IELTS Writing Task 2: Mastering Essays on Electric Vehicles as a Solution to Air Pollution – Sample Essays for Different Band Scores

Air pollution has become a pressing global concern, and the topic of electric vehicles as a potential solution has gained significant traction in recent years. This issue has also found its way into IELTS Writing …

Electric vehicles in a clean city

Air pollution has become a pressing global concern, and the topic of electric vehicles as a potential solution has gained significant traction in recent years. This issue has also found its way into IELTS Writing Task 2 prompts, reflecting its relevance in contemporary discussions. Based on an analysis of past IELTS exams and current trends, it’s highly likely that questions related to electric vehicles and their impact on air pollution will continue to appear in future tests.

Let’s examine a sample question that closely resembles those encountered in actual IELTS exams:

Some people believe that the widespread adoption of electric vehicles is the most effective solution to combat air pollution in cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Analyzing the Question

This question requires candidates to express their opinion on the effectiveness of electric vehicles in addressing urban air pollution. Key points to consider:

  1. The main topic is the relationship between electric vehicles and air pollution in cities.
  2. The question asks for your level of agreement or disagreement.
  3. You should discuss the effectiveness of electric vehicles compared to other potential solutions.
  4. Your response should be supported with relevant examples and explanations.

Electric vehicles in a clean cityElectric vehicles in a clean city

Sample Essays for Different Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay Sample

Air pollution in urban areas has become a critical issue, prompting many to advocate for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles as the primary solution. While I agree that electric vehicles can significantly contribute to reducing air pollution, I believe that a more comprehensive approach is necessary to effectively combat this complex problem.

Electric vehicles undoubtedly offer several advantages in the fight against air pollution. Firstly, they produce zero tailpipe emissions, which can dramatically reduce the concentration of harmful pollutants in city air. For instance, a study in Oslo, Norway, showed that the increase in electric vehicle usage led to a 30% reduction in nitrogen oxide levels over five years. Additionally, as electricity grids transition to renewable energy sources, the overall carbon footprint of electric vehicles continues to decrease, further enhancing their positive impact on air quality.

However, it is crucial to recognize that electric vehicles alone cannot solve all aspects of urban air pollution. One significant limitation is that they do not address particulate matter produced by tire and brake wear, which contributes substantially to air pollution. Moreover, the production of electric vehicles, particularly their batteries, still involves processes that can generate pollution. Therefore, while electric vehicles reduce direct emissions, they do not eliminate all sources of air pollution related to transportation.

A more holistic approach to combating air pollution in cities should include multiple strategies. Improving public transportation systems, promoting cycling and walking, implementing stricter industrial emission controls, and increasing urban green spaces are all essential components of a comprehensive solution. For example, cities like Copenhagen have successfully reduced air pollution by prioritizing bicycle infrastructure, resulting in 49% of all commutes being made by bike. Similarly, Singapore’s integrated approach, combining efficient public transport with strict vehicle quotas and green building initiatives, has led to significantly cleaner air despite rapid urbanization.

In conclusion, while I agree that electric vehicles play a crucial role in reducing air pollution, I believe they are part of a larger solution rather than the sole answer. A multi-faceted approach that addresses various sources of pollution and promotes sustainable urban planning is necessary to effectively tackle air pollution in cities. By combining the benefits of electric vehicles with other environmental initiatives, we can create cleaner, healthier urban environments for future generations.

(Word count: 377)

Band 6-7 Essay Sample

In recent years, many people have suggested that using electric cars on a large scale is the best way to solve air pollution problems in cities. I partially agree with this idea because while electric vehicles can help reduce pollution, they are not the only solution to this complex issue.

Electric cars have some clear benefits for reducing air pollution. First, they don’t produce exhaust fumes like regular cars do. This means they don’t release harmful gases directly into the air in cities. For example, in Beijing, where air pollution is a big problem, the government has encouraged people to use electric cars, and this has helped to improve air quality in some areas. Also, as countries start using more clean energy like solar and wind power, electric cars will become even better for the environment.

However, electric cars are not a perfect solution to air pollution. One problem is that making electric cars, especially their batteries, can cause pollution in factories. Another issue is that if the electricity used to charge these cars comes from coal power plants, it still contributes to air pollution, just in a different place. Additionally, electric cars don’t solve other sources of air pollution in cities, like factories or construction sites.

