Mastering IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Regulating Drone Use in Public (Band 6-9)

Regulating drone use in public has become an increasingly relevant topic in recent years, as the popularity and accessibility of drones continue to grow. This subject has appeared in several IELTS Writing Task 2 questions, …

Drone regulation infographic

Regulating drone use in public has become an increasingly relevant topic in recent years, as the popularity and accessibility of drones continue to grow. This subject has appeared in several IELTS Writing Task 2 questions, and its frequency is likely to increase in future exams due to its contemporary nature and widespread impact on society.

Based on our research of past IELTS exams and current trends, we’ve identified a highly probable question that could appear in future tests:

Some people believe that the use of drones in public spaces should be strictly regulated, while others think they should be allowed freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Let’s analyze this question and provide sample essays for different band scores to help you prepare effectively for your IELTS Writing Task 2.

Analyzing the Question

This question falls under the “discuss both views and give your opinion” category, which requires you to:

  1. Explain the arguments for strict regulation of drones in public spaces
  2. Present the reasons why some believe drones should be allowed freely
  3. Provide your own perspective on the issue

It’s crucial to address all parts of the question and maintain a balanced approach while clearly stating your opinion.

Sample Essays

Band 8-9 Essay

Drone regulation infographicDrone regulation infographic

Unmanned aerial vehicles, commonly known as drones, have become increasingly prevalent in our skies, sparking a debate about their regulation in public spaces. While some advocate for strict control, others argue for unrestricted use. This essay will examine both perspectives before offering a nuanced view on this complex issue.

Proponents of strict drone regulation cite several compelling reasons for their stance. Primarily, they emphasize the potential safety hazards posed by inexperienced operators or malfunctioning devices. A drone crash in a crowded area could cause serious injuries or property damage. Moreover, privacy concerns are paramount, as drones equipped with cameras could infringe upon personal space and violate individuals’ right to privacy. Additionally, unrestricted drone use could interfere with air traffic, posing risks to commercial and private aircraft.

Conversely, those advocating for unrestricted drone use argue that over-regulation stifles innovation and limits the potential benefits of this technology. They contend that drones have numerous positive applications, including emergency response, environmental monitoring, and commercial deliveries. Restricting their use, they argue, could hamper these advancements and deprive society of valuable services. Furthermore, they believe that responsible drone operators should not be penalized for the actions of a few irresponsible users.

In my opinion, a balanced approach is necessary to harness the benefits of drone technology while mitigating its risks. I believe that moderate regulation, rather than either extreme, is the most prudent course of action. This could involve implementing a licensing system for drone operators, establishing no-fly zones in sensitive areas, and requiring built-in safety features such as collision avoidance systems. Such measures would address safety and privacy concerns without unduly restricting the technology’s potential.

In conclusion, while the debate over drone regulation in public spaces is complex, a nuanced approach that balances safety and innovation is essential. By implementing thoughtful regulations that address legitimate concerns while allowing for responsible use, we can ensure that society reaps the benefits of drone technology without compromising public safety or individual privacy.

(Word count: 309)

Band 6-7 Essay

The increasing popularity of drones has led to a debate about how they should be used in public areas. Some people think there should be strict rules, while others believe drones should be used freely. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who support strict regulation of drones have some good reasons. Firstly, they worry about safety. If a drone falls from the sky, it could hurt people or damage property. Also, drones with cameras might invade people’s privacy by taking pictures or videos without permission. Another concern is that drones could interfere with airplanes and helicopters, causing accidents.

On the other hand, people who think drones should be used freely also have valid points. They believe that drones can be very useful in many ways. For example, drones can help in emergencies, like finding lost people or delivering medical supplies. They can also be used for fun, like taking aerial photographs or racing. These people think that too many rules will stop people from using drones for good purposes.

In my opinion, I think we need some rules for drones, but not too many. We should find a balance between safety and freedom. For example, we could have a system where people need to get a license to fly a drone, just like driving a car. We could also have some areas where drones are not allowed, like near airports or private homes. This way, we can keep people safe and protect their privacy, but still allow drones to be used for good reasons.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe that moderate regulation of drones in public spaces is the best solution. This approach can help us enjoy the benefits of drones while minimizing the risks.

