As an IELTS Writing Task 2 expert, I’ve noticed that topics related to environmental issues, particularly plastic pollution and initiatives to combat it, have become increasingly prevalent in recent exams. The subject of “global initiatives to ban single-use plastics” is not only a hot topic in real-world discussions but also a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions. Based on my analysis of past exam trends and current environmental concerns, I predict that this topic will continue to appear frequently in future IELTS tests.
Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:
Some people believe that there should be a global ban on single-use plastics to address environmental concerns. Others argue that such a ban would be impractical and economically damaging. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analyzing the Question
This question requires candidates to:
- Discuss arguments in favor of a global ban on single-use plastics
- Explore reasons why some people oppose such a ban
- Provide a personal opinion on the issue
The topic combines environmental concerns with economic considerations, making it a complex issue that allows for a nuanced discussion.
Sample Essays for Different Band Scores
Band 8-9 Essay Sample
The proliferation of single-use plastics has become a global environmental crisis, prompting calls for a worldwide ban. While some argue that such a measure is essential for environmental protection, others contend that it would be impractical and economically detrimental. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.
Proponents of a global ban on single-use plastics argue that it is a necessary step to mitigate the devastating impact of plastic pollution on our ecosystems. The accumulation of plastic waste in our oceans, for instance, has led to the formation of massive garbage patches, endangering marine life and disrupting entire food chains. Moreover, the production and disposal of single-use plastics contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, exacerbating climate change. A comprehensive ban would force industries and consumers to adopt more sustainable alternatives, potentially catalyzing innovation in eco-friendly materials and practices.
On the other hand, opponents of such a ban contend that it would be impractical to implement on a global scale and could have severe economic repercussions. Many industries rely heavily on single-use plastics for packaging, transportation, and various applications, and an abrupt ban could lead to substantial job losses and economic instability. Furthermore, in developing countries where waste management infrastructure is lacking, single-use plastics often serve essential purposes in food safety and medical applications. Critics argue that a more gradual approach, focusing on improving recycling technologies and waste management systems, would be more feasible and less disruptive.
In my opinion, while the concerns about economic impact are valid, the urgent need to address plastic pollution necessitates bold action. I believe that a phased approach to banning single-use plastics globally could strike a balance between environmental protection and economic considerations. This could involve setting progressive targets for reduction, coupled with investments in alternative materials and recycling infrastructure. Such an approach would allow industries time to adapt while still sending a clear message about the need for change.
In conclusion, the debate over banning single-use plastics globally highlights the complex interplay between environmental and economic concerns. While there are challenges to implementing such a ban, the long-term benefits to our planet’s health outweigh the short-term economic disruptions. A carefully planned, phased approach could pave the way for a more sustainable future without causing undue economic hardship.
(Word count: 379)
Band 6-7 Essay Sample
The issue of banning single-use plastics globally is a topic of much debate. Some people think it is necessary for protecting the environment, while others believe it would cause economic problems. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Those who support a global ban on single-use plastics have strong reasons. Plastic pollution is a big problem for the environment, especially for oceans and marine life. Many animals die because they eat plastic or get trapped in it. Also, making and throwing away plastics creates a lot of pollution and contributes to climate change. If we ban single-use plastics, people and companies will have to find better alternatives that are less harmful to the environment.
However, there are also arguments against a complete ban. Many businesses depend on single-use plastics for packaging and other uses. If these plastics are banned suddenly, it could lead to job losses and economic problems. In poorer countries, single-use plastics are sometimes important for keeping food safe and for medical purposes. Some people think it’s better to focus on recycling and better waste management instead of a total ban.
In my opinion, we need to do something about plastic pollution, but we should be careful about how we do it. I think a gradual ban on single-use plastics could work well. This would give companies time to find new materials and ways of doing things. At the same time, governments should invest in recycling and encourage people to use less plastic.
To conclude, while banning single-use plastics globally is a complicated issue with both environmental and economic impacts, I believe a step-by-step approach to reducing plastic use is the best way forward. This can help protect the environment without causing too much economic difficulty.
(Word count: 298)
Band 5-6 Essay Sample
Nowadays, many people talk about banning single-use plastics in the world. Some think it’s a good idea, but others say it will cause problems. I will write about both sides and give my opinion.
People who want to ban single-use plastics say it’s good for the environment. Plastic is bad for animals and the ocean. Many fish and birds die because of plastic. Also, making plastic causes pollution. If we stop using single-use plastics, we can help save the planet.
But some people don’t agree with banning plastics. They say it will be bad for business. Many jobs depend on making and selling plastic things. In poor countries, people need plastic for food and medicine. These people think we should recycle more instead of banning plastic.
I think both sides have good points. Plastic is bad for the environment, but many people need it. Maybe we can slowly stop using single-use plastics. This way, companies can find new ways to make things without plastic. Also, we should teach people to use less plastic and recycle more.
In conclusion, banning single-use plastics is not easy. It has good and bad points. I think we should try to use less plastic but do it slowly so it doesn’t cause too many problems.
(Word count: 214)
Explanation of Band Scores
Band 8-9 Essay:
- Task Response: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a well-developed response. Presents a clear position throughout.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organized with clear progression. Uses a range of cohesive devices effectively.
- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy.
Band 6-7 Essay:
- Task Response: Addresses all parts of the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information coherently and there is clear overall progression.
- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There may be some inaccuracies in word choice.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. There are some errors, but they do not impede communication.
Band 5-6 Essay:
- Task Response: Addresses the task only partially. The format may be inappropriate in places.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Presents information with some organization but there may be a lack of overall progression.
- Lexical Resource: Uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses only a limited range of structures. Errors may cause some difficulty for the reader.
Key Vocabulary to Remember
- Proliferation (noun) /prəˌlɪf.əˈreɪ.ʃən/ – rapid increase in the number or amount of something
- Mitigate (verb) /ˈmɪt.ɪ.ɡeɪt/ – to make something less harmful, serious, or painful
- Exacerbate (verb) /ɪɡˈzæs.ər.beɪt/ – to make something worse
- Repercussion (noun) /ˌriː.pərˈkʌʃ.ən/ – an unintended consequence of an event or action
- Catalyze (verb) /ˈkæt.əl.aɪz/ – to cause or accelerate a reaction
- Feasible (adjective) /ˈfiː.zə.bəl/ – possible and practical to do easily or conveniently
- Phased (adjective) /feɪzd/ – done or introduced gradually or in stages
- Interplay (noun) /ˈɪn.tə.pleɪ/ – the way in which two or more things have an effect on each other
In conclusion, mastering essays on global initiatives to ban single-use plastics requires a deep understanding of both environmental and economic perspectives. By studying these sample essays and analyzing their structure, vocabulary, and argumentation, you can improve your own writing skills for IELTS Task 2. Remember to practice writing your own essays on this topic and related environmental issues, as they are likely to appear in future IELTS exams. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section below for feedback and further discussion.