Mastering IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Government Policies to Reduce Economic Inequality

Economic inequality is a pressing global issue that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions. This topic has been a recurring theme in recent years, and its relevance is likely to continue in future …

Government policies to reduce economic inequality

Economic inequality is a pressing global issue that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions. This topic has been a recurring theme in recent years, and its relevance is likely to continue in future exams. Understanding how to approach this subject can significantly boost your performance in the IELTS Writing test. Let’s explore a sample question and analyze high-scoring responses to help you prepare effectively.

Analyzing the Question

Some people believe that governments should focus on reducing economic inequality. Others think that this is not achievable and governments should focus on other priorities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This question presents a classic IELTS Writing Task 2 format: discussing two contrasting views and providing your own perspective. Let’s break down the key elements:

  1. View 1: Governments should prioritize reducing economic inequality
  2. View 2: Reducing economic inequality is not achievable, and governments should focus elsewhere
  3. Your task: Discuss both viewpoints and express your own opinion

Remember to address all parts of the question in your response to achieve a high band score.

Sample Essay 1: Band 8-9 Response

In recent years, the widening gap between the rich and poor has become a subject of intense debate. While some argue that governments should prioritize reducing economic inequality, others contend that this goal is unattainable and that governments should focus on other pressing issues. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own view.

Proponents of government intervention in reducing economic inequality argue that it is essential for social stability and economic growth. They contend that excessive wealth concentration at the top hampers economic mobility and creates social unrest. Policies such as progressive taxation, wealth redistribution, and investment in public services can help level the playing field and create more opportunities for disadvantaged groups. For instance, countries like Sweden and Denmark have successfully implemented such policies, resulting in lower income disparities and higher overall quality of life.

On the other hand, skeptics argue that attempts to reduce economic inequality are futile and potentially counterproductive. They believe that income differences are a natural outcome of varying individual abilities and efforts, and that government intervention may stifle innovation and economic growth. These critics suggest that governments should instead focus on creating a business-friendly environment, improving education, and fostering entrepreneurship to promote overall prosperity. They point to examples like Singapore, where a focus on economic growth has lifted living standards across the board, despite relatively high income inequality.

In my opinion, while completely eradicating economic inequality may be unrealistic, governments have a responsibility to mitigate its worst effects. A balanced approach that combines pro-growth policies with targeted interventions to support the most vulnerable members of society is likely to yield the best results. This could include initiatives such as progressive taxation, investments in education and healthcare, and programs to promote social mobility. By doing so, governments can foster a more equitable society without sacrificing economic dynamism.

In conclusion, while the debate on government’s role in addressing economic inequality continues, it is clear that a nuanced approach is necessary. By carefully balancing growth-oriented policies with measures to promote social equity, governments can work towards creating societies that are both prosperous and fair.

(Word count: 329)

Government policies to reduce economic inequalityGovernment policies to reduce economic inequality

Analysis of Band 8-9 Essay

This essay demonstrates several key features that contribute to its high band score:

  1. Clear structure: The essay follows a logical structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both views, and a conclusion that summarizes the main points and offers a balanced opinion.

  2. Coherence and cohesion: The essay uses a range of linking words and phrases to connect ideas smoothly, such as “On the other hand,” “For instance,” and “In conclusion.”

  3. Lexical resource: The writer employs a wide range of vocabulary accurately and appropriately, including topic-specific terms like “progressive taxation,” “wealth redistribution,” and “economic mobility.”

  4. Grammatical range and accuracy: The essay showcases a variety of complex sentence structures with minimal errors, demonstrating a high level of grammatical control.

  5. Task response: All parts of the question are fully addressed, with a clear discussion of both viewpoints and a well-developed personal opinion.

  6. Examples and elaboration: The writer provides specific examples (Sweden, Denmark, Singapore) to support the arguments, adding depth to the discussion.

Sample Essay 2: Band 6-7 Response

Economic inequality is a big problem in many countries today. Some people think governments should try to reduce it, while others believe this is not possible and governments should focus on other things. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument.

Those who support government action to reduce economic inequality say it is important for a fair society. They believe that when the gap between rich and poor is too big, it can cause social problems. Governments can use policies like higher taxes on rich people and more spending on education and healthcare to help poorer people. For example, some European countries have lower inequality because of these kinds of policies.

On the other hand, some people think governments cannot really fix economic inequality. They say that differences in income are natural because people have different skills and work harder than others. They argue that if governments try to make everyone equal, it might hurt the economy and discourage people from working hard. These people think governments should focus on making the economy grow, which will help everyone in the long run.

In my opinion, I think governments should try to reduce economic inequality, but they should be careful not to harm economic growth. It’s important to find a balance between helping poor people and encouraging people to work hard and be successful. Governments could focus on giving everyone a good education and healthcare, which can help poor people have more opportunities to improve their lives.

