Smoking bans in public places have been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2, appearing regularly over the past decade. Based on analysis from major IELTS preparation websites and past exam records, this topic has appeared in various forms, particularly focusing on government regulation and public health impacts. Let’s examine a recent high-frequency question type on this subject.
Should smoking be banned in public places remains one of the most debated topics in IELTS Writing Task 2, with similar questions appearing approximately every 3-4 months in actual tests.
Question Analysis
Some people believe that there should be a complete ban on smoking in all public places globally. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
This question requires candidates to:
- Express their position on a global smoking ban
- Support their argument with relevant examples
- Consider potential counterarguments
- Provide a balanced discussion
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8.0)
In recent years, there has been growing support for implementing a worldwide ban on smoking in public spaces. I strongly agree with this proposition as it would significantly benefit public health and create a more pleasant environment for everyone.
The primary argument in favor of a global smoking ban is the protection of public health. Secondhand smoke contains numerous carcinogenic compounds that pose serious health risks to non-smokers, particularly children and elderly individuals. For instance, research has shown that exposure to secondhand smoke in public spaces increases the risk of respiratory diseases by up to 30%. Moreover, implementing smoking bans in countries like Ireland and New Zealand has led to a measurable decrease in hospital admissions for smoking-related illnesses.
Furthermore, a universal smoking ban would create more enjoyable public spaces. Currently, non-smokers often have to endure unpleasant smoke while dining outdoors or walking through crowded areas. A comprehensive ban would ensure that everyone can enjoy public spaces without this involuntary exposure to tobacco smoke. This has been demonstrated in cities like Singapore, where strict smoking regulations have significantly improved the quality of public spaces.
While some argue that such bans infringe upon personal freedoms, the right to clean air and a healthy environment should take precedence. Smokers would still maintain the freedom to smoke in private spaces, where their actions do not directly affect others. Additionally, global implementation would ensure consistency across borders and prevent confusion for international travelers.
In conclusion, I firmly support a worldwide ban on smoking in public places due to its clear benefits for public health and environmental quality. Such a measure would represent a significant step forward in promoting global public health and creating more pleasant shared spaces for all.
Benefits of smoke-free public environments worldwide
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6.5)
Nowadays, many people think smoking should be banned in all public places around the world. I agree with this idea because it is good for people’s health and makes public places better.
First, smoking in public places is bad for health. When people smoke, other people have to breathe the smoke too. This is called passive smoking and it can cause many health problems like cancer and breathing problems. For example, many children get sick because their parents smoke near them in parks and restaurants.
Also, smoking makes public places dirty and uncomfortable. Cigarette smoke has a bad smell that stays on clothes and hair. Many people don’t like this smell when they go to restaurants or shopping malls. Also, smokers often throw cigarette butts on the ground, which makes places look dirty.
Some people say that smokers should have the right to smoke where they want. However, I think non-smokers’ rights are more important because they want to stay healthy. Smokers can still smoke at home or in special smoking areas.
In conclusion, I support banning smoking in public places because it protects people’s health and makes public places nicer for everyone.
Essay Analysis
Band 8.0 Essay Features:
- Sophisticated vocabulary and complex structures
- Clear organization and cohesive devices
- Well-developed arguments with specific examples
- Balanced discussion considering counterarguments
- Appropriate academic tone
Band 6.5 Essay Features:
- Basic but clear vocabulary
- Simple sentence structures
- Limited use of examples
- Basic organization
- Some repetition of ideas
Key Vocabulary
- carcinogenic (adj) /ˌkɑːsɪnəˈdʒenɪk/ – causing cancer
- involuntary exposure (n) /ɪnˈvɒləntri ɪkˈspəʊʒə/ – unintentional contact
- precedence (n) /ˈpresɪdəns/ – priority in importance
- comprehensive (adj) /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/ – complete; including all aspects
- implementation (n) /ˌɪmplɪmenˈteɪʃən/ – the process of putting a plan into action
Consider practicing with these similar topics:
- Should smoking be completely banned in all forms?
- Should governments increase taxes on tobacco products?
- Should smoking be banned in private vehicles?
Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion.
