IELTS Writing Task 2: Should Governments Provide Universal Healthcare? (Band 6-9 Sample Essays)

Universal healthcare is a topic that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on past exam trends and current global healthcare discussions, it’s highly likely that questions related to government-provided healthcare will continue …

Universal Healthcare Concept

Universal healthcare is a topic that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on past exam trends and current global healthcare discussions, it’s highly likely that questions related to government-provided healthcare will continue to be prevalent in future IELTS tests. Let’s explore this topic through sample essays for different band scores, focusing on the following question:

Some people believe that governments should provide free healthcare for all citizens. Others think that this would be too expensive and there are better alternatives. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Analyzing the Question

This question requires us to:

  1. Discuss arguments for government-provided free healthcare
  2. Discuss arguments against it, including cost concerns and alternatives
  3. Present our own opinion on the matter

Let’s examine sample essays for different band scores, starting with a high-scoring essay.

Band 8-9 Sample Essay

Healthcare provision is a contentious issue in many countries, with some advocating for universal free healthcare while others argue against it due to financial constraints. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Proponents of government-funded healthcare argue that it is a fundamental human right that should be accessible to all citizens regardless of their financial status. They contend that a healthy population is more productive and contributes more to the economy, thus justifying the initial investment. Moreover, universal healthcare can prevent minor health issues from escalating into major, more costly problems, potentially saving money in the long run. Countries like Canada and the UK have demonstrated that universal healthcare systems can be successful in providing comprehensive care to their citizens.

On the other hand, critics argue that free healthcare for all is financially unsustainable, particularly for developing nations with limited resources. They point out that such systems often lead to longer wait times for treatments and can result in a decline in the quality of care due to overwhelming demand. Additionally, they suggest that a lack of competition in a government-monopolized system may stifle innovation in medical research and technology. These opponents often propose alternatives such as a mixed system with both public and private options or government subsidies for private insurance to ensure wider coverage while maintaining quality and efficiency.

In my opinion, while the ideal of universal free healthcare is admirable, its implementation must be carefully considered based on each country’s economic capabilities and healthcare infrastructure. I believe that a pragmatic approach would be to aim for universal coverage through a combination of public and private services, with government subsidies ensuring that basic healthcare remains affordable for all citizens. This hybrid model could potentially balance the need for accessible healthcare with financial sustainability and the benefits of market competition.

In conclusion, the debate over government-provided healthcare is complex, with valid arguments on both sides. Ultimately, each nation must find a solution that best serves its population’s needs while considering its economic realities.

(Word count: 309)

Universal Healthcare ConceptUniversal Healthcare Concept

Band 8-9 Essay Analysis

This essay demonstrates excellent qualities that justify a high band score:

  1. Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and clearly presenting a personal opinion.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively (e.g., “On the other hand”, “Moreover”, “Additionally”).

  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately (e.g., “contentious”, “fundamental human right”, “financially unsustainable”, “stifle innovation”).

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay demonstrates a wide range of grammatical structures used accurately and flexibly (e.g., complex sentences, passive voice, conditional structures).

  5. Development of Ideas: Each main point is well-developed with relevant examples and explanations.

Band 6-7 Sample Essay

Nowadays, there is a debate about whether governments should provide free healthcare for everyone. Some people think it’s a good idea, while others believe it’s too expensive. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

There are several reasons why free healthcare for all citizens is a good idea. Firstly, it ensures that everyone can get medical treatment when they need it, regardless of their income. This is especially important for poor people who might not be able to afford private healthcare. Secondly, when people can see a doctor easily, small health problems can be treated before they become serious and more expensive to treat. This could save money in the long term.

However, there are also arguments against free healthcare for everyone. The main problem is the high cost to the government. Providing free healthcare for all citizens would require a lot of money, which might mean higher taxes or less spending on other important areas like education or infrastructure. Another issue is that free healthcare systems often have long waiting times for treatment, which can be a problem for people who need urgent care.

In my opinion, while free healthcare for everyone is a good goal, it might not be possible for all countries, especially poorer ones. I think a better solution would be a mixed system where the government provides basic healthcare for everyone, but people can also choose to pay for private healthcare if they want faster or more specialized treatment. This way, everyone can get the care they need, but there is still room for choice and improvement in the system.

To conclude, providing free healthcare for all citizens has both advantages and disadvantages. While it would help ensure everyone can access medical care, it also comes with significant costs and challenges. A balanced approach that combines public and private healthcare might be the best solution for many countries.

(Word count: 309)

Band 6-7 Essay Analysis

This essay demonstrates qualities that place it in the Band 6-7 range:

  1. Task Response: The essay addresses all parts of the task, presenting both views and offering a personal opinion. However, the ideas could be more fully developed.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is generally well-organized with clear overall progression. Basic cohesive devices are used (e.g., “Firstly”, “Secondly”, “However”), but more sophisticated linking could enhance coherence.

  3. Lexical Resource: There is a sufficient range of vocabulary, with some attempts at less common words (e.g., “infrastructure”, “specialized treatment”). However, the language is sometimes repetitive.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is used, generally with good control. There are some errors, but they do not impede communication.

  5. Development of Ideas: Main ideas are relevant and supported, but some points could be elaborated further or supported with specific examples.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Universal healthcare (noun): A healthcare system that provides health coverage to all residents of a particular country or region.
    Pronunciation: /ˌjuːnɪˈvɜːsl ˈhelθkeə(r)/

  2. Subsidize (verb): To support financially, often through government funds.
    Pronunciation: /ˈsʌbsɪdaɪz/

  3. Infrastructure (noun): The basic physical and organizational structures needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.
    Pronunciation: /ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃə(r)/

  4. Contentious (adjective): Causing or likely to cause disagreement or argument.
    Pronunciation: /kənˈtenʃəs/

  5. Sustainable (adjective): Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level.
    Pronunciation: /səˈsteɪnəbl/

  6. Pragmatic (adjective): Dealing with things sensibly and realistically in a way that is based on practical rather than theoretical considerations.
    Pronunciation: /præɡˈmætɪk/

  7. Stifle (verb): To prevent or constrain (an activity or idea).
    Pronunciation: /ˈstaɪfl/

  8. Escalate (verb): To increase rapidly in extent or intensity.
    Pronunciation: /ˈeskəleɪt/

  9. Comprehensive (adjective): Including or dealing with all or nearly all elements or aspects of something.
    Pronunciation: /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/

  10. Monopolize (verb): To obtain exclusive possession or control of.
    Pronunciation: /məˈnɒpəlaɪz/

Conclusion

The topic of government-provided universal healthcare is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. To prepare effectively, practice writing essays on related themes such as:

  • The role of private healthcare in a country with universal public healthcare
  • The impact of universal healthcare on a country’s economy
  • Comparing different models of healthcare systems across countries
  • The challenges of implementing universal healthcare in developing nations

Remember to structure your essay clearly, use a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, and support your arguments with relevant examples. Feel free to practice by writing your own essay on this topic and sharing it in the comments section below. This active practice can significantly improve your IELTS Writing skills.