I believe that to really solve air pollution in cities, we need to use many different methods together. Along with promoting electric cars, cities should improve public transportation systems. For instance, London has both electric buses and a good subway system, which helps reduce the number of cars on the road. Cities can also create more green spaces and encourage people to walk or cycle for short trips. These methods, combined with electric cars, can make a bigger difference in reducing air pollution.

In conclusion, while I agree that electric cars can help reduce air pollution in cities, I don’t think they are the only or best solution by themselves. We need to use a combination of different approaches to effectively tackle the problem of air pollution in urban areas. This will create cleaner and healthier cities for everyone to live in.

(Word count: 339)

Band 5-6 Essay Sample

Many people think that using electric cars is the best way to stop air pollution in cities. I think this is partly true, but there are other things we need to do too.

Electric cars are good for reducing pollution in cities. They don’t make smoke like normal cars, so the air in cities can be cleaner. For example, in my city, we can see more electric cars now, and the air feels fresher. Also, electric cars are quiet, so they help reduce noise pollution too.

But electric cars are not perfect. They still need electricity, and if this comes from coal power plants, it still causes pollution. Making electric cars can also cause some pollution in factories. And electric cars don’t help with other things that make air dirty, like factories or building work in cities.

I think we need to do more than just use electric cars to clean the air in cities. We should also have better buses and trains so fewer people need to drive. Cities can plant more trees to help clean the air. People can also ride bicycles or walk for short trips instead of using cars.

In conclusion, I think electric cars can help make the air cleaner in cities, but they are not the only answer. We need to use many different ways to solve the problem of air pollution. If we do this, our cities will be healthier and nicer places to live.

(Word count: 228)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay Analysis

This essay demonstrates excellent task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a well-developed response with relevant, extended, and supported ideas.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively.
  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features. Rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A wide range of structures is used with full flexibility and accuracy. The majority of sentences are error-free.

Band 6-7 Essay Analysis

This essay shows a good attempt at addressing the task, with some areas for improvement:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses all parts of the task, although some parts are more fully covered than others.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a clear overall progression, but some paragraphs are better linked than others.
  3. Lexical Resource: An adequate range of vocabulary is used for the task, with some attempts at less common vocabulary.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used, with some errors that do not impede communication.

Band 5-6 Essay Analysis

This essay demonstrates a modest attempt at the task, with several areas needing improvement:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses the task in a general way, but the format is simple, and ideas lack development.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The overall structure is evident, but paragraphing is not always logical, and cohesive devices are limited.
  3. Lexical Resource: A limited range of vocabulary is used, with some repetition and errors in word choice.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Sentence structures are simple with frequent errors, though the meaning is generally clear.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Widespread adoption (noun phrase) – /ˈwʌɪdspred əˈdɒpʃən/ – extensive use or application of something
  2. Combat (verb) – /ˈkɒmbæt/ – to fight against or oppose
  3. Tailpipe emissions (noun phrase) – /ˈteɪlpaɪp ɪˈmɪʃənz/ – pollutants emitted from a vehicle’s exhaust system
  4. Carbon footprint (noun phrase) – /ˈkɑːbən ˈfʊtprɪnt/ – the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere as a result of activities
  5. Particulate matter (noun phrase) – /pɑːˈtɪkjʊlət ˈmætə/ – tiny particles of solid or liquid suspended in the air
  6. Holistic approach (noun phrase) – /həʊˈlɪstɪk əˈprəʊtʃ/ – dealing with or treating the whole of something rather than just a part
  7. Urbanization (noun) – /ˌɜːbənaɪˈzeɪʃən/ – the process of making an area more urban
  8. Multi-faceted (adjective) – /ˌmʌltiˈfæsɪtɪd/ – having many different aspects or features

Conclusion

The topic of electric vehicles as a solution to air pollution is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on related themes such as:

  1. The role of government in promoting electric vehicle adoption
  2. Balancing economic growth with environmental protection in developing countries
  3. The impact of personal transportation choices on climate change

Remember to structure your essays clearly, use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, and support your arguments with relevant examples. We encourage you to practice writing an essay on the given topic and share it in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active practice is an excellent way to improve your IELTS writing skills and prepare for the exam.