IELTS Writing Task 2: Should Governments Regulate Sugary Drinks to Combat Obesity? (Sample Essays for Band 6-9)

The topic of government regulation on sugary drinks to combat obesity has been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on analysis of past IELTS exams and current global health trends, this …

Government Regulation of Sugary Drinks

The topic of government regulation on sugary drinks to combat obesity has been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on analysis of past IELTS exams and current global health trends, this topic is likely to appear frequently in future tests. Let’s explore this subject through sample essays for different band scores, along with detailed analysis to help you improve your IELTS writing skills.

Analyzing the Question

Some people think that governments should regulate the sale of sugary drinks to combat obesity. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

This question asks for your opinion on government intervention in the sale of sugary drinks as a means to fight obesity. Key points to consider:

  1. The main issue: Obesity and its relation to sugary drinks
  2. The proposed solution: Government regulation
  3. Your task: Agree or disagree, and to what extent

Remember to address both parts of the question: the regulation of sugary drinks and its potential impact on obesity.

Government Regulation of Sugary DrinksGovernment Regulation of Sugary Drinks

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Obesity has become a global health crisis, and many argue that governments should take an active role in combating this issue by regulating the sale of sugary beverages. I strongly agree with this proposition, as I believe it is a necessary step towards improving public health and reducing the economic burden of obesity-related diseases.

Firstly, government regulation of sugary drinks can significantly impact consumption patterns. By implementing measures such as higher taxes on sugary beverages or restricting their availability in certain locations like schools, governments can discourage excessive consumption. For example, in Mexico, a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages led to a 12% reduction in purchases within a year of implementation. This demonstrates the potential effectiveness of such policies in altering consumer behavior.

Moreover, government intervention can help address the information asymmetry between consumers and beverage manufacturers. Many people are unaware of the high sugar content in these drinks and their potential health risks. Mandatory clear labeling and public health campaigns can educate consumers, enabling them to make more informed choices. For instance, the UK’s traffic light labeling system has helped consumers quickly identify healthier options, leading to a shift towards lower-sugar alternatives.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge that regulation alone is not a panacea for obesity. A comprehensive approach that includes promoting physical activity, improving access to healthy foods, and enhancing nutrition education is necessary. Government regulation of sugary drinks should be part of a broader strategy to create a healthier food environment.

Critics may argue that such regulations infringe on personal freedom and corporate rights. While this concern is valid, I believe that the government’s responsibility to protect public health outweighs these considerations, especially given the severe health and economic consequences of the obesity epidemic. Furthermore, regulations do not ban sugary drinks outright but aim to create a more balanced marketplace where healthier choices are more accessible and attractive.

In conclusion, I strongly support government regulation of sugary drinks as a crucial step in combating obesity. While it is not a standalone solution, it can significantly contribute to creating a healthier society by influencing consumer behavior and increasing awareness of the health risks associated with excessive sugar consumption. The potential benefits to public health and the economy far outweigh the limitations on personal choice and corporate interests.

(Word count: 369)

Analysis of Band 8-9 Essay

This essay demonstrates excellent qualities that align with Band 8-9 criteria:

  1. Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position with a fully developed response.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Each paragraph has a central topic, and linking words are used effectively.

  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately. Examples include “information asymmetry,” “panacea,” and “comprehensive approach.”

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy. Complex sentences are used effectively, such as “While this concern is valid, I believe that the government’s responsibility to protect public health outweighs these considerations.”

  5. Development of Ideas: Each main point is well-developed with relevant examples and explanations, demonstrating in-depth understanding of the issue.

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

Obesity is a big problem in many countries today, and some people think the government should control the sale of sugary drinks to help solve this issue. I partially agree with this idea because while it might help, there are also some problems with it.

On one hand, government control of sugary drinks could be good for people’s health. If drinks with a lot of sugar are more expensive or harder to buy, people might drink less of them. This could help reduce obesity because sugary drinks have many calories that can make people gain weight. For example, if schools don’t sell soda, children might choose healthier drinks instead.

Also, if the government makes rules about sugary drinks, it can help people understand how much sugar they are drinking. Many people don’t know how much sugar is in their drinks. If drink companies have to put clear labels on their products, people can make better choices about what they drink.

However, there are some problems with government control of sugary drinks. Some people might feel that the government is trying to control their personal choices. They might think it’s not fair to make sugary drinks more expensive or harder to buy. Also, drink companies might lose money if people buy fewer of their products.

Another issue is that controlling sugary drinks alone might not be enough to solve the obesity problem. People can still eat unhealthy food or not exercise enough. The government would need to do more than just control drinks to really help people be healthier.

In conclusion, I think government control of sugary drinks could help with obesity, but it’s not a perfect solution. It might make people healthier, but it could also cause some problems. The government should think carefully about how to balance these issues if they want to control sugary drinks.

(Word count: 309)

Analysis of Band 6-7 Essay

This essay demonstrates qualities that align with Band 6-7 criteria:

  1. Task Response: The essay addresses the main parts of the task and presents a clear position, though the response is not as fully developed as the Band 8-9 essay.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a clear overall progression, but the cohesion within and between paragraphs is not as strong as in higher band essays.

  3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, but lacks the sophistication and range seen in higher band essays. Some attempts at less common vocabulary are made, such as “partially agree.”

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is used, with generally good control. However, there is less variety and flexibility compared to higher band essays.

  5. Development of Ideas: Main ideas are present and supported, but the level of detail and explanation is not as extensive as in the Band 8-9 essay.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Obesity (noun) – /əʊˈbiːsɪti/ – the state of being very fat or overweight
  2. Regulate (verb) – /ˈreɡjʊleɪt/ – to control or supervise something by means of rules and regulations
  3. Consumption (noun) – /kənˈsʌmpʃən/ – the action of using up a resource
  4. Intervention (noun) – /ˌɪntəˈvenʃən/ – the action of intervening, especially by a government in a policy issue
  5. Panacea (noun) – /ˌpænəˈsɪə/ – a solution or remedy for all difficulties or diseases
  6. Comprehensive (adjective) – /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/ – including or dealing with all or nearly all elements or aspects of something
  7. Infringe (verb) – /ɪnˈfrɪndʒ/ – to actively break the terms of a law, agreement, etc.
  8. Asymmetry (noun) – /eɪˈsɪmətri/ – lack of equality or equivalence between parts or aspects of something
  9. Implementation (noun) – /ˌɪmplɪmenˈteɪʃən/ – the process of putting a decision or plan into effect
  10. Epidemic (noun) – /ˌepɪˈdemɪk/ – a widespread occurrence of an infectious disease in a community at a particular time

Conclusion

The topic of government regulation on sugary drinks to combat obesity is a complex and relevant issue for IELTS Writing Task 2. By analyzing the sample essays and understanding the key elements that contribute to different band scores, you can improve your own writing skills. Remember to address all parts of the question, develop your ideas with relevant examples, and use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures appropriate to your level.

For further practice, consider writing your own essay on this topic or related ones, such as:

  1. Should governments tax unhealthy foods to improve public health?
  2. To what extent should schools be responsible for teaching children about healthy eating habits?
  3. Some people believe that individuals, not governments, should take responsibility for their own health. Do you agree or disagree?

Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section below for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you refine your skills and prepare effectively for your IELTS Writing Task 2 exam.