Language preservation has become an increasingly common topic in IELTS Writing Task 2, appearing in approximately 15% of recent exam questions. This trend reflects growing global concerns about impact of language loss on cultural identity. Let’s examine a frequently tested question and analyze sample responses across different band scores.
Some people believe that governments should spend money on preserving minority languages, while others think this money should be used for other purposes. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Analysis of the Question
- Topic: Government funding for minority language preservation
- Task: Discussion + Opinion
- Key elements to address:
- Arguments for government spending on language preservation
- Arguments against such spending
- Personal stance with justification
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8.5)
The allocation of government resources for preserving minority languages is a contentious issue that merits careful consideration. While some argue that such funding is essential for cultural preservation, others contend that these resources could be better utilized elsewhere. I believe that maintaining linguistic diversity through government support is crucial, though it should be balanced with other priorities.
Those who support government funding for minority languages often emphasize the intrinsic connection between language and cultural identity. When a language dies, centuries of traditional knowledge, customs, and ways of thinking can be irretrievably lost. Furthermore, linguistic diversity enriches our global cultural heritage and provides valuable insights into human cognition and communication. The importance of cultural preservation in the digital age becomes even more critical as globalization accelerates.
Conversely, opponents argue that government funds could be better spent on pressing needs such as healthcare, education, or infrastructure development. They contend that in an increasingly interconnected world, the practical value of maintaining minority languages diminishes, especially when resources are limited. Some suggest that natural language evolution should take its course without government intervention.
In my view, while other governmental responsibilities are undoubtedly important, the preservation of minority languages deserves dedicated funding. The loss of a language represents an irreversible diminishment of human cultural heritage that cannot be restored once lost. However, I believe the approach should be strategic and cost-effective, perhaps incorporating digital technologies and community-based initiatives to maximize impact while managing costs.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6.5)
Many people have different opinions about whether governments should use money to protect minority languages or spend it on other things. This is an important issue that needs to be discussed.
Some people think governments should protect minority languages. They say these languages are important for culture and history. When old languages disappear, we lose important information about how people lived in the past. Also, many families want their children to speak their traditional language.
However, other people think this money can be used better. They want governments to spend more on things like hospitals, schools, and roads. These things help everyone in society, not just small groups. Also, English is becoming more important in the world, so some think learning minority languages is not useful.
I think governments should try to do both things. They can save some money for protecting languages while also spending on other important things. Maybe they can find cheaper ways to protect languages, like using computers or teaching them in normal schools.
Educational infographic showing methods of preserving minority languages
Vocabulary Analysis
- contentious (adj) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing or likely to cause disagreement
- irretrievably (adv) /ˌɪrɪˈtriːvəbli/ – impossible to recover or restore
- diminishment (n) /dɪˈmɪnɪʃmənt/ – reduction or lessening
- intrinsic (adj) /ɪnˈtrɪnsɪk/ – belonging naturally
- strategic (adj) /strəˈtiːdʒɪk/ – carefully planned to achieve a particular purpose
Key Differences Between Band Scores
-
Band 8.5 essay demonstrates:
- Sophisticated vocabulary
- Complex sentence structures
- Clear progression of ideas
- Strong cohesion
- Nuanced arguments
-
Band 6.5 essay shows:
- Simple but clear language
- Basic argument structure
- Limited range of expressions
- Some repetition
- Less sophisticated reasoning
For additional practice, consider writing about should indigenous languages be preserved and share your essays in the comments below. This topic may appear in various forms, such as discussing the role of technology in language preservation or exploring the economic aspects of language conservation programs.
