The topic of plastic packaging bans has become increasingly prevalent in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations, particularly in the last 5 years. Based on analysis of past exam questions, this environmental theme appears in approximately 15% of advantage/disadvantage or discussion essays, making it crucial for IELTS candidates to be well-prepared on this subject. Similar questions have asked about should plastic packaging be banned worldwide?, demonstrating its significance in the test.
Environmental impact of plastic packaging ban showing both positive and negative effects
Analysis of Task 2 Question
Some people think that governments should ban all forms of plastic packaging to reduce environmental damage. Others believe this would create more problems than it solves. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
This question requires candidates to:
- Discuss arguments for and against banning plastic packaging
- Present a balanced analysis of both perspectives
- Provide a clear personal opinion
- Support arguments with relevant examples
Band 8 Sample Essay
Similar to discussions about should single-use plastic be banned worldwide, this essay examines both perspectives carefully:
While many advocate for a complete ban on plastic packaging to protect our environment, others argue that such a drastic measure could have severe unintended consequences. In my opinion, while reducing plastic usage is crucial, an immediate complete ban would be counterproductive.
Proponents of plastic packaging bans highlight several compelling environmental benefits. Firstly, eliminating plastic packaging would significantly reduce marine pollution, as plastic waste constitutes approximately 80% of ocean debris. Additionally, banning plastic packaging would force industries to develop more sustainable alternatives, potentially accelerating innovations in biodegradable materials. For instance, some companies have already successfully developed packaging from seaweed and mushroom-based materials.
However, those opposing immediate bans present valid concerns about potential negative impacts. The most significant issue is that many current plastic alternatives have larger carbon footprints. Glass and metal packaging, while recyclable, require more energy to produce and transport, potentially increasing greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, sudden bans could disrupt essential sectors like healthcare, where sterile plastic packaging is crucial for medical supplies.
I believe the optimal approach lies in gradual reduction rather than immediate prohibition. Governments should implement phased restrictions while simultaneously investing in research for truly sustainable alternatives. This could include introducing higher taxes on plastic packaging, incentivizing eco-friendly alternatives, and supporting technological innovation in biodegradable materials.
(Word count: 273)
Comparison of different sustainable packaging alternatives showing environmental impact
Band 6.5 Sample Essay
For those interested in Should governments enforce a global plastic ban to protect marine life?, here’s a mid-band response:
Nowadays, many people think governments should stop all plastic packaging because it damages the environment. Other people think this will cause more problems. I will discuss both sides and give my opinion.
The main reason for banning plastic packaging is environmental protection. First, plastic waste is very bad for animals and sea life. Many animals die because they eat plastic or get trapped in it. Second, plastic takes hundreds of years to break down, so it stays in nature for a very long time. This means our planet is getting more and more polluted every year.
However, banning all plastic packaging can create different problems. Many important things need plastic packaging, like medicine and food. Without plastic packaging, these items might not stay fresh or clean. Also, other types of packaging like paper and glass are heavier and more expensive to transport. This means prices of many products will increase, which is bad for poor people.
In my opinion, we should not ban all plastic packaging immediately. Instead, governments should make rules to reduce plastic use slowly. They can also encourage companies to find better materials for packaging. This way, we can protect the environment without causing too many problems for people and businesses.
(Word count: 262)
Scoring Analysis
Band 8 Essay Features:
- Sophisticated vocabulary and complex structures
- Clear organization and cohesion
- Well-developed arguments with specific examples
- Balanced discussion with clear personal stance
- Academic tone throughout
Band 6.5 Essay Features:
- Simple but clear vocabulary
- Basic organization present
- Some development of ideas
- Less sophisticated examples
- More informal tone in places
Key Vocabulary
- counterproductive (adj) /ˌkaʊntərprəˈdʌktɪv/ – having the opposite effect to what is intended
- biodegradable (adj) /ˌbaɪəʊdɪˈɡreɪdəbl/ – capable of being decomposed by bacteria or other living organisms
- paramount (adj) /ˈpærəmaʊnt/ – more important than anything else
- sustainable (adj) /səˈsteɪnəbl/ – able to be maintained at a certain rate or level
- incentivize (v) /ɪnˈsentɪvaɪz/ – motivate or encourage someone to do something
Similar discussions about Should governments ban the use of single-use plastics? show these vocabulary items are particularly useful for environmental topics.
To practice your writing skills, try composing your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments section below. Focus on maintaining a clear structure and incorporating the vocabulary provided above.
