The topic of protecting jobs in the manufacturing sector has been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Given the ongoing global economic changes and technological advancements, it’s likely to remain a relevant issue in future tests. This article will provide you with sample essays and a comprehensive analysis to help you excel in your IELTS Writing Task 2 preparation.
Analyzing the Topic
Before we dive into the sample essays, let’s examine a typical question you might encounter:
Some people think that governments should protect jobs in the manufacturing sector from automation and globalization. Others believe that change is inevitable. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
This question asks you to consider two contrasting viewpoints:
- Governments should protect manufacturing jobs from automation and globalization.
- Change in the job market is inevitable.
You’re expected to discuss both perspectives and provide your own opinion. This type of question falls under the “discuss both views and give your opinion” category, which is common in IELTS Writing Task 2.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
In today’s rapidly evolving global economy, the fate of jobs in the manufacturing sector has become a topic of heated debate. While some argue that governments should intervene to protect these jobs from the threats of automation and globalization, others contend that change is an unavoidable aspect of economic progress. This essay will examine both viewpoints before presenting my own perspective on the matter.
Proponents of government intervention argue that protecting manufacturing jobs is crucial for maintaining social stability and preserving the livelihoods of millions of workers. They contend that the manufacturing sector has historically been a cornerstone of many economies, providing stable, well-paying jobs for those without higher education. By shielding these jobs from the impacts of automation and globalization, governments can prevent widespread unemployment and the social unrest that often follows. Moreover, advocates of this view argue that maintaining a strong manufacturing base is essential for national security and economic independence.
On the other hand, those who believe change is inevitable point to the long history of technological advancements and economic shifts that have reshaped industries throughout history. They argue that attempting to protect jobs from automation and globalization is not only futile but potentially harmful to long-term economic growth. This perspective emphasizes the importance of adapting to new technologies and global market conditions, suggesting that resources would be better spent on retraining workers and investing in emerging industries rather than propping up declining sectors.
In my opinion, while the concerns of those advocating for job protection are valid, the reality of technological progress and global economic integration cannot be ignored. I believe that a balanced approach is necessary. Governments should focus on easing the transition for workers in the manufacturing sector rather than attempting to halt progress entirely. This could involve implementing robust retraining programs, providing support for workers to move into growing industries, and investing in education systems that prepare future generations for the jobs of tomorrow.
Furthermore, policymakers should work to create an environment that encourages innovation and the development of new industries that can provide high-quality jobs to replace those lost in traditional manufacturing. This might include incentives for companies investing in advanced manufacturing technologies or support for startups in emerging sectors.
In conclusion, while the desire to protect manufacturing jobs is understandable, it is more prudent to embrace change and focus on managing its impacts. By adopting policies that support worker adaptation and foster economic innovation, societies can navigate the challenges posed by automation and globalization while still maintaining a strong and resilient workforce.
(Word count: 399)
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
The question of whether governments should protect manufacturing jobs from automation and globalization is a complex issue. Some people think it’s important to save these jobs, while others believe that change can’t be stopped. This essay will look at both sides and give my opinion.
Those who support protecting manufacturing jobs say it’s important for several reasons. Firstly, these jobs provide a stable income for many people, especially those without a college education. If these jobs disappear, it could lead to high unemployment and social problems. Also, having a strong manufacturing sector is seen as important for a country’s economy and independence.
On the other hand, people who think change is inevitable point out that technology and globalization have always changed how we work. They argue that trying to stop this change is not only impossible but could also hurt the economy in the long run. Instead of protecting old jobs, they say we should focus on creating new ones and helping workers learn new skills.
In my opinion, while I understand the concerns about job losses, I think it’s more realistic to accept that change will happen. However, I don’t think governments should just stand by and do nothing. Instead, they should help workers adjust to these changes. This could include providing training programs to help people learn new skills, supporting the development of new industries that can create jobs, and improving education to prepare young people for future jobs.
It’s also important for governments to work with businesses to find ways to use new technologies in ways that create jobs rather than just replace them. For example, they could encourage companies to invest in advanced manufacturing that requires skilled workers.
In conclusion, while protecting manufacturing jobs might seem like a good idea, I believe it’s better to focus on helping workers and the economy adapt to change. By doing this, we can address the challenges of automation and globalization while still supporting workers and creating new opportunities.
(Word count: 329)
Key Points to Remember When Writing
-
Structure: Both essays follow a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs discussing each viewpoint, the writer’s opinion, and a conclusion. This structure is crucial for achieving a high band score.
-
Language: The Band 8-9 essay uses more sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structures, while the Band 6-7 essay uses simpler language. Both are correct, but the higher band score demonstrates a greater range of language.
-
Coherence and Cohesion: Both essays use linking words and phrases to connect ideas smoothly. The Band 8-9 essay does this more effectively, creating a more cohesive argument.
-
Task Response: Both essays address all parts of the question, discussing both viewpoints and providing a personal opinion. The Band 8-9 essay offers a more nuanced and well-developed argument.
-
Examples: While neither essay provides specific examples (which is not always necessary), the Band 8-9 essay offers more detailed explanations to support its points.
Vocabulary to Remember
Here are some key vocabulary items related to this topic:
-
Automation (noun) /ˌɔːtəˈmeɪʃn/: The use of machines and computers to do work that was previously done by people.
-
Globalization (noun) /ˌɡləʊbəlaɪˈzeɪʃn/: The process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale.
-
Intervention (noun) /ˌɪntəˈvenʃn/: The action or process of intervening, especially by a government in an economic issue.
-
Inevitable (adjective) /ɪnˈevɪtəbl/: Certain to happen; unavoidable.
-
Adapt (verb) /əˈdæpt/: To change or adjust to new conditions.
-
Retraining (noun) /ˌriːˈtreɪnɪŋ/: The process of learning new skills, especially to be able to do a different job.
-
Innovation (noun) /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃn/: The introduction of new ideas, methods, or things.
-
Resilient (adjective) /rɪˈzɪliənt/: Able to withstand or recover quickly from difficult conditions.
-
Incentive (noun) /ɪnˈsentɪv/: Something that encourages a person to do something.
-
Policymaker (noun) /ˈpɒləsiˌmeɪkə(r)/: A person responsible for making new rules, laws, etc., especially in politics.
Conclusion
Protecting jobs in the manufacturing sector is a complex and relevant topic for IELTS Writing Task 2. By understanding different perspectives and using appropriate vocabulary and structures, you can craft a well-argued essay on this subject. Remember to practice writing essays on similar topics, such as the impact of technology on employment or government policies for economic growth. You can also expect to see related questions about creating sustainable jobs in a digital economy or the role of green jobs in economic recovery.
To further improve your skills, try writing your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments section below. This practice will help you refine your arguments and get comfortable with the essay structure required for IELTS Writing Task 2.