Mastering IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Stricter Carbon Emission Laws (Band 6-9)

Carbon emission regulations have become an increasingly prevalent topic in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on recent trends, it is highly likely that questions related to government policies on carbon emissions will continue to …

Government and industry collaboration on carbon emission regulations

Carbon emission regulations have become an increasingly prevalent topic in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on recent trends, it is highly likely that questions related to government policies on carbon emissions will continue to appear frequently in future tests. Let’s explore a relevant essay question that has appeared in past IELTS exams:

Some people think that governments should impose stricter carbon emission laws on industries. Others believe that companies should be allowed to regulate their own carbon emissions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analysis of the Question

This question presents a balanced argument task, asking candidates to discuss two contrasting viewpoints on carbon emission regulations. The key points to address are:

  1. Government-imposed stricter carbon emission laws
  2. Self-regulation of carbon emissions by companies
  3. Your personal opinion on the issue

It’s crucial to discuss both perspectives equally before presenting your own stance on the matter.

Band 8-9 Sample Essay

Here’s a high-scoring sample essay that effectively addresses all aspects of the question:

Climate change is undeniably one of the most pressing issues of our time, and the debate over how to regulate carbon emissions has become increasingly crucial. While some advocate for stricter government-imposed laws, others argue that companies should self-regulate their carbon output. This essay will examine both viewpoints before presenting my own perspective on this complex issue.

Those in favor of government intervention argue that stringent regulations are necessary to combat climate change effectively. They contend that left to their own devices, many companies prioritize profit over environmental concerns, leading to continued high levels of carbon emissions. Government-mandated limits and penalties can force industries to invest in cleaner technologies and adopt more sustainable practices. For instance, the European Union’s Emissions Trading System has successfully reduced greenhouse gas emissions in participating countries by creating a financial incentive for companies to lower their carbon output.

On the other hand, proponents of self-regulation argue that companies are best positioned to determine the most efficient ways to reduce their carbon footprint. They claim that excessive government intervention can stifle innovation and economic growth. By allowing businesses to set their own targets and strategies, they can develop creative solutions tailored to their specific industries. For example, many tech giants like Google and Microsoft have voluntarily committed to becoming carbon neutral or even carbon negative, demonstrating that corporate responsibility can drive significant environmental progress.

In my opinion, while corporate initiatives are commendable, government oversight is crucial to ensure consistent and meaningful reductions in carbon emissions across all sectors. A balanced approach combining clear governmental guidelines with flexibility for corporate innovation would be most effective. Governments should set ambitious targets and provide incentives for companies to meet them, while also allowing businesses some autonomy in how they achieve these goals. This approach would leverage the strengths of both government regulation and corporate ingenuity to address the urgent challenge of climate change.

In conclusion, the issue of carbon emission regulation requires a nuanced approach that recognizes the strengths and limitations of both government intervention and corporate self-regulation. By fostering a collaborative environment between public and private sectors, we can work towards a more sustainable future for our planet.

Government and industry collaboration on carbon emission regulationsGovernment and industry collaboration on carbon emission regulations

Explanation of Band 8-9 Score

This essay demonstrates several qualities that contribute to its high band score:

  1. Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both viewpoints and clearly stating the writer’s opinion.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-organized with clear paragraphing and effective use of linking words and phrases.

  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately, including topic-specific terms like “carbon footprint” and “greenhouse gas emissions”.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay displays a variety of complex sentence structures with minimal errors.

  5. Development of Ideas: Each point is fully elaborated with relevant examples and explanations.

Band 6-7 Sample Essay

Here’s a sample essay that would typically score in the Band 6-7 range:

In recent years, the topic of carbon emissions has become very important. Some people think the government should make stricter laws for industries, while others believe companies should control their own emissions. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

On one hand, government regulations can be effective in reducing carbon emissions. When the government sets strict rules, companies have to follow them or face penalties. This can lead to significant reductions in pollution. For example, in some countries, car manufacturers have to meet certain emission standards, which has helped to make cars cleaner.

On the other hand, letting companies regulate themselves can also work. Many businesses are now aware of environmental issues and want to be seen as responsible. They might invest in green technologies or find ways to use less energy. Some big companies have even promised to become carbon neutral in the future.

In my opinion, a mix of both approaches is best. Governments should set some basic rules to ensure all companies are doing their part. However, they should also encourage innovation by allowing companies some freedom in how they reduce emissions. This way, we can benefit from both government oversight and company creativity.

To conclude, while both government regulations and company self-regulation have their merits, a combined approach is likely to be most effective in tackling the serious issue of carbon emissions.

Comparison of carbon emission reduction strategiesComparison of carbon emission reduction strategies

Explanation of Band 6-7 Score

This essay demonstrates characteristics typical of a Band 6-7 score:

  1. Task Response: The essay addresses all parts of the task, but the treatment of the topic is less comprehensive than the Band 8-9 essay.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is generally well-organized, but the use of cohesive devices is less sophisticated.

  3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is adequate for the task, but lacks the precision and range of the higher band essay.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, with some errors that do not impede communication.

  5. Development of Ideas: Ideas are developed logically, but with less depth and fewer specific examples compared to the Band 8-9 essay.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

Here are some key vocabulary items from the essays, along with their definitions and parts of speech:

  1. Carbon emissions (noun) /ˈkɑːrbən ɪˈmɪʃənz/: The release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, typically as a result of burning fossil fuels.

  2. Stringent (adjective) /ˈstrɪndʒənt/: Strict, precise, and exacting.

  3. Incentive (noun) /ɪnˈsentɪv/: Something that motivates or encourages someone to do something.

  4. Stifle (verb) /ˈstaɪfəl/: To prevent or constrain; to stop something from happening or developing.

  5. Carbon footprint (noun) /ˈkɑːrbən ˈfʊtprɪnt/: The amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere as a result of the activities of a particular individual, organization, or community.

  6. Sustainable (adjective) /səˈsteɪnəbəl/: Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level; conserving an ecological balance by avoiding depletion of natural resources.

  7. Nuanced (adjective) /ˈnuːɑːnst/: Characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression.

  8. Innovation (noun) /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃən/: The action or process of innovating; a new method, idea, product, etc.

These vocabulary items can help elevate your essay and demonstrate a strong command of English in your IELTS Writing Task 2 response.

Conclusion

The topic of government regulations on carbon emissions is likely to remain relevant in future IELTS exams. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on similar environmental topics such as:

  • The role of individuals vs. governments in combating climate change
  • The economic impact of strict environmental regulations
  • The effectiveness of international agreements on reducing global carbon emissions

Remember to analyze the question carefully, plan your response, and use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures in your essay. Consider sharing your practice essays in the comments section below for feedback and discussion with fellow IELTS candidates. This active engagement can significantly improve your writing skills and prepare you for success in the IELTS Writing Task 2.