To conclude, while reducing economic inequality is challenging, I believe governments should try to address this issue. By using sensible policies, they can work towards creating a fairer society without damaging the economy.

(Word count: 278)

Analysis of Band 6-7 Essay

This essay demonstrates several characteristics that place it in the Band 6-7 range:

  1. Task response: The essay addresses all parts of the question, discussing both viewpoints and offering a personal opinion. However, the ideas could be developed more fully.

  2. Coherence and cohesion: The essay has a clear structure with separate paragraphs for each viewpoint and a conclusion. Basic linking words are used, but more sophisticated cohesive devices could improve the flow.

  3. Lexical resource: The vocabulary is generally appropriate, but lacks the sophistication and range seen in higher band scores. There is some attempt to use topic-specific vocabulary (e.g., “economic inequality,” “social problems”).

  4. Grammatical range and accuracy: The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences with generally good control. However, there is less variety in sentence structures compared to higher band essays.

  5. Examples: The essay includes some examples, but they are less specific and detailed than those in the Band 8-9 essay.

  6. Depth of analysis: While the main ideas are present, the analysis lacks the depth and nuance of higher band essays.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Economic inequality (noun) – /ˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk ɪnɪˈkwɒlɪti/ – Disparity in economic well-being between individuals or groups
  2. Progressive taxation (noun) – /prəˈɡresɪv tækˈseɪʃən/ – A tax system where higher earners pay a higher rate of tax
  3. Wealth redistribution (noun) – /welθ ˌriːdɪstrɪˈbjuːʃən/ – The transfer of income or assets from wealthier individuals to poorer ones
  4. Social mobility (noun) – /ˈsəʊʃəl məʊˈbɪləti/ – The ability to move between different social classes or economic levels
  5. Entrepreneurship (noun) – /ˌɒntrəprəˈnɜːʃɪp/ – The activity of setting up and running businesses
  6. Income disparity (noun) – /ˈɪnkʌm dɪˈspærəti/ – The gap between the incomes of different groups in society
  7. Socioeconomic (adjective) – /ˌsəʊsɪəʊˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk/ – Relating to or concerned with the interaction of social and economic factors
  8. Fiscal policy (noun) – /ˈfɪskəl ˈpɒləsi/ – Government policy on taxation, public spending, and borrowing
  9. Welfare state (noun) – /ˈwelfeə steɪt/ – A system where the government provides a range of social services to protect its citizens
  10. Gini coefficient (noun) – /ˈdʒiːni ˌkəʊɪˈfɪʃənt/ – A measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent income or wealth inequality

Conclusion

Understanding how to approach questions about Government Policies To Reduce Economic Inequality is crucial for success in IELTS Writing Task 2. By analyzing the sample essays and vocabulary provided, you can develop the skills needed to craft a well-structured, coherent response that addresses all aspects of the question.

As you prepare for your IELTS exam, consider practicing with similar topics. For instance, you might encounter questions about:

  1. The role of education in reducing economic inequality
  2. The impact of globalization on income disparities
  3. The effectiveness of minimum wage policies in addressing poverty
  4. The balance between economic growth and income equality

Remember, the key to improving your IELTS Writing score is consistent practice. Try writing your own essay on the topic discussed in this article and share it in the comments section below. This active practice will help you refine your skills and gain valuable feedback from others preparing for the IELTS exam.

For more insights on related topics, you might find these articles helpful:

Good luck with your IELTS preparation!

New Topics

Mastering IELTS Speaking: How to Expertly Describe a Nature Park You’d Like to Explore

The topic of describing a nature park you’d like to explore is a common theme in IELTS Speaking tests. It has appeared frequently in past exams and is likely to ...

Unveiling the Perfect Oasis: How to Eloquently Describe Your Favorite Relaxation Spot in IELTS Speaking

The IELTS Speaking test often includes questions about personal preferences and experiences, making “Describe A Favorite Place In Your Country To Relax” a commonly encountered topic. This theme has appeared ...

Mastering the Art of Describing an Old Friend: IELTS Speaking Success Guide

Describing an old friend you still keep in touch with is a popular topic in IELTS Speaking tests. This theme often appears in Part 2 of the speaking exam, where ...

Unlocking the Explorer’s Tale: Mastering IELTS Speaking About a Person Who Loves Discovering New Places

The IELTS Speaking test often includes questions about people who enjoy exploring new places. This topic allows candidates to showcase their vocabulary, fluency, and ability to describe personal experiences. Let’s ...

Mastering IELTS Speaking: Expert Advice on Describing Guidance for a Friend

The IELTS Speaking test often includes questions about giving advice, making it a crucial topic for candidates to prepare. One common question that frequently appears is “Describe A Piece Of ...