The topic of implementing car-free zones in cities is becoming increasingly relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays. Based on recent trends and past exam questions, this subject is likely to appear more frequently in future tests. It touches on environmental concerns, urban planning, and quality of life issues, making it a prime candidate for IELTS essay topics. Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:
Some people believe that cities should create more car-free zones in city centers, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analyzing the Question
This question requires candidates to:
- Discuss arguments for creating more car-free zones in city centers
- Discuss arguments against creating more car-free zones in city centers
- Provide their own opinion on the issue
It’s crucial to address all parts of the question and maintain a balanced approach while clearly stating your personal stance.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
Car-free zones in city centers have become a topic of heated debate in recent years. While some advocate for their implementation to improve urban environments, others argue that such measures could have detrimental effects. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.
Proponents of car-free zones argue that these areas can significantly enhance the quality of life in cities. By reducing vehicle traffic, air pollution levels decrease, leading to improved public health outcomes. Moreover, pedestrianized zones often foster a sense of community, encouraging social interactions and supporting local businesses. Cities like Copenhagen and Amsterdam have successfully demonstrated how car-free areas can transform urban spaces into vibrant, people-friendly environments.
On the other hand, critics contend that car-free zones may have negative economic implications. They argue that restricting vehicle access could deter customers from visiting city center businesses, potentially leading to a decline in retail activity. Additionally, there are concerns about accessibility for elderly or disabled individuals who rely on personal vehicles for transportation. Some also point out that car-free zones might simply displace traffic to surrounding areas, exacerbating congestion in those neighborhoods.
In my opinion, the benefits of implementing car-free zones in city centers outweigh the potential drawbacks. While initial resistance and adaptation challenges are to be expected, the long-term advantages for public health, environmental sustainability, and community well-being are substantial. However, I believe that the implementation of such zones should be gradual and accompanied by comprehensive public transportation improvements and provisions for those with mobility limitations.
In conclusion, car-free zones represent a progressive approach to urban planning that can significantly enhance the livability of city centers. By carefully addressing concerns and ensuring inclusive accessibility, cities can create more sustainable and people-centric environments that benefit all residents.
(Word count: 297)
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
The idea of making more car-free zones in city centers is a hot topic these days. Some people think it’s a great idea, while others aren’t so sure. In this essay, I’ll talk about both sides and give my own thoughts.
Those who support car-free zones say they make cities nicer places to live. When there are fewer cars, the air is cleaner, which is good for everyone’s health. Also, these areas can be really nice for walking and meeting people. Some cities that have done this, like parts of London, have seen more people shopping and eating out in these areas.
However, not everyone agrees with this idea. Some worry that if people can’t drive to city centers, businesses might lose customers. This could be bad for shops and restaurants. There’s also the question of how older people or those who can’t walk easily will get around. Some think it might just move traffic problems to other parts of the city.
In my opinion, I think car-free zones are a good idea overall. They can make city centers more pleasant and healthier. But I also think it’s important to do it carefully. Cities should make sure there are good buses or trains to help people get around. They should also think about ways to help businesses during the change.
To sum up, while there are some challenges, I believe car-free zones can really improve our cities. If done right, they can make city centers better places for everyone to enjoy.
(Word count: 261)
Sample Essay 3 (Band 5-6)
Some people think cities should have more areas without cars in the center, but others don’t agree. I will discuss both sides in this essay.
People who like the idea of car-free zones say it’s good for the environment. When there are no cars, there is less pollution. This makes the air cleaner for people to breathe. Also, these areas can be nice for walking and shopping. Some cities that have done this say more people come to the city center to spend time.
But some people don’t like this idea. They worry that if people can’t drive to shops, the shops might lose money. Also, some people need cars to get around, like old people or people who can’t walk well. Another problem is that the traffic might just move to other parts of the city.
I think car-free zones are a good idea. They can make cities nicer and healthier. But I also think cities need to be careful when they do this. They should make sure there are good buses or trains. They should also help businesses that might have problems at first.
In conclusion, I believe car-free zones can be good for cities. They can make city centers better for people. But it’s important to do it in a way that helps everyone.
(Word count: 218)
Explanation of Band Scores
Band 8-9 Essay:
- Fully addresses all parts of the task with a well-developed response
- Presents a clear position throughout the response
- Uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features
- Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy
- Demonstrates high levels of coherence and cohesion throughout
Band 6-7 Essay:
- Addresses all parts of the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others
- Presents a relevant position, though conclusions may become unclear or repetitive
- Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, with some inaccuracies
- Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms
- Arranges information coherently and there is clear overall progression
Band 5-6 Essay:
- Addresses the task only partially; the format may be inappropriate in places
- Expresses a position but the development is not always clear
- Uses a limited range of vocabulary, but this is minimally adequate for the task
- May make noticeable errors in spelling and/or word formation that may cause some difficulty for the reader
- Uses only a limited range of structures
- Presents information with some organization but there may be a lack of overall progression
Key Vocabulary to Remember
-
Car-free zones (noun): Areas where vehicles are prohibited
Pronunciation: /kɑːr friː zəʊnz/ -
Urban planning (noun): The process of designing and organizing urban areas
Pronunciation: /ˈɜːrbən ˈplænɪŋ/ -
Pedestrianize (verb): To convert an area to be free of vehicular traffic
Pronunciation: /pəˈdestriənaɪz/ -
Accessibility (noun): The quality of being easily reached or entered
Pronunciation: /əkˌsesəˈbɪləti/ -
Congestion (noun): The state of being overcrowded, especially with traffic
Pronunciation: /kənˈdʒestʃən/ -
Sustainable (adjective): Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level
Pronunciation: /səˈsteɪnəbl/ -
Livability (noun): The quality of being suitable for living in
Pronunciation: /ˌlɪvəˈbɪləti/ -
Infrastructure (noun): The basic physical and organizational structures needed for the operation of a society
Pronunciation: /ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/ -
Public transportation (noun): Forms of transport available to the public, typically run on fixed routes
Pronunciation: /ˈpʌblɪk ˌtrænspɔːˈteɪʃn/ -
Environmental sustainability (noun): The responsible interaction with the environment to avoid depletion or degradation of natural resources
Pronunciation: /ɪnˌvaɪrənˈmentl səˌsteɪnəˈbɪləti/
In conclusion, the topic of car-free zones in cities is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays. It touches on important issues of urban planning, environmental sustainability, and quality of life in cities. To prepare for potential questions on this topic, consider practicing with variations such as:
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of implementing car-free days in major cities.
- Some people believe that all city centers should be completely car-free. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
- Compare the effectiveness of car-free zones with other measures to reduce urban pollution.
Remember to structure your essay clearly, use a range of vocabulary and sentence structures, and always support your arguments with relevant examples. Practice writing your own essay on this topic and consider sharing it in the comments section for feedback and discussion with other learners.