Writing Task 1 của kỳ thi IELTS thường yêu cầu phân tích các biểu đồ, bảng số liệu hoặc đồ thị. Một trong những chủ đề phổ biến là so sánh mức độ tiếp cận chăm sóc y tế giữa các quốc gia qua các năm. Bài viết này sẽ hướng dẫn bạn cách xử lý đề thi liên quan đến chủ đề này, cung cấp các ví dụ về cách làm và lưu ý về từ vựng, ngữ pháp để đạt điểm cao.
Sample Task Statement
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The bar chart below shows the levels of access to healthcare in five different countries between the years 2000 and 2023. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Data Representation
Dataset: Below is the bar chart showing the levels of access to healthcare in Country A, Country B, Country C, Country D, and Country E from 2000 to 2023.
Healthcare Access by Country
Analyzing the Task
When analyzing such a task, it’s important to note:
- Key trends and significant changes over the period.
- Comparisons between countries.
- Identifying the highest and lowest points.
For the provided dataset, observe:
- Which country has the highest and lowest levels of access to healthcare?
- Any noticeable upward or downward trends over the years?
Sample Writing
The bar chart illustrates the levels of access to healthcare in five countries (Country A, Country B, Country C, Country D, and Country E) over a span of 23 years, from 2000 to 2023.
Overall, it is evident that healthcare access has generally improved in most countries, with notable fluctuations in a few. Country A consistently shows the highest level of access to healthcare throughout the entire period. In contrast, Country E demonstrates the lowest access levels among the five countries surveyed.
From 2000 to 2013, Country A and Country B both saw significant improvements, with the healthcare access level increasing from approximately 70% to 90% for Country A, and from 60% to 85% for Country B. Meanwhile, Country C had a moderate increase from 50% to 75%, while Country D showed minimal advancement, ranging between 40% and 60%.
However, post-2013, Country A’s healthcare access plateaued around 90%, whereas Country B and Country C continued to experience steady increases, reaching around 95% by 2023. Surprisingly, Country D saw a relatively sharp rise in healthcare access from 2013 onwards, reaching 80% by 2023. Conversely, Country E’s access level increased marginally from 30% to 50% over the entire period, making it the least improved among the five countries.
In conclusion, while all countries have made progress in enhancing healthcare access, the rates of improvement vary considerably, with Country A leading and Country E lagging significantly behind.
Word count: 228 words
Important Vocabulary and Grammar Tips
Vocabulary
- Consistently (adv.): /kənˈsɪstəntli/ – In every case or on every occasion; invariably.
- Notable (adj.): /ˈnoʊtəbəl/ – Worthy of attention or notice; remarkable.
- Fluctuations (n.): /ˌflʌktʃuˈeɪʃənz/ – Irregular rising and falling in number or amount; variations.
- Plateaued (v.): /plæˈtoʊd/ – Reach a state of little or no change following a period of activity or progress.
- Marginally (adv.): /ˈmɑːrdʒɪnəli/ – To a limited extent; slightly.
Tips for Writing
- Use comparative and superlative forms: E.g., “higher access than”, “the lowest access”.
- Compound sentences: To add depth to your analysis, use conjunctions like “while”, “whereas” to link related ideas.
- Passive voice: For describing trends or reports (e.g., “it is reported that…”).
- Quantitative expressions: Clearly describe changes using percentages, figures like “increased by 20%”, “rose from 30% to 50%”.
Conclusion
In summary, through careful analysis and structured writing, it is possible to effectively tackle IELTS Writing Task 1 questions related to comparing levels of access to healthcare in different countries. Understanding the significance of data and presenting it clearly with appropriate vocabulary and grammar ensures you meet the criteria for a high band score. Always aim to present your key findings logically and cohesively.
