As an IELTS Writing instructor, I’ve noticed that questions about the Role Of Government Subsidies In Job Creation have become increasingly common in recent years. This topic combines elements of economics, public policy, and social welfare, making it a rich area for discussion in IELTS Writing Task 2. Let’s dive into a sample question and explore how to craft band 7 and band 8 responses on this subject.
Analyzing the Question
Some people believe that governments should provide financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This question, while not directly mentioning job creation, touches on the broader theme of government subsidies and their impact on specific sectors of the economy. It’s a classic example of how the topic of government financial support can be presented in an IELTS Writing Task 2 question.
Sample Essay (Band 8)
In the realm of arts funding, there is a ongoing debate about whether governments should provide financial support to creative artists or if alternative sources should be responsible for this funding. This essay will examine both perspectives and argue that a balanced approach involving both government and private funding is most beneficial.
Those who advocate for government funding of the arts argue that it is essential for cultural preservation and development. They contend that many forms of art, particularly those that are not commercially viable, would disappear without state support. Moreover, government subsidies can help nurture new talent and innovative art forms that might not survive in a purely market-driven environment. For instance, experimental theatre or avant-garde music often struggle to find commercial backing but can contribute significantly to a nation’s cultural landscape.
On the other hand, proponents of alternative funding sources argue that art should be self-sustaining or supported by private patrons. They believe that government funding can lead to art that caters to political agendas rather than artistic merit. Furthermore, they contend that private funding encourages artists to be more responsive to public tastes and more efficient in their creative processes. The success of crowdfunding platforms for artistic projects is often cited as evidence that alternative funding models can work effectively.
In my opinion, a combination of both government and alternative funding sources is ideal. Government subsidies can provide a safety net for less commercial art forms and ensure a diverse cultural offering. Simultaneously, private funding can encourage innovation and public engagement. This balanced approach can create a vibrant artistic ecosystem where both traditional and contemporary art forms can thrive.
In conclusion, while both government support and alternative funding have their merits, a mixed model offers the best solution. It can ensure the preservation of cultural heritage, the development of new artistic expressions, and maintain a connection between artists and their audiences. This approach recognizes the value of art both as a public good and as a responsive, evolving form of expression.
(Word count: 309)
Government subsidies for artists
Sample Essay (Band 6-7)
The question of who should fund creative artists is a topic of much debate. Some people think the government should provide financial support, while others believe alternative sources should fund artists. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Those who support government funding for artists argue that it is important for culture. They say that without government money, many types of art might disappear because they don’t make money. Also, government support can help new artists start their careers. For example, a young painter might need money to buy materials and have an exhibition, which the government could provide.
On the other hand, people who prefer alternative funding sources say that art should support itself or be funded by private people or companies. They think that government funding might make artists create art that the government likes, instead of what they really want to make. They also believe that private funding makes artists more creative and efficient. For instance, if an artist needs to find their own funding, they might work harder to make art that people want to buy.
In my opinion, I think both government and alternative funding are important. Government money can help protect traditional art forms and support new artists who are just starting. But private funding is also good because it can encourage artists to be innovative and connect with the public. Having both types of funding can create a good balance in the art world.
To conclude, I believe a mix of government support and alternative funding is the best way to support creative artists. This approach can help keep traditional art alive, support new artists, and make sure that art stays connected to what people want to see and experience.
(Word count: 280)
Key Points to Remember When Writing
-
Structure: Both essays follow a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs discussing each view, the writer’s opinion, and a conclusion. This is crucial for achieving a higher band score.
-
Language: The band 8 essay uses more sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structures, while the band 6-7 essay uses simpler language. For example, “nurture new talent” vs. “help new artists start their careers”.
-
Coherence and Cohesion: Both essays use linking words and phrases, but the band 8 essay does this more effectively, creating a smoother flow of ideas.
-
Task Response: Both essays address all parts of the question, but the band 8 essay provides more detailed examples and a more nuanced argument.
-
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The band 8 essay demonstrates a wider range of grammatical structures with fewer errors compared to the band 6-7 essay.
Vocabulary to Remember
- Subsidy (noun) /ˈsʌbsədi/ – financial support provided by a government to an industry or business
- Nurture (verb) /ˈnɜːrtʃər/ – to help or encourage the development of something
- Avant-garde (adjective) /ˌævɒ̃ˈɡɑːd/ – new and experimental ideas in art, music, or literature
- Patron (noun) /ˈpeɪtrən/ – a person who gives financial or other support to a person, organization, or cause
- Ecosystem (noun) /ˈiːkəʊsɪstəm/ – a complex network or interconnected system
- Vibrant (adjective) /ˈvaɪbrənt/ – full of energy and life
- Innovative (adjective) /ˈɪnəveɪtɪv/ – featuring new methods; advanced and original
- Merit (noun) /ˈmerɪt/ – the quality of being particularly good or worthy
Conclusion
The role of government subsidies in job creation, particularly in the creative sector, is a complex and nuanced topic that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2. By understanding the key arguments and using appropriate vocabulary and structures, you can craft a well-reasoned and articulate response to such questions.
For further practice, consider writing essays on related topics such as government subsidies for renewable energy industries or the impact of subsidies on small businesses. Remember to focus on clear structure, relevant examples, and a balanced argument. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion!
If you found this guide helpful, you might also be interested in our articles on the role of governments in promoting renewable energy sources and the economic impacts of renewable energy subsidies, which explore similar themes of government intervention in the economy.
