The question of government regulation in the fashion industry to prevent environmental waste has become increasingly prevalent in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on recent test reports and Fashion industry’s environmental impact, this topic has appeared multiple times in various forms, particularly in countries where fast fashion manufacturing is prominent.
Analysis of Recent IELTS Question
Some people believe that governments should regulate the fashion industry to reduce waste and environmental damage. Others think companies should be free to produce what consumers want. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Key Points to Consider:
- Two contrasting views on government regulation
- Environmental impact of fashion industry
- Consumer freedom and market forces
- Role of government in environmental protection
Government regulation vs free market in fashion industry
Band 8.5 Sample Essay
The debate over whether governments should impose restrictions on the fashion industry to protect the environment has gained significant attention. While some advocate for strict regulations, others support market-driven solutions. In my opinion, a balanced approach combining both regulatory oversight and market freedom is most effective.
Those supporting government intervention argue that the impact of fast fashion on environmental sustainability is too severe to be left unchecked. The fashion industry currently produces approximately 10% of global carbon emissions and generates massive textile waste. Regulatory measures such as mandatory recycling programs, sustainable material requirements, and production limits could effectively reduce this environmental impact.
However, proponents of free market principles contend that consumer choice should drive production decisions. They maintain that should fast fashion brands be regulated to prevent environmental harm, it could lead to job losses and higher clothing prices, particularly affecting lower-income consumers. Furthermore, market competition often drives innovation in sustainable practices naturally.
In my view, the optimal solution lies in implementing smart regulations while preserving market dynamics. Governments could establish environmental standards and incentivize sustainable practices while allowing companies flexibility in meeting these requirements. This approach would protect the environment without stifling innovation or severely restricting consumer choice.
Band 6.5 Sample Essay
The fashion industry’s impact on the environment is a big problem today. Some people think the government should control it, but others believe companies should be free to make what people want to buy.
People who support government control say that fashion companies make too much waste. Many clothes end up in landfills, and factories pollute the air and water. They think rules about recycling and using better materials would help solve these problems.
On the other hand, some people think companies should decide for themselves. They say that should governments impose stricter regulations on the fashion industry, it will make clothes more expensive and some people might lose their jobs. Also, they believe customers can choose to buy eco-friendly clothes if they want.
I think both sides have good points, but some government control is necessary. Companies should have some freedom, but they must also follow rules to protect the environment. This way, we can have both affordable clothes and a cleaner environment.
Key Vocabulary
- regulatory oversight (n) /ˌreɡjʊˈleɪtəri ˈəʊvəsaɪt/ – government supervision
- sustainable (adj) /səˈsteɪnəbl/ – environmentally responsible
- mandatory (adj) /ˈmændətəri/ – required by law
- incentivize (v) /ɪnˈsentɪvaɪz/ – encourage through rewards
- stifling (adj) /ˈstaɪflɪŋ/ – restricting or suppressing
Practice Suggestions
Try writing your own essay addressing this alternative question:
To what extent should governments enforce environmental regulations on fashion retailers?
Share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion. Remember to focus on clear structure, balanced arguments, and appropriate vocabulary usage.
