Alternative medicine research is a topic that has gained significant attention in recent IELTS exams. Based on trends observed in past tests and discussions on reputable IELTS preparation websites, this subject is likely to appear more frequently in future Writing Task 2 prompts. Let’s explore a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:
Some people think that governments should spend money on researching alternative forms of energy. Others believe that this money is better spent on improving and reducing the cost of existing energy sources. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Analyzing the Question
This question touches on the importance of alternative medicine research, although it focuses on energy sources rather than medicine. The task requires candidates to:
- Discuss the view that governments should fund research into alternative energy sources
- Discuss the opposing view that improving existing energy sources is a better use of funds
- Provide and justify their own opinion on the matter
Let’s examine three sample essays of varying quality to understand how to approach this task effectively.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
In the ongoing debate about energy resource allocation, some argue for government investment in alternative energy research, while others advocate for improving existing sources. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own stance on this critical issue.
Proponents of alternative energy research argue that investing in new technologies is crucial for long-term sustainability. They contend that fossil fuels are finite and environmentally damaging, making it imperative to develop cleaner, renewable alternatives such as solar, wind, and hydrogen power. Moreover, breakthroughs in these fields could lead to energy independence for many nations, reducing geopolitical tensions and fostering economic growth. The potential for innovation in this sector also promises job creation and new industrial opportunities.
On the other hand, those favoring improvement of existing energy sources argue that this approach is more pragmatic and cost-effective in the short to medium term. They posit that enhancing the efficiency and reducing the environmental impact of current technologies could yield immediate benefits without the uncertainties associated with new, unproven alternatives. Furthermore, existing infrastructure and expertise in conventional energy production could be leveraged, minimizing disruption and maximizing return on investment.
In my opinion, a balanced approach that combines both strategies would be most beneficial. While it is crucial to invest in alternative energy research for long-term sustainability, we cannot overlook the immediate need for cleaner and more efficient conventional energy sources. Governments should allocate funds to both areas, with a gradual shift towards alternative energy as technologies mature. This dual approach would ensure energy security in the present while paving the way for a more sustainable future.
In conclusion, the debate between funding alternative energy research and improving existing sources presents a false dichotomy. A nuanced strategy that addresses both immediate needs and long-term sustainability is essential for tackling the complex challenges of global energy demands.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
The topic of energy research is very important today. Some people think governments should spend money on new types of energy, but others say it’s better to improve what we already have. I will discuss both sides and give my opinion.
There are good reasons to research new energy types. Our current energy sources like oil and coal are running out and causing pollution. If we find new, clean energy sources, it could help the environment and give us energy for a long time. Also, new energy technology could create jobs and help the economy.
However, some people think it’s better to make our current energy sources better. They say this is cheaper and faster than inventing new things. We already have the equipment and knowledge for these energy types, so improving them could give quick results. Making coal and oil cleaner and more efficient could help right now.
In my opinion, we should do both things. It’s important to look for new energy sources for the future, but we also need to make our current energy better now. Governments should spend money on both areas. This way, we can have cleaner energy now and also prepare for the future.
To conclude, both researching new energy and improving current sources are important. We shouldn’t choose one over the other, but instead, do both to solve our energy problems.
Sample Essay 3 (Band 5-6)
Energy is very important for everyone. Some people say government should spend money on new energy research. Other people say it’s better to make old energy better and cheaper. I will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.
New energy research is good because we need new ways to make energy. Oil and coal are bad for the environment and will finish one day. If we find new energy, it can be clean and last for a long time. This can help the Earth and give us energy forever.
But some people think it’s better to make old energy better. They say this is easier and costs less money. We know how to use old energy already, so making it better is faster. If we make coal and oil cleaner, it can help us now.
I think both ideas are good. We should look for new energy and also make old energy better. Government should give money for both things. This way, we can have good energy now and in the future.
In conclusion, new energy research and making old energy better are both important. We should do both to solve energy problems.
Explanation of Band Scores
Band 8-9 Essay:
This essay demonstrates excellent language use, coherent organization, and in-depth analysis. It:
- Presents a clear and balanced discussion of both viewpoints
- Uses sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structures
- Provides a nuanced opinion with well-developed supporting arguments
- Maintains coherence and cohesion throughout
- Uses appropriate academic style and tone
Band 6-7 Essay:
This essay shows good language control and addresses all parts of the task, but lacks the sophistication of the higher band essay. It:
- Discusses both viewpoints adequately
- Uses a mix of simple and complex sentences
- Presents a clear opinion with some supporting ideas
- Has generally good coherence and cohesion
- Uses mostly appropriate vocabulary with some errors
Band 5-6 Essay:
This essay addresses the task but with limited development and simple language. It:
- Presents basic ideas on both viewpoints
- Uses mostly simple sentences and basic vocabulary
- Gives an opinion but with minimal support
- Has some coherence but may be repetitive
- Contains noticeable errors in grammar and vocabulary use
Key Vocabulary to Remember
-
Alternative energy (noun) – Energy from sources other than fossil fuels
/ɔːlˈtɜːnətɪv ˈenədʒi/ -
Sustainability (noun) – The ability to maintain or support a process continuously over time
/səˌsteɪnəˈbɪləti/ -
Renewable (adjective) – (Of a resource) not depleted when used
/rɪˈnjuːəbl/ -
Pragmatic (adjective) – Dealing with things sensibly and realistically
/præɡˈmætɪk/ -
Infrastructure (noun) – The basic physical and organizational structures needed for operation
/ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃə(r)/ -
Efficiency (noun) – The state or quality of being efficient
/ɪˈfɪʃnsi/ -
Geopolitical (adjective) – Relating to politics, especially international relations, as influenced by geographical factors
/ˌdʒiːəʊpəˈlɪtɪkl/ -
Innovation (noun) – The action or process of innovating
/ˌɪnəˈveɪʃn/ -
Dichotomy (noun) – A division or contrast between two things that are represented as being opposed or entirely different
/daɪˈkɒtəmi/ -
Nuanced (adjective) – Characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression
/ˈnjuːɑːnst/
In conclusion, the topic of alternative energy research versus improving existing sources is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on similar themes such as the ethics of stem cell research or the importance of science communication in public understanding. These topics share common ground in discussing scientific research and public policy.
For further practice, consider writing an essay on the following related topic:
Some people believe that alternative medicine should be more widely researched and promoted, while others think resources should be focused on conventional medical treatments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This prompt combines elements of Alternative medicine vs. conventional treatment and research funding allocation, providing excellent practice for similar IELTS Writing Task 2 questions. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion.