IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays and Analysis on Regulating Genetically Modified Foods

The topic of government regulation of genetically modified (GM) foods is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2. Based on analysis of past IELTS exams and current global issues, this subject has a high probability of appearing in future tests. Let’s explore a sample question and provide model essays to help you prepare for this challenging topic.

Analyzing the Question

Some people think that governments should regulate the sale of genetically modified foods. Others believe that people should be free to buy any food they want. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This question presents a classic IELTS Writing Task 2 format: discussing two opposing views and providing a personal opinion. The topic revolves around the controversy of GM foods and the role of government in regulating their sale. Let’s break down the key elements:

1. View 1: Governments should regulate GM food sales
2. View 2: People should have the freedom to buy any food
3. Task: Discuss both views
4. Personal opinion: Required

When approaching this question, it’s crucial to address both perspectives equally before presenting your own stance.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

The debate over whether governments should control the sale of genetically modified (GM) foods or allow consumers complete freedom of choice is a contentious issue in many countries. While both sides present valid arguments, I believe a balanced approach combining regulation and consumer education is the most effective solution.

Proponents of government regulation argue that oversight is necessary to ensure public safety and environmental protection. GM foods are relatively new, and their long-term effects on human health and ecosystems are not fully understood. By implementing strict regulations, governments can mandate thorough testing and labeling of GM products, allowing consumers to make informed decisions. Moreover, regulation can prevent potential monopolies in the food industry and protect biodiversity by limiting the spread of genetically modified organisms.

On the other hand, advocates for consumer freedom contend that individuals should have the right to choose what they eat without government interference. They argue that GM foods can offer numerous benefits, such as increased crop yields, enhanced nutritional value, and resistance to pests and diseases. Restricting access to these products could hinder scientific progress and limit potential solutions to global food security challenges. Additionally, some believe that market forces will naturally regulate the industry, with consumer demand driving the success or failure of GM products.

In my opinion, a nuanced approach that balances regulation and consumer choice is ideal. Governments should establish rigorous safety standards and mandatory labeling for GM foods, ensuring transparency and allowing consumers to make informed decisions. However, they should not outright ban or severely restrict GM products that meet these standards. This approach would protect public health and the environment while still fostering innovation and respecting individual freedom.

Furthermore, governments should invest in public education campaigns to help citizens understand the science behind GM foods, their potential benefits, and any associated risks. By empowering consumers with knowledge, they can make choices aligned with their values and health concerns.

In conclusion, while the regulation of GM foods is a complex issue, a balanced strategy that combines government oversight with consumer education and choice offers the best path forward. This approach would safeguard public interests while still allowing for scientific advancement and personal freedom in food selection.

Genetically Modified Food Regulation

Analysis of Band 8-9 Essay

This essay demonstrates several key features that contribute to its high band score:

1. Coherent structure: The essay follows a clear four-paragraph structure, introducing the topic, discussing both views, presenting a personal opinion, and concluding effectively.

2. Balanced argument: Both perspectives are thoroughly explored with specific examples and reasoning.

3. Clear position: The writer’s opinion is clearly stated and supported with a nuanced approach.

4. Cohesive devices: Transitions like “On the other hand,” “Moreover,” and “Furthermore” enhance the essay’s flow.

5. Lexical resource: Advanced vocabulary is used accurately (e.g., “contentious,” “nuanced,” “fostering innovation”).

6. Grammatical range: Complex sentence structures and a variety of tenses are employed correctly.

7. Task response: All parts of the question are fully addressed, including both views and a personal opinion.

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The question of whether governments should control the sale of genetically modified (GM) foods or let people buy any food they want is a big issue today. There are good reasons for both sides, and I will discuss them before giving my opinion.

Some people think governments should regulate GM foods. They say this is important for safety reasons. GM foods are new and we don’t know all the effects they might have on our health or the environment. If the government checks these foods, they can make sure they are safe before people eat them. Also, regulation can make companies label GM foods so people know what they are buying.

However, other people believe we should be free to buy any food we want. They think GM foods can be good because they might grow better or have more vitamins. If the government stops people from buying these foods, we might miss out on these benefits. They also say that people should have the right to choose what they eat without the government telling them what to do.

In my opinion, I think there should be some government regulation, but not too much. The government should check that GM foods are safe and make sure they are labeled. But they shouldn’t ban them completely. This way, people can still choose if they want to buy GM foods or not, but they can be sure the foods are safe.

To conclude, while there are good arguments on both sides, I believe a mix of some regulation and freedom of choice is the best way to handle GM foods. This can keep people safe while still letting them make their own decisions about what to eat.

Analysis of Band 6-7 Essay

This essay demonstrates several characteristics that place it in the Band 6-7 range:

1. Structure: The essay follows a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs for each view, a personal opinion, and a conclusion.

2. Task response: All parts of the question are addressed, including both views and a personal opinion.

3. Coherence: The ideas are generally well-organized and easy to follow.

4. Vocabulary: There is a mix of common and some less common vocabulary (e.g., “regulate,” “environment,” “vitamins”).

5. Grammar: Sentence structures are mostly simple, with some attempts at more complex constructions.

6. Development: Ideas are explained, but could benefit from more specific examples or deeper analysis.

7. Cohesive devices: Basic linking words are used (e.g., “However,” “Also”), but could be more varied.

To improve this essay to a higher band score, the writer could:

• Use more advanced vocabulary and idiomatic expressions
• Employ a wider range of complex grammatical structures
• Provide more specific examples and deeper analysis of the arguments
• Use a greater variety of cohesive devices to improve flow

Key Vocabulary for GM Food Regulation Essays

1. Genetically modified (GM) (adjective) /dʒəˈnetɪkəli ˈmɒdɪfaɪd/: Altered through genetic engineering techniques.

2. Regulation (noun) /ˌreɡjʊˈleɪʃən/: Rules or directives made and maintained by an authority.

3. Consumer choice (noun phrase) /kənˈsjuːmə tʃɔɪs/: The ability of buyers to decide what products to purchase.

4. Food security (noun phrase) /fuːd sɪˈkjʊərəti/: The state of having reliable access to sufficient, affordable, nutritious food.

5. Biodiversity (noun) /ˌbaɪəʊdaɪˈvɜːsəti/: The variety of plant and animal life in a particular habitat or ecosystem.

6. Oversight (noun) /ˈəʊvəsaɪt/: The action of overseeing something, especially the supervision or management of a project or operation.

7. Labeling (noun) /ˈleɪbəlɪŋ/: The action of attaching information to a product.

8. Innovation (noun) /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃən/: The action or process of introducing new ideas, methods, or products.

9. Transparency (noun) /trænsˈpærənsi/: The quality of being open, honest, and easily understood.

10. Nuanced (adjective) /ˈnjuːɑːnst/: Characterized by subtle differences or distinctions in expression or meaning.

Conclusion

The topic of government regulation of GM foods is likely to remain relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2. To prepare, practice writing essays that discuss both the need for regulation and the importance of consumer choice. Consider exploring related topics such as:

• The impact of GM foods on global food security
• Ethical considerations in genetic engineering of crops
• The role of biotechnology in addressing climate change and agricultural challenges

Remember to always analyze the question carefully, provide balanced arguments, and clearly state your own opinion. By practicing with various prompts and studying high-scoring sample essays, you can improve your writing skills and boost your IELTS Writing Task 2 score.

We encourage you to write your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments section below. This practice will help you refine your skills and receive feedback from others preparing for the IELTS exam.