IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Increasing Taxes for High-Income Earners (Band 6-9)

The topic of whether governments should increase taxes on high-income individuals is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2. Based on analysis of past exam papers and current socio-economic trends, this subject is likely to appear frequently in future tests. Let’s examine a specific question related to this topic and provide sample essays for different band scores.

Some people believe that governments should increase taxes on high-income individuals to reduce income inequality. Others argue that this approach may discourage economic growth. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analysis of the Question

This question requires candidates to:

1. Discuss the view that higher taxes on the wealthy can reduce income inequality
2. Examine the counterargument that such taxes may hinder economic growth
3. Provide their personal opinion on the matter

It’s crucial to address all parts of the question and provide a balanced discussion before stating your own stance.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Income inequality is a pressing issue in many countries, and the idea of increasing taxes on high earners as a solution has gained traction. While some argue that this approach can effectively reduce the wealth gap, others contend that it may impede economic progress. This essay will examine both perspectives before offering a personal viewpoint.

Proponents of higher taxes for the affluent argue that this measure can significantly reduce income disparity. They contend that by redistributing wealth through progressive taxation, governments can fund social programs and public services that benefit lower-income groups. For instance, increased tax revenue could be channeled into education, healthcare, and affordable housing initiatives, thereby improving the quality of life for less privileged citizens. Moreover, advocates argue that this approach promotes social cohesion and reduces the potential for social unrest stemming from extreme inequality.

Wealth Redistribution Through Taxes

On the other hand, critics of this tax policy warn that it may discourage economic growth. They argue that higher tax rates could disincentivize entrepreneurship and investment, as high-income individuals might be less motivated to expand their businesses or take financial risks. This could lead to reduced job creation and slower economic expansion. Furthermore, opponents contend that wealthy individuals might seek ways to avoid taxes, such as moving their assets offshore, which could ultimately result in lower tax revenues and a smaller tax base.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary to address income inequality while maintaining economic dynamism. While I believe that some increase in taxes for high-income earners is justified, it should be implemented carefully to avoid stifling economic growth. Governments should focus on closing tax loopholes and ensuring that the wealthy pay their fair share, rather than imposing excessively high rates that might drive capital away. Additionally, any increase in tax revenue should be transparently allocated to programs that promote equal opportunities and social mobility, such as education and skills training.

Impact of High Taxes on the Economy

In conclusion, the debate over taxing high-income individuals highlights the complex relationship between equality and economic growth. While higher taxes can potentially reduce income disparities, they must be carefully designed to avoid negative impacts on the economy. A nuanced approach that combines moderate tax increases with targeted social investments is likely to be the most effective strategy for addressing income inequality in the long term.

(Word count: 375)

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The question of whether governments should raise taxes on high-income earners to reduce income inequality is a complex issue. Some people think this is a good idea, while others believe it could harm economic growth. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who support higher taxes for rich people say it can help reduce the gap between rich and poor. They argue that by taking more money from wealthy individuals, the government can use this extra money to help those who are less fortunate. For example, the government could spend more on education, healthcare, and other social programs that benefit everyone, especially those with lower incomes. This could lead to a fairer society where everyone has better opportunities.

However, others worry that increasing taxes on high earners might slow down economic growth. They think that if rich people have to pay more taxes, they might not want to start new businesses or invest in existing ones. This could mean fewer jobs are created, and the economy might not grow as fast. Also, some wealthy people might try to avoid paying higher taxes by moving their money to other countries, which could actually reduce the amount of tax the government collects.

Balancing Taxes and Economic Growth

In my opinion, I think governments should try to find a balance between these two views. While it’s important to reduce income inequality, we also need to make sure the economy keeps growing. I believe that a moderate increase in taxes for very high earners could be helpful, as long as the extra money is used effectively to improve opportunities for everyone. At the same time, governments should be careful not to raise taxes so much that it discourages people from working hard and being successful.

To conclude, the issue of taxing high-income individuals is not simple, and there are valid arguments on both sides. Governments need to carefully consider how to reduce inequality without harming economic growth. A balanced approach that combines some tax increases with smart investments in social programs is probably the best way forward.

(Word count: 339)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay

This essay demonstrates the following characteristics of a high band score:

1. Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a well-developed response with relevant, extended, and supported ideas.
2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Uses a range of cohesive devices and paragraphing effectively.
3. Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features. Bold text highlights some examples of advanced vocabulary.
4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with flexibility and accuracy. Rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’.

Band 6-7 Essay

This essay demonstrates the following characteristics of a mid-range band score:

1. Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others. Presents relevant main ideas but some may be inadequately developed/unclear.
2. Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression. Uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical.
3. Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. Attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy. Makes some errors in spelling and/or word formation, but they do not impede communication.
4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

1. Income inequality (noun) – /ˈɪnkʌm ɪnɪˈkwɒlɪti/ – The extent to which income is distributed in an uneven manner among a population.

2. Progressive taxation (noun) – /prəˈɡresɪv tækˈseɪʃən/ – A tax system where the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases.

3. Redistribute (verb) – /ˌriːdɪˈstrɪbjuːt/ – To distribute again or differently, especially to achieve greater social equality.

4. Disincentivize (verb) – /ˌdɪsɪnˈsentɪvaɪz/ – To discourage or deter (someone) from doing something by removing the incentives.

5. Social cohesion (noun) – /ˈsəʊʃəl kəʊˈhiːʒən/ – The willingness of members of a society to cooperate with each other in order to survive and prosper.

6. Entrepreneurship (noun) – /ˌɒntrəprəˈnɜːʃɪp/ – The activity of setting up a business or businesses, taking on financial risks in the hope of profit.

7. Tax loophole (noun) – /tæks ˈluːphoʊl/ – A technicality that allows a person or business to avoid the scope of a law or restriction without directly violating the law.

8. Social mobility (noun) – /ˈsəʊʃəl məˈbɪlɪti/ – The ability of individuals or groups to move upward or downward in status based on wealth, occupation, education, or other social variables.

Conclusion

The topic of increasing taxes on high-income individuals to address income inequality is likely to remain relevant in future IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on related themes such as:

• The role of government in reducing economic disparities
• Balancing economic growth with social welfare
• The impact of taxation policies on different socio-economic groups
• Alternative approaches to addressing income inequality

Remember to structure your essays clearly, use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, and provide balanced arguments supported by relevant examples. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and further discussion. This active engagement will help you improve your writing skills and prepare more effectively for the IELTS exam.