Quantitative easing and its effects on the stock market is a complex topic that has gained prominence in recent years. While it may not be a frequent subject in IELTS Writing Task 2, understanding its economic implications can be valuable for test-takers. Based on trends in past exams and the growing importance of economic policies, we can expect to see related questions appearing more often in future tests.
Let’s examine a relevant IELTS Writing Task 2 question that touches on this subject:
Some people believe that governments should focus on economic growth through policies like quantitative easing, while others argue that such measures can lead to long-term economic problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Analysis of the Question
This question requires candidates to:
- Understand the concept of quantitative easing as an economic policy
- Discuss arguments for and against such policies
- Provide a balanced view of both perspectives
- Express a personal opinion with supporting reasons
Impact of economic policies on stock prices is a crucial aspect to consider when addressing this topic. Let’s look at sample essays for different band scores to illustrate how to approach this question effectively.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
Governments worldwide grapple with the challenge of stimulating economic growth, and quantitative easing has emerged as a controversial tool in their arsenal. While proponents argue that such measures can provide much-needed stimulus during economic downturns, critics contend that they may lead to long-term instability. This essay will examine both perspectives before offering a nuanced opinion on the matter.
Those in favor of quantitative easing policies argue that they can effectively jumpstart a stagnant economy. By injecting liquidity into the financial system, central banks can lower interest rates, encouraging borrowing and investment. This, in turn, can stimulate consumer spending and business expansion, ultimately leading to job creation and economic growth. Moreover, advocates point out that during severe recessions or crises, conventional monetary policy tools may be insufficient, necessitating more aggressive measures like quantitative easing.
On the other hand, critics raise valid concerns about the potential long-term consequences of such policies. One primary argument is that quantitative easing can lead to asset bubbles, particularly in the stock market and real estate sectors. As cheap money flows into the economy, it may artificially inflate asset prices, creating instability that could result in a painful correction. Additionally, there are worries about the inflationary pressures that may build up over time, potentially eroding the purchasing power of currency and creating economic imbalances.
In my view, while quantitative easing can be a powerful tool in addressing acute economic crises, it should be employed judiciously and with careful consideration of its long-term implications. Governments and central banks must strike a delicate balance between providing necessary stimulus and avoiding the creation of unsustainable economic conditions. It is crucial to complement quantitative easing with structural reforms and prudent fiscal policies to ensure sustainable, long-term economic growth.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding quantitative easing reflects the complex nature of economic policymaking. While it can offer short-term benefits, the potential risks cannot be ignored. A measured approach that considers both immediate needs and long-term stability is essential for effective economic governance.
(Word count: 352)
Explanation of Band Score 8-9
This essay demonstrates the qualities of a high band score (8-9) for several reasons:
- Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion.
- Coherence and Cohesion: The ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively.
- Lexical Resource: The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features. Key terms related to the topic are used accurately.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: It displays a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy. There are no noticeable errors, and the writing demonstrates a high level of grammatical control.
- Critical Thinking: The essay shows depth of analysis and presents a nuanced view of the topic, acknowledging the complexity of the issue.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
In recent years, governments have been using different methods to improve their economies. One of these methods is quantitative easing, which some people think is good for economic growth. However, others believe it can cause problems in the long run. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument and give my opinion.
Those who support quantitative easing say it can help boost the economy when it’s not doing well. When central banks put more money into the financial system, it can make it easier for people and businesses to borrow money. This can lead to more spending and investment, which can create jobs and help the economy grow. Also, during big economic problems like the 2008 financial crisis, normal ways of managing the economy might not be enough, so quantitative easing can be a useful tool.
On the other hand, there are people who worry about the long-term effects of quantitative easing. One big concern is that it might create bubbles in things like the stock market or housing prices. When there’s too much cheap money available, prices for these assets might go up too much and then crash later. Another worry is that it could lead to inflation, which means prices for everyday things could go up a lot over time.
In my opinion, I think quantitative easing can be helpful in some situations, but governments need to be careful when using it. It’s important to think about both the short-term benefits and the possible long-term problems. Governments should also try to use other ways to improve the economy, like changing laws or managing their budgets carefully, instead of relying too much on quantitative easing.
To conclude, quantitative easing is a complicated topic with both good and bad points. While it can help during economic difficulties, it’s crucial to use it wisely to avoid creating bigger problems in the future.
(Word count: 313)
Explanation of Band Score 6-7
This essay demonstrates the characteristics of a Band 6-7 for the following reasons:
- Task Achievement: The essay addresses all parts of the task, presenting both views and offering a personal opinion. However, the development of ideas is less thorough compared to the Band 8-9 essay.
- Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is generally well-organized with clear overall progression. Paragraphing is logical, but the use of cohesive devices is less sophisticated than in higher band scores.
- Lexical Resource: There is a sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, with some attempts at using less common lexical items. However, the language use is less precise and varied compared to the Band 8-9 essay.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. There are some errors, but they do not impede communication.
- Critical Thinking: While the essay presents arguments for both sides, the analysis is less deep and nuanced compared to higher band scores.
Key Vocabulary
- Quantitative easing (noun) – /ˈkwɒntɪtətɪv ˈiːzɪŋ/ – A monetary policy in which a central bank purchases government securities or other securities from the market to lower interest rates and increase the money supply.
- Economic growth (noun phrase) – /ˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk ˈɡrəʊθ/ – An increase in the amount of goods and services produced per head of the population over a period of time.
- Monetary policy (noun phrase) – /ˈmʌnɪt(ə)ri ˈpɒləsi/ – The actions of a central bank, currency board or other regulatory committee that determine the size and rate of growth of the money supply.
- Liquidity (noun) – /lɪˈkwɪdəti/ – The availability of liquid assets to a market or company.
- Asset bubble (noun phrase) – /ˈæset ˈbʌbl/ – A situation in which the price of an asset, such as stocks or real estate, becomes overvalued and unsustainable.
- Inflation (noun) – /ɪnˈfleɪʃn/ – A general increase in prices and fall in the purchasing value of money.
- Fiscal policy (noun phrase) – /ˈfɪskl ˈpɒləsi/ – The use of government spending and tax policies to influence economic conditions.
- Stimulus (noun) – /ˈstɪmjʊləs/ – Something that encourages activity or development, especially in the economy.
These vocabulary items are crucial for discussing economic policies and their impacts on financial markets. Understanding and using them correctly can significantly enhance the quality of your IELTS Writing Task 2 essay on this topic.
Conclusion
Understanding the complexities of economic policies like quantitative easing and their effects on stock markets is valuable for IELTS candidates. While this specific topic may not appear frequently, the skills developed in analyzing and discussing such complex issues are transferable to many other IELTS Writing Task 2 questions.
For practice, consider writing essays on related topics such as:
- The role of government intervention in free markets
- The impact of globalization on national economies
- The balance between economic growth and environmental protection
Remember to focus on clear structure, balanced arguments, and appropriate use of economic terminology. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and further discussion. This active engagement will help you refine your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS exam.