IELTS Writing Task 2: Expert Sample Essays on Corporate Recycling Mandates (Band 7-8)

In recent years, the topic of corporate environmental responsibility has gained significant traction in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. The question of whether companies should be required to recycle has appeared multiple times, reflecting its …

IELTS Writing Task comparison of different band scores

In recent years, the topic of corporate environmental responsibility has gained significant traction in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. The question of whether companies should be required to recycle has appeared multiple times, reflecting its relevance in today’s eco-conscious world. This trend is likely to continue, given the growing global emphasis on sustainability and environmental protection. Let’s examine a recent IELTS Writing Task 2 question on this subject and explore how to craft high-scoring responses.

Some people think that companies should be required to recycle their waste products. Others believe it should be a voluntary decision. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analysis of the Question

This question presents a classic IELTS Writing Task 2 format – discussing two opposing views and providing a personal opinion. The topic revolves around corporate recycling, touching on themes of environmental responsibility, government regulation, and business autonomy. To answer this effectively, candidates must:

  1. Discuss arguments for mandatory corporate recycling
  2. Explore reasons for keeping recycling voluntary
  3. Present a balanced view of both sides
  4. Conclude with a well-reasoned personal opinion

Now, let’s examine two sample essays that address this question, targeting different band scores.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8)

In today’s environmentally conscious world, the debate over corporate recycling responsibilities has intensified. While some advocate for mandatory recycling programs, others argue for voluntary participation. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Proponents of obligatory corporate recycling argue that it is necessary to combat the growing environmental crisis. They contend that without legal requirements, many companies would prioritize profits over ecological concerns, leading to increased pollution and waste. Mandatory recycling would ensure a level playing field, preventing environmentally responsible firms from being at a competitive disadvantage. Moreover, it could stimulate innovation in recycling technologies and create new job opportunities in the green sector.

On the other hand, those favoring voluntary recycling emphasize the importance of corporate autonomy and market-driven solutions. They argue that forcing companies to recycle might lead to increased costs, potentially harming smaller businesses and raising prices for consumers. Additionally, they believe that consumer demand for eco-friendly products and services will naturally incentivize companies to adopt sustainable practices, including recycling, without the need for government intervention.

In my opinion, while I appreciate the arguments for voluntary participation, I believe that mandatory corporate recycling is necessary to address our urgent environmental challenges. The severity of issues like climate change and pollution demands immediate and widespread action. By requiring all companies to recycle, we can ensure a more significant and rapid impact on reducing waste and conserving resources. However, I also think that this mandate should be implemented gradually, with support and incentives provided to help businesses transition smoothly.

In conclusion, although there are valid arguments on both sides, the pressing need for environmental protection outweighs concerns about corporate autonomy in this matter. Governments should implement mandatory recycling programs for companies, but do so in a way that supports businesses through the transition.

(Word count: 309)

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The question of whether companies should be forced to recycle or do it voluntarily is a hot topic these days. There are good points on both sides of this argument, and I will discuss them before giving my own thoughts.

Some people think companies must be made to recycle by law. They say this is important because many businesses care more about making money than helping the environment. If recycling is not required, these companies might just throw away materials that could be reused, which is bad for our planet. Also, if all companies have to recycle, it’s fair for everyone and no one gets an unfair advantage by avoiding recycling costs.

However, others believe recycling should be a choice for companies. They worry that forcing businesses to recycle might make things more expensive, which could hurt smaller companies or make prices go up for customers. They also think that if customers want eco-friendly products, companies will start recycling on their own to make their customers happy.

In my opinion, I think it’s better if companies are required to recycle. While I understand the concerns about costs, I believe the environment is too important to leave it up to chance. Climate change and pollution are big problems that need big solutions, and making all companies recycle can help a lot. However, I think the government should help companies adjust to these new rules, maybe by giving them time to prepare or offering support to make the change easier.

To sum up, even though there are good arguments for both sides, I believe the need to protect our environment is more important than letting companies choose whether to recycle or not. Governments should make recycling a must for businesses, but they should also help companies do this without too much trouble.

(Word count: 300)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8 Essay:

This essay demonstrates the qualities of a high-scoring IELTS Writing Task 2 response:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a well-developed response with relevant, extended ideas.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Paragraphing is appropriate and effective.
  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used with flexibility and precision. Less common lexical items are used with accuracy.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A wide range of structures is used flexibly and accurately. Errors are rare and difficult to spot.

Band 6-7 Essay:

This essay shows characteristics of a mid-range IELTS Writing Task 2 response:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses all parts of the task, though some aspects are more fully developed than others.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a clear overall progression, but some ideas may not be fully extended. Paragraphing is evident but not always logical.
  3. Lexical Resource: An adequate range of vocabulary is used for the task. There may be some inaccuracy in word choice or collocation, but it does not impede communication.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used. There are some errors, but they do not impede communication.

IELTS Writing Task comparison of different band scoresIELTS Writing Task comparison of different band scores

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Corporate responsibility (noun): The idea that businesses should act in ways that benefit society.
    Pronunciation: /ˈkɔːrpərət rɪˌspɒnsəˈbɪləti/

  2. Mandatory (adjective): Required by law or rules; compulsory.
    Pronunciation: /ˈmændətɔːri/

  3. Voluntary (adjective): Done, given, or acting of one’s own free will.
    Pronunciation: /ˈvɒləntəri/

  4. Incentivize (verb): To encourage or motivate (someone) to do something.
    Pronunciation: /ɪnˈsentɪvaɪz/

  5. Sustainable (adjective): Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level.
    Pronunciation: /səˈsteɪnəbəl/

  6. Innovation (noun): The action or process of innovating; a new method, idea, product, etc.
    Pronunciation: /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃən/

  7. Autonomy (noun): The right or condition of self-government; freedom from external control.
    Pronunciation: /ɔːˈtɒnəmi/

  8. Eco-friendly (adjective): Not harmful to the environment.
    Pronunciation: /ˌiːkəʊ ˈfrendli/

These vocabulary items can significantly enhance your essay and demonstrate a strong command of English in your IELTS Writing Task 2 response.

Conclusion

The topic of corporate recycling mandates is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. As environmental concerns continue to grow globally, candidates may encounter similar questions about corporate environmental responsibility, should the government invest more in clean energy research?, or should governments ban single-use plastics. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on related topics such as:

  1. Should companies be held financially responsible for environmental damage?
  2. Is it the government’s responsibility to enforce corporate environmental standards?
  3. How can businesses balance profitability with environmental sustainability?

Remember, the key to success in IELTS Writing Task 2 is to practice regularly, focusing on developing clear arguments, using a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, and organizing your ideas coherently. Don’t forget to time yourself to ensure you can complete the task within the 40 minutes allotted in the actual exam.

We encourage you to practice writing an essay on this topic and share it in the comments section below. This active practice is an excellent way to improve your writing skills and prepare for the IELTS exam. Good luck with your IELTS preparation!

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.