IELTS Writing Task 2: Mastering Essays on Open Access to Scientific Research (With Sample Band 6, 7, and 8 Essays)

The importance of open access to scientific research is a topic that has gained significant traction in recent years. It’s a subject that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays, often framed within discussions …

Open Access Research

The importance of open access to scientific research is a topic that has gained significant traction in recent years. It’s a subject that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays, often framed within discussions about education, technology, or societal progress. Based on an analysis of past IELTS exams and current trends, we can expect this theme to continue appearing in future tests, making it crucial for IELTS candidates to be well-prepared to tackle such questions.

Let’s examine a typical IELTS Writing Task 2 question on this subject and explore how to craft effective responses across different band scores.

Analyzing the Question

Some people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

This question touches on the core issue of open access to scientific research by asking about who should control such research. It’s a common type of IELTS question that requires you to present and support your opinion on a complex issue.

Key points to consider:

  • The role of governments in scientific research
  • The role of private companies in scientific research
  • The potential benefits and drawbacks of each approach
  • The implications for open access to research findings

Open Access ResearchOpen Access Research

Sample Essay 1: Band 8

The debate over whether scientific research should be conducted and managed by governments or private entities is a crucial one in our rapidly advancing world. While both approaches have merits, I largely disagree with the notion that governments should have sole control over scientific endeavors.

Governments undoubtedly play a vital role in scientific research. They can fund large-scale projects that might not be immediately profitable, such as space exploration or fundamental physics research. Moreover, government-funded research is often more transparent and accessible to the public, aligning with the principle of open access to scientific knowledge. For instance, NASA’s research findings are freely available, benefiting scientists worldwide.

However, private companies bring unique advantages to the scientific landscape. They often have more flexibility in resource allocation and can respond more quickly to emerging research opportunities. Additionally, the competitive nature of the private sector can drive innovation at a pace that government bureaucracies might struggle to match. The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines by pharmaceutical companies is a testament to this agility.

Private Company ResearchPrivate Company Research

Furthermore, a diverse research ecosystem that includes both public and private entities can lead to more robust scientific progress. Different funding sources and research approaches can result in a wider range of investigations and potentially more groundbreaking discoveries. For example, while government-funded universities might focus on foundational research, private companies could concentrate on practical applications, creating a symbiotic relationship that benefits society as a whole.

It’s crucial to note that private research doesn’t necessarily mean closed access. Many companies collaborate with academic institutions or participate in open-source initiatives. The key is to establish regulatory frameworks that encourage transparency and knowledge sharing while still allowing for intellectual property protection where necessary.

In conclusion, while government involvement in scientific research is important, I believe that a balanced approach incorporating both public and private efforts is most beneficial. This diverse ecosystem can foster innovation, ensure a wide range of research priorities, and ultimately lead to greater scientific progress and societal benefit.

(Word count: 309)

Essay Analysis:

This essay demonstrates characteristics of a Band 8 response:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position that disagrees with government-only control of scientific research.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively (e.g., “However”, “Furthermore”, “For example”).

  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately (e.g., “vital role”, “transparent and accessible”, “symbiotic relationship”).

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A variety of complex structures are used accurately (e.g., “While both approaches have merits”, “It’s crucial to note that”).

Sample Essay 2: Band 7

The control of scientific research by governments or private companies is a topic of much debate. While both have their advantages, I partially agree that governments should have a significant role in scientific research, but I don’t believe they should have complete control.

Government involvement in scientific research has several benefits. Firstly, governments can fund large-scale projects that might not be profitable in the short term but could have significant long-term benefits for society. For example, research into rare diseases or climate change often requires substantial funding without immediate financial returns. Secondly, government-funded research is usually more accessible to the public, promoting the idea of open access to scientific knowledge.

Government-Funded ResearchGovernment-Funded Research

However, private companies also play a crucial role in scientific advancement. They often have more flexibility and can move faster than government organizations. This speed can be vital in fields like technology or medicine where rapid innovation is crucial. For instance, private pharmaceutical companies were able to develop COVID-19 vaccines quickly due to their resources and flexibility.

