Genetically modified (GM) foods have been a topic of debate in recent years, and questions about their regulation frequently appear in IELTS Writing Task 2. This topic combines elements of science, health, and government policy, making it a complex and engaging subject for test-takers. Based on past exam trends and the current relevance of GM foods, we can expect this theme to continue appearing in future IELTS tests.
One common question that has appeared in past IELTS exams and is likely to resurface is:
Some people think that the government should regulate the use of genetically modified foods, while others think that people should have freedom to choose what they eat. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Let’s analyze this question and provide sample essays for different band scores.
Question Analysis
This question requires you to discuss two contrasting views on the regulation of GM foods:
- The government should regulate GM foods
- People should have the freedom to choose what they eat
You need to explore both perspectives and then provide your own opinion. Remember to support your arguments with relevant examples and explanations.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
Genetic modification of food has become a contentious issue, with some advocating for government regulation while others champion consumer choice. This essay will examine both viewpoints before presenting my own perspective on this complex matter.
Those in favor of government regulation argue that GM foods pose potential risks to human health and the environment, necessitating strict oversight. They contend that without proper controls, corporations might prioritize profits over safety, potentially introducing harmful products into the food supply. Moreover, ethical concerns in genetic engineering such as the long-term effects on biodiversity and ecosystems warrant careful monitoring by authorities. By implementing comprehensive regulations, governments can ensure that only thoroughly tested and safe GM products reach consumers.
On the other hand, proponents of individual choice maintain that people should have the autonomy to decide what they consume. They argue that GM foods offer numerous benefits, including increased crop yields, enhanced nutritional value, and improved resistance to pests and diseases. Restricting access to these products, they claim, infringes upon personal freedom and potentially hampers scientific progress. Furthermore, they assert that market forces will naturally regulate the industry, with consumers gravitating towards products they deem safe and beneficial.
In my opinion, a balanced approach that combines government regulation with consumer choice is the most prudent course of action. While I believe that individuals should have the right to make informed decisions about their diet, I also recognize the need for oversight to ensure public safety. Governments should implement stringent testing and labeling requirements for GM foods, allowing consumers to make educated choices based on accurate information. This approach would protect public health while preserving individual autonomy.
In conclusion, the regulation of GM foods is a nuanced issue that requires careful consideration of both safety concerns and personal freedoms. By striking a balance between government oversight and consumer choice, we can harness the potential benefits of genetic modification while mitigating its risks.
(Word count: 310)
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
The topic of genetically modified foods is controversial, with different opinions on whether the government should control them or not. This essay will discuss both sides and give my view.
Some people think the government should regulate GM foods. They worry about the safety of these foods and their impact on health and the environment. They believe that without rules, companies might sell unsafe products just to make money. Also, they think GM foods could harm nature and other plants. By making rules, the government can make sure only safe GM foods are sold.
On the other hand, some people believe we should be free to choose what we eat. They say GM foods have good points, like making more food and making crops stronger against pests. They think that if people don’t want GM foods, they won’t buy them, so the market will control itself. They also say that too many rules might stop scientists from making new discoveries.
In my opinion, I think we need both government rules and freedom to choose. The government should check GM foods to make sure they’re safe and make companies label them clearly. This way, people can know what they’re buying and decide for themselves. But the rules shouldn’t be so strict that they stop all GM foods from being made.
To sum up, the question of GM foods is complicated. We need to find a balance between keeping people safe and letting them make their own choices. With good rules and clear information, people can decide what’s best for them while staying safe.
(Word count: 267)
Sample Essay 3 (Band 5-6)
Genetically modified foods are a big topic today. Some people want the government to control them, but others want to choose freely. I will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.
First, some people think the government should make rules for GM foods. They are worried these foods might not be safe to eat. They also think GM foods could be bad for nature. If the government makes rules, they can check the foods before people buy them. This could keep everyone safe.
But other people say we should choose what we eat. They think GM foods are good because they can make more food for everyone. They also say that if people don’t like GM foods, they won’t buy them. So, they don’t think we need many rules.
I think both sides have good points. It’s important to be safe, but people also like to choose their own food. Maybe the government can make some rules to check if the foods are safe. But they should also let people decide if they want to buy GM foods or not.
In the end, I think we need both some rules and some freedom. The government should check if GM foods are safe, but people should be able to choose what they want to eat. This way, everyone can be happy and safe.
(Word count: 219)
Explanation of Band Scores
Band 8-9 Essay:
- Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a well-developed response.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression throughout.
- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy.
Band 6-7 Essay:
- Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task, though some aspects are more fully covered than others.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Information and ideas are generally well organized with clear overall progression.
- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task with some errors in word choice.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms with some errors that do not impede communication.
Band 5-6 Essay:
- Task Achievement: Addresses the task only partially, with limited development of ideas.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Presents information with some organization but may lack overall progression.
- Lexical Resource: Uses a limited range of vocabulary, adequate for basic communication.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses mainly simple sentences with limited accuracy in more complex structures.
Key Vocabulary to Remember
-
Genetically modified (GM) (adjective) /dʒəˈnetɪkəli ˈmɒdɪfaɪd/: Altered using genetic engineering techniques.
-
Regulation (noun) /ˌreɡjʊˈleɪʃən/: The action or process of controlling something.
-
Autonomy (noun) /ɔːˈtɒnəmi/: Freedom from external control or influence.
-
Contentious (adjective) /kənˈtenʃəs/: Causing or likely to cause disagreement or argument.
-
Oversight (noun) /ˈəʊvəsaɪt/: The action of overseeing something; supervision.
-
Biodiversity (noun) /ˌbaɪəʊdaɪˈvɜːsəti/: The variety of plant and animal life in a particular habitat.
-
Stringent (adjective) /ˈstrɪndʒənt/: Strict, precise, and exacting.
-
Mitigate (verb) /ˈmɪtɪɡeɪt/: Make less severe, serious, or painful.
In conclusion, the regulation of genetically modified foods is a complex and relevant topic in IELTS Writing Task 2. By understanding the different perspectives and using appropriate vocabulary and structures, you can craft a well-argued essay. Remember to always address all parts of the question, provide relevant examples, and clearly state your own opinion.
To further improve your skills, try writing your own essay on this topic or related ones such as:
- The impact of GM crops on developing countries
- The role of biotechnology in solving global food shortages
- Ethical considerations in genetic engineering of food
Practice regularly and share your essays in the comments section below for feedback and discussion. This active approach to learning will help you become more confident and proficient in tackling IELTS Writing Task 2 questions on GM foods and other challenging topics.