The debate between prioritizing sports versus science in schools is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2. This topic has appeared multiple times in various forms since 2019, particularly in countries like India, China, and South Korea where academic pressure is high. Based on analysis of past exam patterns, this topic is likely to continue appearing in future tests.
Analysis of Topic and Question Type
Some people think schools should focus more on teaching sports rather than spending so much time on science subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
This is an agree/disagree essay that requires candidates to:
- Take a clear position on the issue
- Provide balanced arguments
- Support ideas with relevant examples
- Reach a logical conclusion
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8.5)
In recent years, there has been growing debate about whether schools should prioritize physical education over scientific subjects. While I acknowledge the importance of sports in student development, I strongly disagree with reducing focus on science education.
Firstly, scientific education forms the foundation for technological advancement and innovation. In our rapidly evolving world, strong scientific knowledge is crucial for students to understand and contribute to fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, and renewable energy. For instance, countries with robust science education systems like Japan and South Korea have consistently produced technological innovations that drive global progress.
Moreover, scientific subjects develop critical thinking and analytical skills that are valuable across all career paths. Students who excel in sciences typically demonstrate superior problem-solving abilities and logical reasoning, which are essential in today’s knowledge-based economy. These skills prove beneficial regardless of whether students pursue careers in STEM fields or other sectors.
While sports undoubtedly play a vital role in physical fitness and character building, they should complement rather than replace science education. Schools can achieve a balanced approach by maintaining strong science programs while incorporating regular physical activities through well-structured sports programs. This ensures students receive both intellectual stimulation and physical development.
In conclusion, while physical education is important, reducing scientific education would be detrimental to students’ future prospects and society’s technological progress. The optimal approach is to maintain strong emphasis on science while ensuring adequate time for sports activities.
Students Conducting Scientific Experiments in Modern Laboratory
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6.5)
Nowadays, many people think schools should teach more sports instead of science subjects. I disagree with this idea because science is very important for students’ future.
First, science subjects help students get good jobs. Many companies need workers who understand technology and science. For example, in my country, students who study science subjects like mathematics and physics can find jobs in big companies more easily than others.
Second, science helps students think better. When students learn science, they learn how to solve problems and think logically. These skills are useful in daily life, not just in science jobs. They can use these skills in many situations.
Sports are also important because they make students healthy and teach teamwork. However, schools should not reduce science classes for sports. They can have both science and sports at different times. This way, students can learn both things.
In conclusion, I think schools should keep teaching science subjects. Sports are important too, but they should not replace science education. Schools should find ways to teach both subjects properly.
Band Score Analysis
Band 8.5 Essay Analysis:
- Clear position throughout
- Sophisticated vocabulary and complex structures
- Well-developed arguments with specific examples
- Cohesive devices used effectively
- Excellent paragraph organization
Band 6.5 Essay Analysis:
- Basic but clear position
- Simple vocabulary and grammar structures
- Limited range of linking words
- Ideas present but less developed
- Some repetition in expression
Key Vocabulary
- technological advancement (n) /ˌtek.nəˈlɒdʒ.ɪ.kəl/ – sự tiến bộ công nghệ
- critical thinking (n) /ˈkrɪt.ɪ.kəl/ – tư duy phản biện
- analytical skills (n) /ˌæn.əˈlɪt.ɪ.kəl/ – kỹ năng phân tích
- knowledge-based economy (n) /ˈnɒl.ɪdʒ.beɪst/ – nền kinh tế tri thức
- complementary (adj) /ˌkɒm.plɪˈmen.tər.i/ – bổ sung
- detrimental (adj) /ˌdet.rɪˈmen.təl/ – có hại
- technological innovation (n) /ˌtek.nəˈlɒdʒ.ɪ.kəl ˌɪn.əˈveɪ.ʃən/ – đổi mới công nghệ
Consider practicing with these similar topics:
- The role of arts vs. technology in education
- Balancing academic subjects with life skills
- Traditional subjects vs. modern skills in schools
Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion.