A combination of government and private research might be the best approach. This could ensure a balance between long-term, fundamental research and more immediate, application-focused studies. It could also promote healthy competition and diverse approaches to scientific problems.

In conclusion, while governments should have a significant role in scientific research, especially in areas of public interest, I believe that a mix of government and private research efforts is likely to produce the best results for scientific progress and society as a whole.

(Word count: 253)

Essay Analysis:

This essay demonstrates characteristics of a Band 7 response:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses all parts of the task and presents a clear position.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized, but the links between ideas could be more sophisticated.

  3. Lexical Resource: A sufficient range of vocabulary is used with some flexibility and precision.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is used, generally with good control.

Sample Essay 3: Band 6

Scientific research is very important for our society. Some people think governments should do and control this research, not private companies. I partly agree with this idea.

Governments doing scientific research has some good points. They can spend money on big projects that might not make money quickly. For example, they can research things like space or new energy that take a long time. Also, when the government does research, usually more people can see the results. This is good for everyone.

But private companies doing research is also important. They can often work faster than the government. This is good in areas like making new medicines or technology. Private companies also have their own money to use for research, which can help when governments don’t have enough money.

I think both governments and private companies should do research. This way, we can have different kinds of research happening. The government can focus on big, long-term projects, while private companies can work on things that might be useful more quickly.

In conclusion, I believe that scientific research should be done by both governments and private companies. This will help make sure we have different kinds of research and can solve more problems.

(Word count: 203)

Essay Analysis:

This essay demonstrates characteristics of a Band 6 response:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses the task, but the position could be clearer and more fully developed.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a clear overall progression, but paragraphing could be more fully developed.

  3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is adequate for the task, but lacks precision in some areas.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex structures is attempted, but errors are noticeable.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Scientific research (noun) – /ˌsaɪənˈtɪfɪk rɪˈsɜːrtʃ/ – Systematic investigation to establish facts in science

  2. Open access (noun) – /ˈəʊpən ˈækses/ – Unrestricted access to research publications and data

  3. Innovation (noun) – /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃn/ – The introduction of new ideas or methods

  4. Transparency (noun) – /trænsˈpærənsi/ – The quality of being open and honest

  5. Fundamental research (noun) – /ˌfʌndəˈmentl rɪˈsɜːrtʃ/ – Research aimed at improving scientific theories

  6. Intellectual property (noun) – /ˌɪntəˈlektʃuəl ˈprɒpəti/ – Creations of the mind, such as inventions and designs

  7. Collaborative (adjective) – /kəˈlæbərətɪv/ – Involving two or more parties working together

  8. Bureaucracy (noun) – /bjʊəˈrɒkrəsi/ – A system of government with many complicated rules and processes

  9. Symbiotic (adjective) – /ˌsɪmbaɪˈɒtɪk/ – Involving interaction between different organisms living in close association

  10. Regulatory framework (noun) – /ˈreɡjələtəri ˈfreɪmwɜːk/ – A system of regulations and guidelines governing a particular field

Conclusion

The importance of open access to scientific research is a topic that’s likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. As we’ve seen, it can be approached from various angles, such as discussing who should control research, the benefits of open access, or the balance between public and private research efforts.

To prepare for potential questions on this topic, consider practicing with prompts like:

  1. “Some people believe that all scientific research should be freely available to the public. To what extent do you agree or disagree?”

  2. “Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of making all government-funded research open access.”

  3. “In some countries, private companies are required to share their research findings. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?”

Remember, the key to success in IELTS Writing Task 2 is not just about knowledge, but also about how you structure your ideas and use language effectively. Practice writing essays on these topics, focusing on clear organization, varied vocabulary, and accurate grammar. Don’t forget to time yourself to ensure you can complete the task within the 40 minutes allocated in the actual test.

We encourage you to try writing your own essay on one of these topics and share it in the comments section below. This is an excellent way to practice and potentially receive feedback from others preparing for IELTS.