The topic of banning single-use plastics has become increasingly prevalent in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on recent trends and the growing global concern for environmental issues, it’s highly likely that this theme will continue to appear in future tests. Let’s explore a sample question that closely resembles those seen in actual IELTS exams and analyze how to approach it effectively.
Banning single-use plastics
Analyzing the Question
Some people believe that governments should ban single-use plastics to protect the environment. Others think there are better ways to address environmental issues. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This question follows a classic IELTS Writing Task 2 format, asking you to discuss two contrasting viewpoints and provide your personal stance. The topic centers on the debate between banning single-use plastics and exploring alternative environmental solutions. Let’s break down the key elements:
- View 1: Governments should ban single-use plastics
- View 2: There are better ways to address environmental issues
- Your task: Discuss both perspectives and share your opinion
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
In recent years, the environmental impact of single-use plastics has become a pressing global concern. While some advocate for a complete government-imposed ban on these products, others argue that alternative approaches might be more effective in addressing environmental issues. This essay will examine both viewpoints before presenting my own perspective on this complex matter.
Proponents of banning single-use plastics argue that such a measure would significantly reduce pollution and protect ecosystems. They contend that a government-mandated prohibition would force industries and consumers to adopt more sustainable alternatives, leading to an immediate and substantial decrease in plastic waste. Moreover, a ban could catalyze innovation in eco-friendly materials and packaging solutions, fostering a more environmentally conscious society.
On the other hand, those who oppose an outright ban suggest that there are more nuanced and potentially more effective ways to tackle environmental issues. They propose that a combination of education, incentives for sustainable practices, and improved recycling infrastructure could yield better long-term results without causing economic disruption. Additionally, they argue that some single-use plastics serve essential purposes in medical and food safety applications, making a complete ban impractical.
In my opinion, while banning single-use plastics could have immediate positive effects, a more comprehensive and balanced approach is necessary to address environmental challenges effectively. I believe that governments should implement a phased reduction of single-use plastics, coupled with investments in research and development of sustainable alternatives. This strategy should be complemented by robust public education campaigns and economic incentives for businesses and consumers to adopt eco-friendly practices.
In conclusion, addressing the environmental impact of single-use plastics requires a multifaceted approach. While a ban could serve as a powerful tool, it should be part of a broader strategy that includes education, innovation, and incentives to create lasting change and foster a more sustainable future.
(Word count: 309)
Essay Analysis
This essay demonstrates several key features that contribute to its high band score (8-9):
Clear structure: The essay follows a logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both viewpoints, the writer’s opinion, and a conclusion.
Coherent arguments: Each paragraph presents a well-developed argument with supporting details and examples.
Advanced vocabulary: The essay uses sophisticated vocabulary and phrases such as “pressing global concern,” “catalyze innovation,” and “multifaceted approach.”
Complex sentence structures: The writer employs a variety of sentence structures, including complex and compound sentences.
Clear position: The writer’s opinion is clearly stated and well-supported with reasoning.
Cohesive devices: The essay uses appropriate linking words and phrases to ensure smooth transitions between ideas.
Task response: All parts of the question are fully addressed, including both viewpoints and the writer’s opinion.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
These days, many people are worried about the environment and how single-use plastics are causing problems. Some think the government should ban these plastics, while others believe there are better ways to help the environment. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Those who support banning single-use plastics say it would be good for the environment. They think that if the government makes it illegal to use these plastics, companies and people will have to find other ways to package things that don’t harm nature. This could help reduce pollution in our oceans and on land, which would be good for animals and plants.
However, some people disagree with banning single-use plastics. They believe that there are other ways to solve environmental problems that might work better. For example, they suggest teaching people about recycling and how to use less plastic. They also think that improving recycling systems and encouraging companies to use eco-friendly packaging could help without causing too many problems for businesses.
In my opinion, I think that banning single-use plastics completely might be too difficult to do right away. Instead, I believe that a mix of different approaches would work best. Governments could start by putting limits on some types of single-use plastics while also teaching people about the environment and helping companies find better alternatives. This way, we can reduce plastic use over time without causing too much trouble for everyone.
To conclude, while banning single-use plastics might help the environment, I think a combination of different methods would be more effective in solving environmental problems. By working together and using different strategies, we can make a positive change for our planet.
(Word count: 293)
Essay Analysis
This essay demonstrates features typical of a Band 6-7 score:
Adequate structure: The essay has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion, but the development of ideas is less sophisticated than the Band 8-9 essay.
Relevant arguments: Both viewpoints are discussed, and the writer’s opinion is presented, addressing the task requirements.
Simpler vocabulary: The language used is clear but less advanced than in the higher band essay. For example, “These days” instead of “In recent years.”
Less complex sentences: While there is some variety in sentence structure, it is not as consistently complex as in the Band 8-9 essay.
Clear position: The writer’s opinion is stated, but the supporting arguments are less developed.
Basic cohesive devices: The essay uses some linking words, but they are more basic and less varied than in the higher band essay.
Task response: All parts of the question are addressed, but with less depth and precision than in the Band 8-9 essay.
Key Vocabulary
Here are some important vocabulary items from the essays, along with their definitions and pronunciations:
Advocate (verb) /ˈædvəkeɪt/: To publicly support or recommend a particular cause or policy.
Catalyze (verb) /ˈkætəlaɪz/: To cause or accelerate a reaction or process.
Nuanced (adjective) /ˈnjuːɑːnst/: Characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression.
Infrastructure (noun) /ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/: The basic physical and organizational structures and facilities needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.
Multifaceted (adjective) /ˌmʌltiˈfæsɪtɪd/: Having many different aspects or features.
Incentives (noun) /ɪnˈsentɪvz/: Things that motivate or encourage someone to do something.
Eco-friendly (adjective) /ˈiːkəʊ ˈfrendli/: Not harmful to the environment.
Sustainable (adjective) /səˈsteɪnəbl/: Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level without depleting natural resources.
Prohibition (noun) /ˌprəʊɪˈbɪʃn/: The action of forbidding something, especially by law.
Comprehensive (adjective) /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/: Including or dealing with all or nearly all elements or aspects of something.
Conclusion
The issue of banning single-use plastics is a complex and relevant topic for IELTS Writing Task 2. To excel in your essay, focus on presenting balanced arguments, using sophisticated vocabulary, and clearly stating your opinion with supporting reasons. Practice writing essays on similar environmental topics, such as:
- The role of individual actions versus government policies in environmental protection
- The impact of technological advancements on solving environmental issues
- The balance between economic growth and environmental conservation
Remember to structure your essay well, use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures, and fully address all parts of the question. Feel free to practice writing an essay on this topic and share it in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active practice will help you improve your IELTS Writing skills and prepare you for success in the exam.