The topic of whether governments should impose higher taxes on luxury goods to reduce inequality is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2. Based on past exam trends and analysis of IELTS preparation websites, this topic has appeared frequently and is likely to continue being a popular choice for examiners. Let’s explore this subject in depth with sample essays and analysis to help you prepare effectively for your IELTS exam.
Analyzing the Task
Let’s focus on a specific question that aligns closely with real IELTS exam questions:
Some people believe that governments should impose higher taxes on luxury goods to reduce inequality. Others argue that this approach is ineffective. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This question requires you to:
- Discuss the view that higher taxes on luxury goods can reduce inequality
- Discuss the opposing view that this approach is ineffective
- Provide your own opinion on the matter
Remember to address all parts of the question and provide a balanced argument before stating your position.
Sample Essays for Different Band Scores
Band 8-9 Sample Essay
The debate over whether governments should levy higher taxes on luxury items to address income disparity is a contentious one. While some argue that this policy could effectively reduce inequality, others contend that it is an ineffective approach. This essay will examine both perspectives before offering a personal viewpoint.
Proponents of increased taxation on luxury goods argue that it can be an effective tool for reducing societal inequality. They contend that by making high-end products more expensive, the wealthy will contribute more to public coffers, which can then be redistributed to support social programs benefiting lower-income groups. This approach, they claim, not only generates additional revenue but also discourages excessive consumption among the affluent, potentially leading to a more equitable distribution of wealth.
Conversely, critics of this policy argue that it is an ineffective means of addressing inequality. They point out that the wealthy often have the means to purchase luxury goods abroad or find loopholes to avoid higher taxes, rendering the policy ineffective. Furthermore, they argue that such taxes can harm local businesses and industries that produce or sell luxury items, potentially leading to job losses and economic downturns that disproportionately affect lower-income workers.
In my opinion, while taxing luxury goods may have some merit, it is not a comprehensive solution to the complex issue of inequality. A more effective approach would involve a combination of progressive income taxation, investment in education and skills training, and policies that promote equal opportunities in the job market. These measures are more likely to address the root causes of inequality rather than simply targeting the symptoms.
In conclusion, while higher taxes on luxury goods may seem like an attractive option for reducing inequality, its effectiveness is debatable. A multifaceted approach that addresses systemic issues is more likely to yield long-term results in creating a more equitable society.
(Word count: 298)
Band 6-7 Sample Essay
The question of whether governments should put higher taxes on luxury goods to reduce inequality is a topic of much debate. Some people think this is a good idea, while others believe it won’t work. This essay will look at both sides of the argument and give my opinion.
Those who support higher taxes on luxury items say it can help reduce the gap between rich and poor. They argue that by making expensive things cost more, rich people will pay more taxes, which can be used to help poorer people. This could include funding better schools, healthcare, and other services that benefit everyone, especially those with lower incomes.
On the other hand, people against this idea say it won’t really solve the problem of inequality. They point out that rich people can still buy luxury goods from other countries where taxes are lower. Also, they worry that higher taxes might hurt businesses that sell luxury items, which could lead to job losses for ordinary workers.
In my opinion, while taxing luxury goods more might seem like a good idea, it’s not enough to solve the big problem of inequality. I think governments should focus on other ways to help, like improving education for everyone and creating more job opportunities. These solutions might take longer, but they could have a bigger impact on reducing inequality in the long run.
To conclude, the idea of taxing luxury goods more to reduce inequality has both good and bad points. While it might help a little, I believe that other approaches that focus on giving everyone a fair chance to succeed are more important for creating a more equal society.
(Word count: 272)
Band 5-6 Sample Essay
Some people think governments should make luxury goods more expensive with higher taxes to reduce inequality. Others say this won’t work. I will discuss both ideas and give my opinion.
People who like higher taxes on luxury goods say it’s good because rich people will pay more money. This extra money can be used to help poor people with things like better schools and hospitals. They think this will make society more fair.
But other people don’t agree. They say rich people can still buy expensive things from other countries where taxes are lower. They also worry that shops selling luxury items might lose business and have to fire workers.
I think both sides have good points, but I don’t think higher taxes on luxury goods is the best way to solve inequality. It’s better for governments to focus on giving everyone good education and more chances to get good jobs. This will help more people in the long run.
In conclusion, while making luxury goods more expensive might seem like a good idea, I believe there are better ways to make society more equal. Helping everyone get a good education and find good jobs is more important.
(Word count: 185)
Analysis of Essay Structures and Scores
Band 8-9 Essay Analysis
This essay demonstrates excellent command of the English language and addresses all parts of the task effectively:
- Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and providing a clear personal opinion.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively.
- Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately. Sophisticated words like “contention,” “proponents,” and “multifaceted” enhance the essay’s quality.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Complex sentence structures are used confidently and accurately. There’s a mix of simple and complex sentences, showing good control over grammar.
Band 6-7 Essay Analysis
This essay shows a good attempt at addressing the task, with some areas for improvement:
- Task Achievement: The essay covers both views and provides a personal opinion, but the arguments could be more developed.
- Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is generally well-organized, but transitions between ideas could be smoother.
- Lexical Resource: There’s a good range of vocabulary, but it’s less sophisticated compared to the Band 8-9 essay.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Sentences are generally well-formed, but there’s less variety in structure compared to the higher band essay.
Band 5-6 Essay Analysis
This essay demonstrates a basic understanding of the task but lacks depth:
- Task Achievement: The essay addresses the main points but lacks detail and depth in its arguments.
- Coherence and Cohesion: The structure is basic but clear. Paragraphing is present but could be more effectively used.
- Lexical Resource: Vocabulary is limited but generally appropriate. There’s little attempt at using less common vocabulary.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Sentences are mostly simple in structure. There are some errors, but they don’t impede communication.
Key Vocabulary to Remember
- Inequality (noun) /ɪnɪˈkwɒlɪti/ – unfair difference between groups of people in society
- Luxury goods (noun phrase) /ˈlʌkʃəri gʊdz/ – expensive items that are not necessary but are bought to make life more pleasant
- Taxation (noun) /tækˈseɪʃən/ – the system of collecting money from citizens by the government
- Redistribution (noun) /ˌriːdɪstrɪˈbjuːʃən/ – the act of sharing money or goods so that there is a fairer division
- Affluent (adjective) /ˈæfluənt/ – having a lot of money or owning a lot of things
- Loophole (noun) /ˈluːphoʊl/ – a small mistake in a law that makes it possible to do something the law is supposed to prevent
- Progressive taxation (noun phrase) /prəˈɡresɪv tækˈseɪʃən/ – a tax system where the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases
- Multifaceted (adjective) /ˌmʌltiˈfæsɪtɪd/ – having many different aspects or features
- Systemic (adjective) /sɪˈstemɪk/ – affecting or relating to a whole system, not just some parts of it
- Equitable (adjective) /ˈekwɪtəbəl/ – fair and impartial
Conclusion
The topic of taxing luxury goods to reduce inequality is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on related themes such as:
- The effectiveness of progressive taxation systems
- Government measures to reduce income inequality
- The impact of consumerism on society
- The role of fiscal policy in addressing social issues
Remember, the key to success in IELTS Writing Task 2 is not just about memorizing sample essays, but understanding how to construct a well-reasoned argument and express it clearly. Practice writing your own essays on this topic and feel free to share them in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will significantly enhance your writing skills and prepare you for success in your IELTS exam.