The topic of celebrity privacy and media coverage has been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations, appearing approximately 2-3 times annually. Based on analysis of past papers, this topic frequently emerges in various forms, particularly focusing on the relationship between public figures and media attention.
Analysis of Recent IELTS Task 2 Question
Some people think that celebrities should accept that media interest in their private lives is the price they pay for being famous. Others say that everybody, including celebrities, has a right to privacy. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Question Analysis
- Topic: Celebrity privacy vs media publicity
- Task: Discussion + opinion
- Key points to address:
- Arguments for media coverage of celebrities’ private lives
- Arguments for protecting celebrities’ privacy
- Personal stance on the issue
Band 8.5 Model Answer
In today’s celebrity-driven culture, the extent to which famous individuals should accept media intrusion into their personal lives remains a contentious issue. While some argue that this scrutiny comes with fame, others maintain that privacy is a fundamental right for all individuals, regardless of their public status.
Those who support media coverage of celebrities’ private lives often contend that public figures knowingly enter into an implicit contract with the media when pursuing fame. Celebrities benefit substantially from public attention through lucrative endorsement deals and career opportunities. Moreover, their influence on public opinion and behavior makes their personal conduct a matter of public interest. For instance, when celebrities promote certain lifestyles or values, the public has a legitimate interest in knowing whether these figures actually embody these principles in their private lives.
However, the argument for privacy protection is equally compelling. Every individual, regardless of their profession or status, should be entitled to basic human rights, including privacy. The constant media surveillance can have severe psychological impacts on celebrities and their families, particularly their children who never chose public life. Furthermore, invasive media coverage often leads to the spread of misinformation and can damage reputations irreparably. The tragic case of Princess Diana serves as a stark reminder of how excessive media intrusion can have devastating consequences.
In my opinion, while public figures should expect some degree of media attention, there should be clear boundaries protecting their fundamental right to privacy. A balanced approach would involve media coverage of events and activities that directly relate to their public roles, while respecting their private moments, especially those involving family and personal relationships. This would maintain public accountability while preserving basic human dignity.
Impact of media intrusion on celebrity private life
Band 6.5 Model Answer
Nowadays, many people debate whether famous people should accept media attention in their private lives. Some think it’s part of being famous, but others believe everyone needs privacy. I will discuss both views and share my opinion.
Some people say celebrities should accept media coverage of their private lives. They think famous people get many benefits from being in the public eye, like money from advertising and movie contracts. Also, fans want to know about their favorite stars’ lives because they look up to them. For example, when a celebrity promotes healthy living, people want to see if they really live that way.
On the other hand, many people believe celebrities deserve privacy. They say it’s not fair for media to follow famous people everywhere and take pictures of them with their families. This can make celebrities feel stressed and unhappy. Sometimes, their children also suffer because they cannot have a normal life. Additionally, newspapers might print wrong information about celebrities, which can hurt their reputation.
I believe celebrities should have some privacy, especially in their personal lives. While it’s okay for media to report about their work and public appearances, they should not disturb them during private moments. This would be better for both celebrities and their families.
Scoring Analysis
Band 8.5 Essay:
- Task Response: Fully addresses all parts with well-developed arguments
- Coherence and Cohesion: Logical organization with clear progression
- Lexical Resource: Sophisticated vocabulary with natural and precise usage
- Grammatical Range: Complex structures used accurately
Band 6.5 Essay:
- Task Response: Addresses main points but less detailed
- Coherence and Cohesion: Basic organization with some progression
- Lexical Resource: Adequate vocabulary but less sophisticated
- Grammatical Range: Mix of simple and complex structures
Key Vocabulary
- intrusion (n) /ɪnˈtruːʒən/ – unwanted interference
- contentious (adj) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing disagreement
- scrutiny (n) /ˈskruːtɪni/ – careful examination
- lucrative (adj) /ˈluːkrətɪv/ – producing lots of money
- devastating (adj) /ˈdevəsteɪtɪŋ/ – highly destructive
- irreparably (adv) /ɪˈrepərəbli/ – impossibly to repair
- surveillance (n) /səˈveɪləns/ – close observation
- accountability (n) /əˌkaʊntəˈbɪləti/ – responsibility to accept blame
Consider practicing with these similar topics:
- Should social media influencers be held accountable for their impact on young followers?
- Do public figures have a responsibility to be role models?
- How does media coverage affect modern society?
Share your practice essays in the comments for feedback and discussion.
