Site icon IETLS.NET

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Essays: Charging Higher Fees for Foreign Tourists at Cultural Sites (Band 6.5-8.5)

Foreign tourists and local visitors at historical attraction entrance

Foreign tourists and local visitors at historical attraction entrance

The topic of differential pricing for foreign visitors at cultural and historical attractions has appeared several times in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams, particularly in countries with rich cultural heritage like India, China, and Thailand. Based on recent test reports, this theme typically appears 2-3 times annually, making it a significant topic for IELTS candidates.

Foreign tourists and local visitors at historical attraction entranceForeign tourists and local visitors at historical attraction entrance

Analysis of Recent Exam Question

Some people think that foreign visitors should pay more than local people for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

This question requires candidates to express their stance on differential pricing policies and support their position with relevant arguments and examples.

Band 8.5 Sample Essay

Over the past decade, many countries have implemented dual pricing systems at their cultural sites, charging international tourists higher entrance fees than locals. While this practice has sparked debate, I firmly disagree with this discriminatory approach for several reasons.

Firstly, differential pricing based on nationality contradicts the fundamental principle of cultural exchange and global understanding. Historical and cultural sites are universal heritage that should be equally accessible to all visitors, regardless of their country of origin. Creating financial barriers for foreign tourists may foster resentment and undermine the spirit of international tourism, which aims to promote cross-cultural appreciation and learning.

Moreover, this pricing strategy could have adverse economic implications. Higher entrance fees might discourage international visitors, potentially reducing overall tourism revenue and affecting local businesses that depend on foreign tourists. For instance, countries like Thailand, which experimented with substantial price differences at major attractions, noticed that some budget-conscious travelers opted to visit alternative destinations where they felt more fairly treated.

Furthermore, many foreign visitors already contribute significantly to local economies through various other channels. They typically spend more on accommodation, transportation, and other services compared to local residents. Adding premium charges for cultural attractions essentially amounts to double taxation on international tourists, who are already investing considerably in their visit.

Instead of discriminatory pricing, authorities should consider alternative funding models to maintain cultural sites. This could include implementing a universal conservation fee or developing sustainable tourism programs that benefit both local communities and international visitors equally.

Band 6.5 Sample Essay

Nowadays, many tourist places make foreign visitors pay more money than local people. I disagree with this idea because it is not fair and can cause problems.

First, it is not right to charge different prices just because someone comes from another country. All people should pay the same amount to see historical places because culture belongs to everyone. When tourists pay more, they feel bad and might think the country is not friendly to visitors.

Second, high prices can make fewer tourists want to visit. If foreign people think the tickets are too expensive, they will go to other countries instead. This is bad for the local economy because tourists bring lots of money for hotels, restaurants, and shops.

Also, foreign visitors already spend more money than local people on many things. They pay for hotels, food, and travel. Making them pay extra for tourist places is like asking them to pay twice.

I think it would be better if everyone paid the same price. The government can find other ways to get money for taking care of historical places, like asking all visitors to give a small donation.

Analysis of Band Scores

Band 8.5 Essay Features:

  • Sophisticated vocabulary and complex structures
  • Clear, coherent arguments with excellent examples
  • Smooth paragraph transitions
  • Advanced cohesive devices
  • Precise word choice and academic tone

Band 6.5 Essay Features:

  • Basic but clear arguments
  • Simple but accurate grammar
  • Limited range of vocabulary
  • Basic cohesive devices
  • Some repetition in expression

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. differential pricing (n) /ˌdɪfəˈrenʃəl ˈpraɪsɪŋ/ – system of charging different prices to different customers
  2. discriminatory (adj) /dɪˈskrɪmɪnətəri/ – treating one group of people less fairly than others
  3. cross-cultural appreciation (n) /krɒs ˈkʌltʃərəl əˌpriːʃiˈeɪʃən/ – understanding and respect between different cultures
  4. universal heritage (n) /ˌjuːnɪˈvɜːsəl ˈherɪtɪdʒ/ – cultural assets belonging to all humanity
  5. adverse implications (n) /ˈædvɜːs ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃənz/ – negative consequences or effects

For practice, try writing your own essay addressing how cultural sites can maintain sustainability without implementing differential pricing. Share your essay in the comments for feedback and discussion.

Exit mobile version