such as Mexico’s sugar tax, to support the arguments.

  7. Clear position: The conclusion clearly states the writer’s position while acknowledging the complexity of the issue.

Essay Sample 2: Band 6-7 Level

The question of whether governments should ban unhealthy food to reduce obesity is a topic of much debate. Some people think it’s a good idea, while others believe in personal choice. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who support government bans on unhealthy food argue that it’s necessary for public health. They say that obesity is a big problem and that many people can’t control their eating habits. By banning unhealthy foods, the government can help people make better choices. For example, if there are fewer fast food restaurants, people might eat healthier meals at home more often.

On the other hand, many people believe that we should be free to choose what we eat. They argue that it’s not the government’s job to tell us what to eat, and that banning food limits our personal freedom. They also say that education about healthy eating is more important than bans. If people understand the effects of unhealthy food, they can make better choices on their own.

In my opinion, I think a complete ban on unhealthy food is too extreme. However, I believe the government should take some action to help people eat better. For instance, they could make rules about showing calorie information on menus or limit advertising of junk food to children. At the same time, they should focus on educating people about nutrition and healthy lifestyles.

In conclusion, while banning unhealthy food might seem like a quick solution to obesity, it’s not the best approach. A combination of some regulations and better education about healthy eating is a more balanced way to address this problem.

(Word count: 276)

Analysis of Band 6-7 Essay

This essay demonstrates several characteristics typical of a Band 6-7 level:

  1. Clear structure: The essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs addressing both views, and a conclusion.

  2. Basic arguments: The essay presents main ideas for both perspectives but lacks the depth and sophistication of higher band essays.

  3. Simple vocabulary: The vocabulary used is generally appropriate but lacks the range and precision of higher band essays.

  4. Limited sentence variety: While there is some variation in sentence structure, it’s not as diverse as in higher band essays.

  5. Personal opinion: The writer expresses a personal view, but it could be more fully developed.

  6. Basic examples: The essay includes some examples, but they are more general compared to the specific examples in higher band essays.

  7. Coherence: The essay is generally coherent, with ideas flowing logically from one to the next.

Key Vocabulary

Here are some key vocabulary items from the essays, along with their definitions and parts of speech:

  1. Intervention (noun) /ˌɪntərˈvenʃən/: The action of becoming involved in a situation to improve it or prevent it from getting worse.

  2. Advocate (verb) /ˈædvəkeɪt/: To publicly support or recommend a particular cause or policy.

  3. Implement (verb) /ˈɪmplɪment/: To put a plan or system into operation.

  4. Intrusive (adjective) /ɪnˈtruːsɪv/: Causing disruption or annoyance through being unwelcome or uninvited.

  5. Epidemic (noun) /ˌepɪˈdemɪk/: A widespread occurrence of an infectious disease in a community at a particular time.

  6. Infringe (verb) /ɪnˈfrɪndʒ/: To actively break the terms of a law or agreement.

  7. Overreach (noun) /ˌəʊvəˈriːtʃ/: The action of trying to do more than one’s ability allows.

  8. Nuanced (adjective) /ˈnjuːɑːnst/: Characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression.

Conclusion

The topic of government regulation of unhealthy food sales is a complex and relevant issue for IELTS Writing Task 2. By studying these sample essays and understanding the key features that contribute to different band scores, you can improve your own writing skills. Remember to practice writing your own essays on this topic, focusing on clear structure, coherent arguments, and appropriate use of vocabulary.

For further practice, consider writing essays on related topics such as:

  1. The role of education in promoting healthy eating habits
  2. The impact of food advertising on consumer choices
  3. The effectiveness of sugar taxes in reducing obesity rates

Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section below. This active engagement will help you refine your writing skills and prepare effectively for your IELTS exam.