Police misconduct is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2, appearing approximately once every 4-5 months in actual tests. Based on analysis of past exam questions from 2018-2023, this topic frequently emerges in various forms, particularly focusing on law enforcement accountability and reform measures. Here’s a recent example that has appeared in multiple test centers:
Some people believe that police officers who commit misconduct should face stricter punishments than ordinary citizens for similar offenses. Others think police officers should be treated the same as everyone else under the law. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Analysis of Question
This question requires:
- Discussion of both viewpoints regarding punishment severity for police misconduct
- Clear personal stance on the issue
- Well-structured arguments with relevant examples
- Balanced examination of pros and cons
Sample Essays
Band 8.5 Essay (290 words)
Police misconduct represents a serious breach of public trust, and there are divergent views regarding how such cases should be handled within the legal system. While both perspectives have merit, I firmly believe that law enforcement officers should face enhanced penalties for wrongdoing.
Those who advocate for equal treatment argue that democratic societies must maintain the fundamental principle of equality before the law. They contend that creating different standards of punishment based on profession could lead to an unfair two-tiered justice system. Moreover, they suggest that police officers already face significant professional consequences, including termination and loss of pension benefits, which serve as adequate deterrents.
However, I support the view that police officers should face stricter punishments for several compelling reasons. Firstly, law enforcement officials are entrusted with extraordinary powers and responsibilities, including the authority to use force and restrict citizens’ liberty. When they abuse these powers, they not only commit a crime but also violate their sworn duty to protect and serve. Furthermore, police misconduct has far-reaching implications for society, undermining public confidence in law enforcement and potentially destabilizing community relations.
Consider the case of evidence tampering – while this would be serious for any citizen, it becomes particularly egregious when committed by a police officer who is specifically tasked with preserving the integrity of investigations. Similar logic applies to crimes like assault or false testimony, where the officer’s position amplifies the severity of the offense.
In conclusion, while the principle of legal equality is important, the unique position and powers of police officers justify enhanced penalties for misconduct. This approach would help maintain high professional standards and reinforce public trust in law enforcement institutions.
Band 7.5 Essay (275 words)
The treatment of police officers who engage in misconduct has become a significant topic of debate in many societies. While some advocate for stricter punishments for law enforcement officials, others maintain that equal treatment under the law should prevail. I believe that police officers should indeed face more severe consequences for their misdeeds.
Proponents of equal treatment argue that the law should be applied uniformly to all citizens. They believe that creating separate standards of punishment could undermine the principle of equality before the law. Additionally, they point out that police officers already face internal disciplinary measures and potential job loss, which they consider sufficient punishment.
However, there are strong arguments for implementing harsher penalties for police misconduct. First, police officers hold positions of significant public trust and authority. When they abuse this trust, they not only break the law but also damage the reputation of law enforcement as a whole. Second, police officers are thoroughly trained in legal requirements and ethical conduct, making their violations more serious than those committed by ordinary citizens who may not have such training.
For example, if a police officer accepts bribes or falsifies evidence, they are not only committing a crime but also corrupting the very system they are meant to uphold. Their actions can lead to wrongful convictions, erosion of public confidence, and widespread distrust in law enforcement institutions.
In conclusion, while the principle of legal equality is important, the special status and responsibilities of police officers justify stricter punishments for misconduct. This approach would help maintain high standards within law enforcement and preserve public trust in the justice system.
Band 6.5 Essay (260 words)
Nowadays, there is a big debate about how to punish police officers who do wrong things. Some people think they should get bigger punishments than normal people, while others believe everyone should be treated the same. I think police should get stronger punishments.
Many people say that everyone should get the same punishment for the same crime. They think it’s not fair to have different rules for different people. Also, they say police officers already can lose their jobs if they do bad things, so that is enough punishment for them.
However, I think police officers should get bigger punishments because they have more responsibility than normal people. They are supposed to protect people and follow the law, so when they break it, it’s worse than when normal people do it. Also, police officers know the law very well, so they can’t say they didn’t understand what they were doing was wrong.
For example, if a normal person lies in court, it’s very bad. But if a police officer lies in court, it’s much worse because they are supposed to make sure justice happens. Their lies can make innocent people go to jail or let criminals go free.
In my opinion, giving police officers bigger punishments will make them think carefully before doing wrong things. It will also show people that no one is above the law, even police officers.
Key Vocabulary
- misconduct (n) /ˌmɪsˈkɒndʌkt/ – unacceptable or improper behavior
- deterrent (n) /dɪˈterənt/ – something that discourages certain behavior
- egregious (adj) /ɪˈɡriːdʒəs/ – outstandingly bad
- amplify (v) /ˈæmplɪfaɪ/ – to increase or magnify
- implications (n) /ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃnz/ – possible effects or consequences
- integrity (n) /ɪnˈteɡrəti/ – honesty and strong moral principles
- accountability (n) /əˌkaʊntəˈbɪləti/ – responsibility for one’s actions
- erosion (n) /ɪˈrəʊʒn/ – gradual destruction or diminution
For practice, try writing your own essay addressing how different countries handle police misconduct. Share your response in the comments section for feedback and discussion.