The topic of saving for future medical expenses is increasingly relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on recent trends, this theme has appeared in various forms, reflecting its growing importance in global health and financial discussions. Let’s explore a sample question that encapsulates this topic and analyze how to approach it effectively for different band scores.
Some people believe that individuals should save money for their own future healthcare costs, while others think the government should cover all medical expenses. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analyzing the Question
This question presents a classic IELTS Writing Task 2 format, asking candidates to discuss two opposing views and provide their own opinion. The topic combines elements of personal finance, healthcare policy, and social responsibility. To excel in this task, candidates must:
- Clearly present both viewpoints
- Provide balanced arguments for each side
- Express a personal opinion with supporting reasons
- Use relevant examples and vocabulary related to healthcare and finance
Now, let’s examine sample essays for different band scores, starting with a high-band response.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
In the ongoing debate about healthcare financing, some advocate for individual responsibility in saving for medical expenses, while others argue for comprehensive government coverage. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint on this critical issue.
Proponents of individual savings for healthcare argue that this approach promotes personal responsibility and financial prudence. When people set aside funds for potential medical needs, they are more likely to make healthier lifestyle choices and engage in preventive care, potentially reducing overall healthcare costs. Moreover, this system allows for greater flexibility and choice in medical treatments, as individuals can allocate their savings according to their specific health priorities.
On the other hand, those favoring government-funded healthcare emphasize the principle of universal access to medical services. This model ensures that all citizens, regardless of their financial status, can receive necessary treatments without the burden of crippling medical debt. Additionally, a centralized system can negotiate better prices for medications and services, potentially leading to more cost-effective healthcare delivery on a national scale.
In my opinion, a hybrid approach that combines elements of both systems would be most beneficial. While I believe in the importance of savings for long-term security, including for health-related expenses, I also recognize the critical role of government in ensuring basic healthcare access for all. A system where individuals contribute to personal health savings accounts, supplemented by a government safety net for catastrophic or chronic conditions, could strike a balance between personal responsibility and societal support.
This approach would encourage financial planning and health-conscious behavior while safeguarding against the potentially devastating impact of major medical events. It would also align with the importance of emergency fund savings, which can provide a crucial buffer for unexpected health issues.
In conclusion, while both individual savings and government funding have their merits in healthcare financing, a balanced system that incorporates elements of both could provide the most comprehensive and equitable solution. This would ensure that citizens are both empowered to take charge of their health finances and protected from catastrophic medical expenses.
(Word count: 377)
Explanation of Band 8-9 Score
This essay demonstrates several key features that contribute to its high band score:
Clear structure: The essay follows a logical progression, introducing the topic, discussing both viewpoints, presenting a personal opinion, and concluding effectively.
Balanced argument: Both perspectives are given equal consideration with valid points for each.
Sophisticated vocabulary: The use of phrases like “financial prudence,” “universal access,” and “catastrophic or chronic conditions” showcases a wide-ranging vocabulary.
Complex sentence structures: The essay employs a mix of simple and complex sentences, demonstrating advanced language proficiency.
Coherence and cohesion: Ideas flow smoothly with appropriate use of linking words and phrases.
Relevant examples: The essay provides specific examples to support its arguments, such as the potential for cost negotiation in a centralized system.
Clear opinion: The writer’s stance is clearly stated and well-supported with reasoning.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
The question of who should pay for healthcare costs is a big issue in many countries. Some people think individuals should save money for their own medical expenses, while others believe the government should pay for everything. This essay will look at both sides and give my opinion.
Those who support individual savings for healthcare say it makes people more responsible. When people save their own money for medical needs, they might try to live healthier lives to avoid getting sick. Also, if people have their own savings, they can choose the treatments they want without waiting for the government.
On the other hand, people who think the government should pay for all medical costs believe this is fairer. They argue that everyone should have access to healthcare, even if they don’t have much money. This way, poor people won’t avoid going to the doctor because they can’t afford it. Also, when the government manages healthcare, it might be able to make it cheaper for everyone.
In my opinion, I think a mix of both ideas could work best. People should try to save some money for their health, but the government should also help. This is because some illnesses are very expensive to treat, and most people can’t save enough for these big costs. The government could provide basic healthcare for everyone and help with the cost of serious illnesses.
Healthcare savings and government support
This system would encourage people to take care of their health and save money, but also make sure that everyone can get the care they need. It’s important to find a balance between personal responsibility and how personal savings affect economic stability of the country.
To conclude, while both individual savings and government funding for healthcare have good points, I believe a system that uses both approaches would be the best solution. This would help ensure that everyone can access healthcare while also encouraging people to be responsible for their health.
(Word count: 367)
Explanation of Band 6-7 Score
This essay demonstrates several characteristics that place it in the Band 6-7 range:
Clear structure: The essay addresses all parts of the task, including both viewpoints and a personal opinion.
Adequate vocabulary: The language used is clear and generally appropriate, though less sophisticated than the Band 8-9 essay.
Some complex sentences: The essay includes a mix of simple and complex sentences, showing some range in structure.
Basic coherence: Ideas are presented logically, though transitions between paragraphs could be smoother.
Relevant arguments: The essay provides relevant points for both sides of the argument.
Clear opinion: The writer’s position is stated clearly in the fourth paragraph.
Room for improvement: To reach a higher band, the essay could include more specific examples, more sophisticated vocabulary, and more complex sentence structures.
Key Vocabulary to Remember
- Healthcare financing (noun) – /ˈhelθkeə ˈfaɪnænsɪŋ/ – The system of funding healthcare services
- Preventive care (noun) – /prɪˈventɪv keə/ – Medical services that prevent illness or detect disease early
- Universal access (noun) – /ˌjuːnɪˈvɜːsl ˈækses/ – The ability for all people to obtain services
- Catastrophic expenses (adjective + noun) – /ˌkætəˈstrɒfɪk ɪkˈspensɪz/ – Extremely high costs, often related to serious medical conditions
- Financial prudence (noun) – /faɪˈnænʃl ˈpruːdns/ – Wise and careful management of money
- Centralized system (adjective + noun) – /ˈsentrəlaɪzd ˈsɪstəm/ – A system controlled by a central authority
- Hybrid approach (adjective + noun) – /ˈhaɪbrɪd əˈprəʊtʃ/ – A method combining two or more different systems
- Crippling debt (adjective + noun) – /ˈkrɪplɪŋ det/ – Debt so large it severely limits one’s ability to function financially
- Safety net (noun) – /ˈseɪfti net/ – A system to help people in financial difficulty
- Equitable solution (adjective + noun) – /ˈekwɪtəbl səˈluːʃn/ – A fair and impartial resolution
In conclusion, the topic of saving for future medical expenses is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. Candidates should be prepared to discuss various aspects of healthcare financing, including personal responsibility, government roles, and the balance between individual and societal needs. To practice, consider writing essays on related topics such as:
- The role of private health insurance in national healthcare systems
- The impact of an aging population on healthcare costs and policies
- The importance of preventive healthcare in reducing long-term medical expenses
Remember to share your practice essays in the comments section below for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you refine your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS Writing Task 2.