(Word count: 287)

Band 5-6 Essay

Drones are becoming more popular these days. Some people think we need strict rules for using drones in public, but others think we should use them freely. I will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.

People who want strict rules for drones have some reasons. They think drones can be dangerous. If a drone falls, it might hurt someone. Also, drones with cameras can take pictures of people without asking. This is not good for privacy. Some people also worry that drones might cause problems for airplanes.

But other people think we should use drones freely. They say drones can help us in many ways. For example, drones can find lost people or deliver things. They can also take nice pictures from the air. These people think too many rules will stop us from using drones for good things.

I think we need some rules for drones, but not too many. We should be careful, but also let people use drones for good reasons. Maybe we can make people get a special card to use a drone, like a driving license. We can also say some places are not for drones, like near airports.

In the end, I think we need some rules for drones in public, but we should still let people use them for good reasons. This way, we can be safe and also use drones to help us.

(Word count: 222)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay Explanation

This essay demonstrates excellent writing skills and a comprehensive understanding of the topic, warranting a high band score:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and clearly presenting the writer’s opinion.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout the essay. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively.
  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used with full flexibility and precision. The essay includes less common lexical items like “unmanned aerial vehicles,” “nuanced view,” and “stifles innovation.”
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A wide range of grammatical structures is used accurately. Complex sentences are handled with full control, and there are no noticeable errors.

Band 6-7 Essay Explanation

This essay demonstrates good writing skills but lacks some of the sophistication of the higher band essay:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses all parts of the task, but the ideas are less fully developed than in the Band 8-9 essay.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a clear overall progression, but some paragraphs are better linked than others.
  3. Lexical Resource: A sufficient range of vocabulary is used appropriately, but it lacks the precision and sophistication of the higher band essay.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used, with generally good control. There are no major grammatical errors.

Band 5-6 Essay Explanation

This essay demonstrates basic writing skills but has several limitations:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses the task, but some points are underdeveloped.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There is a basic structure, but the linking of ideas is not always clear.
  3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is limited and repetitive in places.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Mainly simple sentences are used, with occasional attempts at complex structures. There are some grammatical errors, but they do not impede communication.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Regulation (noun) /ˌreɡjʊˈleɪʃən/ – official rules or laws about what is allowed
  2. Prevalence (noun) /ˈprevələns/ – the fact of being very common or widespread
  3. Infringe (verb) /ɪnˈfrɪndʒ/ – to break a law or rule, or to limit someone’s rights
  4. Mitigate (verb) /ˈmɪtɪɡeɪt/ – to make something less harmful, serious, or bad
  5. Nuanced (adjective) /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ – characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression
  6. Stifle (verb) /ˈstaɪfəl/ – to prevent something from happening or developing
  7. Prudent (adjective) /ˈpruːdənt/ – careful and avoiding risks
  8. Harness (verb) /ˈhɑːrnəs/ – to control and use the force or strength of something to produce power or achieve something
  9. Compromise (verb) /ˈkɑːmprəmaɪz/ – to accept that you cannot have everything you want and that you must give up some of your demands
  10. Invasive (adjective) /ɪnˈveɪsɪv/ – tending to spread in a harmful way

Conclusion

The topic of regulating drone use in public spaces is likely to remain relevant in future IELTS exams. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on similar topics such as:

  • The impact of new technologies on privacy and security
  • Balancing innovation and public safety in emerging technologies
  • The role of government in regulating personal technology use

Remember to analyze the question carefully, address all parts of the task, and use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures appropriate to your target band score. Practice writing your own essays and share them in the comments section below for feedback and discussion with other learners. This active engagement will help you improve your writing skills and prepare more effectively for your IELTS exam.

For more information on regulating drone use for public safety, challenges of regulating drones in public spaces, and the role of government in regulating technology, check out our related articles.