Site icon IELTS.NET

Sample IELTS Writing Task 2 Essays: Should Governments Promote Work-Life Balance Through Legislation?

Government and business collaboration for work-life balance

Government and business collaboration for work-life balance

Work-life balance has become an increasingly important topic in recent years, especially as digital transformation changes workplace dynamics. This issue frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions, often framed around government policies and legislation. Based on trends in past exams and current societal discussions, it’s highly likely that questions related to work-life balance will continue to be a prominent theme in future IELTS tests.

Let’s examine a typical IELTS Writing Task 2 question on this topic:

Some people believe that governments should pass laws to ensure a better work-life balance for employees. Others think this should be a matter for employers to decide. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analyzing the Question

This question asks you to discuss two contrasting views:

  1. Governments should legislate work-life balance
  2. Employers should decide on work-life balance policies

You’re also required to provide your own opinion on the matter. This type of question falls under the “discuss both views and give your opinion” category, which is common in IELTS Writing Task 2.

Sample Essays

Band 8-9 Essay

In today’s fast-paced world, achieving a healthy work-life balance has become increasingly challenging for many employees. While some argue that governments should intervene through legislation to promote better work-life balance, others believe this decision should be left to employers. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own view on the matter.

Those in favor of government intervention argue that legislation is necessary to protect workers’ rights and well-being. They contend that without legal mandates, many companies may prioritize profits over employee welfare, leading to overwork, stress, and burnout. For instance, countries like France have implemented laws limiting the workweek to 35 hours, which has reportedly improved workers’ quality of life. Furthermore, government regulations can create a level playing field for all businesses, preventing companies from gaining a competitive advantage by exploiting their workforce.

On the other hand, proponents of employer discretion argue that companies are better positioned to understand and address their employees’ needs. They maintain that a one-size-fits-all approach through legislation may not account for the diverse nature of industries and individual preferences. For example, a tech startup might offer flexible working hours and remote work options, while a manufacturing plant might focus on shift rotations and on-site wellness programs. Allowing employers to tailor their work-life balance policies can lead to more innovative and effective solutions.

In my opinion, a balanced approach combining government guidelines with employer flexibility would be most effective. Governments should establish minimum standards for work hours, paid leave, and other essential aspects of work-life balance. However, they should also provide incentives for companies that go beyond these minimums and implement innovative work-life balance programs. This approach would ensure basic protections for all workers while encouraging employers to develop policies that best suit their specific circumstances and workforce.

In conclusion, while both government legislation and employer discretion have their merits in promoting work-life balance, a collaborative approach is likely to yield the best results. By setting baseline standards and incentivizing progressive policies, governments can work in tandem with employers to create a healthier, more productive workforce. (309 words)

Government and business collaboration for work-life balance

Band 6-7 Essay

The issue of work-life balance has become increasingly important in recent years. While some people think that governments should make laws to ensure better work-life balance for employees, others believe this should be decided by employers. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who support government intervention argue that laws are necessary to protect workers. They say that without these laws, many companies might make their employees work too much, causing stress and health problems. For example, some countries have laws that limit how many hours people can work per week. This can help prevent burnout and give people more time for their personal lives.

On the other hand, those who think employers should decide argue that companies know what’s best for their business and employees. They believe that different industries have different needs, so a single law might not work well for everyone. For instance, a small startup might need more flexible hours than a large factory. If employers can choose their own policies, they might come up with better solutions for their specific situation.

In my opinion, I think a combination of both approaches would work best. Governments should set some basic rules to protect workers, like minimum vacation days and maximum working hours. However, they should also allow companies some flexibility to create their own policies that suit their business and employees. This way, workers have some guaranteed rights, but companies can also be creative in how they support work-life balance.

To conclude, while both government laws and employer decisions have their advantages in promoting work-life balance, I believe a mixed approach would be most effective. By setting some basic standards and allowing flexibility, we can ensure that all workers have some protection while also encouraging companies to find the best solutions for their specific needs. (280 words)

Explanation of Band Scores

The Band 8-9 essay demonstrates:

The Band 6-7 essay shows:

The main differences lie in the depth of analysis, sophistication of language, and overall coherence of the argument. The higher band essay provides more detailed examples and a more nuanced conclusion.

Key Vocabulary

  1. work-life balance (noun) /wɜːk-laɪf ˈbæləns/: The division of one’s time and focus between working and family or leisure activities.

  2. legislation (noun) /ˌledʒɪsˈleɪʃən/: Laws, considered collectively.

  3. intervene (verb) /ˌɪntəˈviːn/: To become involved in a situation in order to influence or alter it.

  4. discretion (noun) /dɪˈskreʃən/: The freedom to decide what should be done in a particular situation.

  5. mandate (noun) /ˈmændeɪt/: An official order or commission to do something.

  6. burnout (noun) /ˈbɜːnaʊt/: Physical or mental collapse caused by overwork or stress.

  7. incentivize (verb) /ɪnˈsentɪvaɪz/: To motivate or encourage someone to do something.

  8. tailored (adjective) /ˈteɪləd/: Made or adapted for a particular purpose or person.

  9. innovative (adjective) /ˈɪnəvətɪv/: Featuring new methods; advanced and original.

  10. collaborative (adjective) /kəˈlæbərətɪv/: Involving two or more parties working together.

Conclusion

The topic of work-life balance and government legislation is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. Other potential questions might include:

To practice, try writing your own essay on the question provided in this article. Share your essay in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active practice is an excellent way to improve your IELTS Writing skills and prepare for the exam.

For more insights on related topics, you might find these articles helpful:

Remember, consistent practice and exposure to a variety of topics will help you perform better in the IELTS Writing Task 2.

Exit mobile version