IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Government Regulation of Human Scientific Experimentation

Scientific experimentation on humans is a controversial topic that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2. This subject requires candidates to consider ethical, legal, and social implications, making it an excellent test of critical thinking …

Ethics in Scientific Experimentation

Scientific experimentation on humans is a controversial topic that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2. This subject requires candidates to consider ethical, legal, and social implications, making it an excellent test of critical thinking and argumentative skills. Based on past IELTS exams and current trends, we can expect this theme to continue appearing in future tests. Let’s explore a relevant question and analyze sample responses across different band scores.

Ethics in Scientific ExperimentationEthics in Scientific Experimentation

Analyzing the Question

Let’s examine a typical IELTS Writing Task 2 question on this topic:

Some people believe that scientific experiments on human beings should not be regulated by governments. Others feel that some government control is necessary. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This question requires you to:

  1. Discuss arguments for and against government regulation of scientific experiments on humans
  2. Present your own opinion on the matter
  3. Support your points with relevant examples and explanations

Now, let’s look at sample essays for different band scores, along with detailed analyses.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Scientific experimentation on human subjects is a contentious issue that raises numerous ethical questions. While some argue that such research should proceed unfettered by government oversight, others contend that regulatory control is essential. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Those who oppose government regulation of human experimentation often cite the potential for groundbreaking medical advancements. They argue that excessive bureaucratic control may impede scientific progress, potentially delaying life-saving treatments. Furthermore, they contend that scientists and research institutions have their own ethical guidelines and review boards, making government intervention redundant and potentially counterproductive.

On the other hand, proponents of government regulation emphasize the need to protect human rights and dignity. History has shown instances where unethical experiments have led to severe harm and exploitation of vulnerable populations. Government oversight can establish universal standards for informed consent, risk assessment, and participant safety. Moreover, regulations can ensure transparency and accountability in research practices, fostering public trust in scientific endeavors.

In my opinion, while scientific freedom is crucial for progress, some level of government regulation is necessary to safeguard human welfare. A balanced approach that combines clear ethical guidelines with flexibility for innovation would be ideal. Governments should collaborate with scientific communities to develop regulations that protect participants without stifling research. This could involve streamlined approval processes for low-risk studies while maintaining rigorous scrutiny for more invasive experiments.

In conclusion, the regulation of scientific experiments on humans requires a nuanced approach that balances scientific advancement with ethical considerations. By implementing thoughtful and adaptable regulatory frameworks, governments can foster an environment where scientific progress thrives without compromising human dignity and safety.

(Word count: 276)

Analysis of Band 8-9 Essay

This essay demonstrates excellence in several key areas:

  1. Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and clearly presenting a personal opinion.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively.

  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately. Complex ideas are expressed with precision.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay uses a variety of complex structures accurately. Errors are rare and do not impede communication.

  5. Critical Thinking: The essay demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the issue, presenting nuanced arguments and a balanced conclusion.

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The topic of government control over scientific experiments on humans is controversial. Some people think it should not be regulated, while others believe some control is needed. I will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who are against government regulation say that it can slow down important research. They think scientists should be free to do their work without interference. This could lead to new treatments for diseases being discovered faster. Also, they argue that scientists already have their own rules to follow.

On the other hand, people who support government control say it is necessary to protect people. There have been cases in the past where experiments hurt people. Government rules can make sure experiments are safe and that people agree to participate. It can also make sure the research is done fairly and openly.

I think that some government control is important. While scientific progress is good, we need to make sure it doesn’t harm people. However, the rules should not be too strict. They should allow scientists to do their work but also protect the rights of people involved in experiments.

In conclusion, both sides have valid points, but I believe a balance is needed. Government regulation can help protect people while still allowing important scientific research to continue.

(Word count: 218)

Analysis of Band 6-7 Essay

This essay demonstrates competence in several areas but lacks the sophistication of a higher band score:

  1. Task Response: The essay addresses all parts of the task, but the ideas could be more fully developed.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a clear overall progression, but the use of cohesive devices is sometimes mechanical.

  3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is adequate for the task, but there is less precision and sophistication compared to the Band 8-9 essay.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is used, with generally good control, though some errors are present.

  5. Critical Thinking: The essay presents relevant ideas but lacks the depth and nuance of the higher band essay.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Ethical considerations (noun phrase) – /ˈeθɪkəl kənˌsɪdəˈreɪʃənz/ – Moral principles that guide decision-making in research.

  2. Informed consent (noun phrase) – /ɪnˈfɔːmd kənˈsent/ – Agreement to participate in research after understanding all implications.

  3. Regulatory framework (noun phrase) – /ˈreɡjələtəri ˈfreɪmwɜːk/ – A system of regulations and guidelines governing a particular activity.

  4. Exploitation (noun) – /ˌeksplɔɪˈteɪʃən/ – The action of treating someone unfairly for one’s own benefit.

  5. Transparency (noun) – /trænsˈpærənsi/ – Openness and clarity in processes and communication.

  6. Accountability (noun) – /əˌkaʊntəˈbɪləti/ – The obligation to accept responsibility for one’s actions.

  7. Rigorous (adjective) – /ˈrɪɡərəs/ – Extremely thorough and careful.

  8. Nuanced (adjective) – /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ – Characterized by subtle differences or distinctions.

  9. Impede (verb) – /ɪmˈpiːd/ – To delay or prevent progress.

  10. Safeguard (verb) – /ˈseɪfɡɑːd/ – To protect from harm or damage.

In conclusion, the regulation of scientific experiments on humans is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of ethical, scientific, and social factors. As you prepare for your IELTS Writing Task 2, practice addressing similar topics that involve balancing different viewpoints and ethical considerations. You might encounter questions about genetic engineering, medical research ethics, or the role of science in society.

To improve your writing skills, try crafting your own essay on the topic discussed in this article. Feel free to share your practice essay in the comments section for feedback and discussion. Remember to apply the strategies and vocabulary outlined in this guide to enhance your performance in the IELTS Writing Task 2.

For more insights into ethical considerations in scientific research, you might find our article on the ethical considerations of genetic modification helpful in expanding your understanding of related topics.