IELTS Writing Task 2: How to Reduce Income Inequality During Economic Recovery (Sample Essays for Band 6-7 and 8-9)

The topic of reducing income inequality during economic recovery is increasingly relevant in today’s global economic landscape. This theme has appeared in various forms in past IELTS Writing Task 2 questions and is likely to continue being a popular subject for future exams. Its prevalence stems from its significance in contemporary socio-economic discussions and its potential to assess candidates’ abilities to analyze complex issues and propose solutions.

Based on trends in recent IELTS exams and the current global economic climate, we can expect to see questions related to income inequality and economic recovery. Let’s examine a sample question that aligns closely with this theme:

Some people believe that governments should focus on reducing income inequality during periods of economic recovery, while others argue that economic growth should be the primary goal. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analyzing the Question

This question requires candidates to:

1. Discuss the view that governments should prioritize reducing income inequality during economic recovery.
2. Discuss the opposing view that economic growth should be the main focus.
3. Provide their own opinion on the issue.

The question tests your ability to understand different perspectives on a complex economic issue, analyze their merits, and form a well-reasoned opinion.

Sample Essay for Band 8-9

In the aftermath of economic crises, governments face the challenging task of steering their nations towards recovery. While some advocate for a focus on reducing income inequality during these periods, others argue that prioritizing overall economic growth is more crucial. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint on this contentious issue.

Proponents of addressing income inequality during recovery periods argue that this approach leads to more sustainable and inclusive economic growth. They contend that reducing the wealth gap ensures that the benefits of recovery are more evenly distributed across society, thereby fostering social cohesion and political stability. Furthermore, a more equitable distribution of wealth can stimulate consumer spending across a broader segment of the population, potentially leading to a more robust and resilient economy in the long term.

On the other hand, those who prioritize economic growth argue that a rising tide lifts all boats. They believe that focusing on overall growth will create more jobs and opportunities, which will naturally lead to improved living standards for all segments of society. This view suggests that by expanding the economic pie, there will be more resources available to address inequality through social programs and progressive taxation once stability is achieved.

In my opinion, while both perspectives have merit, a balanced approach that considers both economic growth and income inequality is most effective. Governments should aim to implement policies that promote growth while simultaneously addressing the most pressing inequalities. For instance, investing in education and skills training can boost overall productivity while also providing opportunities for lower-income individuals to improve their economic prospects. Similarly, infrastructure projects can stimulate growth while creating jobs across various skill levels.

Moreover, it’s crucial to recognize that reducing inequality and promoting growth are not mutually exclusive goals. In fact, research suggests that excessive inequality can hinder economic growth by reducing social mobility and consumer spending. Therefore, by addressing inequality during the recovery phase, governments may actually be laying the groundwork for more sustainable long-term growth.

In conclusion, while the debate between prioritizing growth or equality is ongoing, I believe that a nuanced approach considering both factors is most beneficial. By implementing policies that promote inclusive growth, governments can work towards a recovery that not only boosts economic indicators but also enhances the well-being of all citizens, thus creating a more resilient and prosperous society for the future.

(Word count: 377)

Income inequality during economic recovery

Sample Essay for Band 6-7

The question of how governments should approach economic recovery is a topic of much debate. Some people think that reducing income inequality should be the main focus, while others believe that overall economic growth is more important. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who support focusing on reducing income inequality argue that it is important for a fair society. They believe that when the gap between rich and poor is smaller, everyone benefits. For example, if low-income people have more money, they can spend more, which helps the economy. Also, less inequality can lead to better social harmony and less crime.

On the other hand, people who prioritize economic growth say that it is more important to increase the overall wealth of a country. They think that when the economy grows, it creates more jobs and opportunities for everyone. This view suggests that even if there is still inequality, everyone’s situation can improve if the economy is doing well.

In my opinion, both approaches are important, but I think a balance is necessary. Governments should try to grow the economy while also taking steps to reduce inequality. For example, they could invest in education and job training programs that help people from all backgrounds get better jobs. They could also use tax policies that encourage economic growth but also ensure that wealthy individuals and corporations pay their fair share.

I believe that reducing inequality can actually help economic growth in the long run. When more people have a chance to participate fully in the economy, it can lead to more innovation and productivity. Also, a more equal society is often more stable, which is good for business and investment.

To conclude, while both reducing inequality and promoting economic growth are important goals, I think the best approach is to find ways to do both at the same time. This balanced strategy can lead to a stronger and fairer economy that benefits everyone.

(Word count: 329)

Key Points to Remember When Writing

For Band 8-9:

• Vocabulary: Use sophisticated vocabulary and idiomatic expressions accurately. For example, “foster social cohesion,” “stimulate consumer spending,” “a rising tide lifts all boats.”
• Grammar: Employ a wide range of complex structures. Use conditional sentences, passive voice, and various tenses appropriately.
• Coherence and Cohesion: Ensure smooth transitions between paragraphs and ideas. Use a variety of linking words and phrases.
• Task Response: Fully address all parts of the question with well-developed ideas and relevant examples.

For Band 6-7:

• Vocabulary: Use a mix of common and some less common vocabulary. For example, “social harmony,” “prioritize,” “overall wealth.”
• Grammar: Use a variety of sentence structures, but with less complexity than Band 8-9. Some errors may occur but should not impede understanding.
• Coherence and Cohesion: Use basic linking words correctly. Paragraphs should be logically organized.
• Task Response: Address all parts of the question, but ideas may be less fully developed compared to Band 8-9.

Important Vocabulary to Remember

1. Income inequality (noun) /ˈɪnkʌm ɪnɪˈkwɒlɪti/ – The extent to which income is distributed unevenly in a group of people
2. Economic recovery (noun) /ˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk rɪˈkʌvəri/ – The phase of the business cycle following a recession, during which an economy regains and exceeds peak employment and output levels
3. Progressive taxation (noun) /prəˈɡresɪv tækˈseɪʃən/ – A tax system where the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases
4. Social cohesion (noun) /ˈsəʊʃəl kəʊˈhiːʒən/ – The willingness of members of society to cooperate with each other
5. Consumer spending (noun) /kənˈsjuːmə ˈspendɪŋ/ – The amount of money spent by households in an economy
6. Inclusive growth (noun) /ɪnˈkluːsɪv ɡrəʊθ/ – Economic growth that creates opportunity for all segments of the population
7. Wealth gap (noun) /welθ ɡæp/ – The difference in wealth between different groups in society
8. Social mobility (noun) /ˈsəʊʃəl məʊˈbɪləti/ – The ability of individuals or groups to move between different levels in society
9. Economic indicators (noun) /ˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk ˈɪndɪkeɪtəz/ – Statistics used to determine the overall state of an economy
10. Fiscal policy (noun) /ˈfɪskəl ˈpɒlɪsi/ – The use of government spending and taxation to influence the economy

In conclusion, the topic of reducing income inequality during economic recovery is a complex and relevant issue for IELTS Writing Task 2. By understanding the key arguments, using appropriate vocabulary, and structuring your essay effectively, you can craft a compelling response to questions on this theme. Remember to practice writing essays on similar topics, such as “The role of government in promoting economic equality” or “Balancing economic growth and social welfare.” Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and further discussion.