In recent years, the topic of regulating fast food marketing to protect public health has gained significant traction in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. This subject has appeared multiple times in past tests and is likely to remain relevant in future exams due to its global importance. Let’s explore this topic in depth, providing you with high-quality sample essays and comprehensive analysis to help you excel in your IELTS Writing Task 2.
Regulating Fast Food Marketing
Analyzing the Task 2 Question
Let’s focus on a common question type related to this topic:
Some people think that governments should regulate the marketing of fast food to protect people’s health. Others believe that individuals should be responsible for their own diet choices. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This question presents a classic IELTS Task 2 structure: discussing two opposing views and providing your own opinion. The key aspects to address are:
- Government regulation of fast food marketing
- Individual responsibility for diet choices
- Your personal stance on the issue
Now, let’s examine three sample essays of varying quality, demonstrating different band scores.
Sample Essay 1: Band 8-9 Level
Fast food has become ubiquitous in modern society, raising concerns about its impact on public health. While some advocate for government intervention in regulating fast food marketing, others argue that dietary choices should remain a matter of personal responsibility. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.
Proponents of government regulation argue that aggressive marketing of unhealthy food products contributes significantly to the obesity epidemic and related health issues. They contend that restrictions on advertising, especially those targeting children, could help curb the overconsumption of calorie-dense, nutrient-poor foods. For instance, the UK’s ban on junk food advertising before 9 pm has shown promising results in reducing children’s exposure to such promotions. Furthermore, mandatory health warnings on packaging, similar to those on cigarettes, could increase consumer awareness and potentially influence healthier choices.
On the other hand, those who favor individual responsibility maintain that people should have the autonomy to make their own dietary decisions without government interference. They argue that education and personal discipline are more effective long-term solutions than regulatory measures. This perspective emphasizes the importance of nutritional literacy and self-control in managing one’s diet. Additionally, critics of regulation often point out that overly restrictive policies may infringe on commercial free speech and potentially harm the fast food industry, which provides employment and economic benefits.
In my opinion, a balanced approach combining elements of both views is most appropriate. While I believe that individuals should ultimately be responsible for their food choices, I also recognize the powerful influence of marketing on consumer behavior, especially among vulnerable groups like children. Therefore, I support moderate regulation of fast food marketing, such as limiting advertisements during children’s programming and requiring clear nutritional information on menus. These measures can help create an environment that supports informed decision-making without completely removing personal choice.
In conclusion, the regulation of fast food marketing is a complex issue that requires a nuanced approach. By implementing targeted regulations while still preserving individual freedom of choice, governments can strike a balance between protecting public health and respecting personal autonomy.
(Word count: 329)
Analysis of Band 8-9 Essay
This essay demonstrates excellent qualities that justify a high band score:
-
Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.
-
Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphing and effective use of cohesive devices (e.g., “On the other hand”, “Furthermore”, “In conclusion”).
-
Lexical Resource: The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary accurately and appropriately (e.g., “ubiquitous”, “autonomy”, “nutritional literacy”).
-
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay demonstrates a wide range of complex structures used accurately (e.g., “While I believe that individuals should ultimately be responsible…”, “By implementing targeted regulations while still preserving…”).
-
Development of Ideas: Each main point is well-developed with relevant examples and explanations.
Sample Essay 2: Band 6-7 Level
Some people think the government should control fast food advertising to protect health, but others say individuals should decide what they eat. I will discuss both ideas and give my opinion.
Those who want government control say that fast food ads make people eat unhealthy food. They think if there are fewer ads, especially for kids, people might eat less junk food. For example, some countries don’t allow fast food ads during children’s TV shows. They also think putting health warnings on fast food packages, like on cigarettes, could help people make better choices.
On the other side, people who believe in personal responsibility say we should choose our own food without the government telling us what to do. They think education about healthy eating is better than rules. This view says people need to learn about nutrition and control themselves. They also worry that too many rules might hurt fast food businesses and take away jobs.
I think both sides have good points. While people should be responsible for what they eat, I know ads can be very powerful, especially for children. So, I think some control of fast food marketing is good. We could limit ads during kids’ TV shows and make sure menus show clear information about calories and nutrition. This way, people can make better choices, but still have freedom to choose.
In conclusion, controlling fast food marketing is not a simple issue. I believe a mix of some government rules and personal responsibility is the best way to help people eat healthier while still letting them make their own choices.
(Word count: 276)
Analysis of Band 6-7 Essay
This essay demonstrates good qualities but has some limitations:
-
Task Response: The essay addresses all parts of the task, but the ideas are less fully developed compared to the Band 8-9 essay.
-
Coherence and Cohesion: The essay has a clear structure, but the use of cohesive devices is less sophisticated (e.g., frequent use of “They think” and “This view says”).
-
Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is generally appropriate but less varied and precise compared to the higher band essay (e.g., “control” instead of “regulate”, “ads” instead of “advertisements”).
-
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, but with less variety and sophistication than the Band 8-9 essay.
-
Development of Ideas: Main points are supported, but the examples and explanations are less detailed and nuanced.
Key Vocabulary to Remember
- Ubiquitous (adjective) /juːˈbɪkwɪtəs/ – present, appearing, or found everywhere
- Regulate (verb) /ˈreɡjʊleɪt/ – control or supervise by means of rules and regulations
- Intervention (noun) /ˌɪntəˈvenʃən/ – the action or process of intervening
- Autonomy (noun) /ɔːˈtɒnəmi/ – the right or condition of self-government
- Nutritional literacy (noun phrase) /njuːˈtrɪʃənəl ˈlɪtərəsi/ – the ability to understand and use nutrition information
- Infringe (verb) /ɪnˈfrɪndʒ/ – actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.)
- Nuanced (adjective) /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ – characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression
- Aggressive marketing (noun phrase) /əˈɡresɪv ˈmɑːkɪtɪŋ/ – forceful and competitive promotion of products or services
Conclusion
Mastering essays on Regulating Fast Food Marketing To Protect Health requires a deep understanding of the issue, strong analytical skills, and the ability to articulate complex ideas clearly. By studying these sample essays and understanding the criteria for different band scores, you can improve your own writing skills for IELTS Task 2.
For further practice, consider writing essays on related topics such as:
- The impact of fast food consumption on public health
- The role of education in promoting healthy eating habits
- The effectiveness of taxation on unhealthy foods
Remember to focus on developing well-structured arguments, using a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, and providing relevant examples to support your points. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion. Good luck with your IELTS preparation!
