Site icon IETLS.NET

IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Government Space Exploration Funding with Band Score Analysis

Government funding debate between space exploration and earthly needs

Government funding debate between space exploration and earthly needs

Space exploration has been a recurring topic in IELTS Writing Task 2, appearing approximately once every 4-5 months in recent years. Based on analysis of past exam questions from 2018-2023, this topic frequently appears in different forms, particularly focusing on government spending and resource allocation. Let’s explore one of the most common question types on this subject.

Space exploration and colonization remains a controversial topic when it comes to government spending priorities.

Question Analysis

Some people think that governments should spend money on space exploration, while others believe that money should be used to solve problems on Earth. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This question requires candidates to:

  • Discuss arguments for and against government spending on space exploration
  • Present a balanced analysis of both perspectives
  • Provide a clear personal stance
  • Support arguments with relevant examples

Government funding debate between space exploration and earthly needsGovernment funding debate between space exploration and earthly needs

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8.5)

The allocation of government funds between space exploration and terrestrial issues has become a matter of intense debate. While some advocate for increased space research investment, others argue that these resources should address immediate earthly concerns. I believe a balanced approach that maintains space exploration while prioritizing pressing terrestrial issues is optimal.

Those supporting space exploration funding argue that it drives technological innovation and scientific advancement. The research and development required for space missions have led to numerous practical applications, from satellite technology enabling global communications to medical breakthroughs in imaging technology. Moreover, impact of space exploration on new technology shows that these investments often yield unexpected benefits for everyday life.

However, critics contend that with pressing issues like poverty, healthcare deficits, and environmental degradation, government resources should focus on immediate earthly challenges. They argue that while space exploration is fascinating, basic human needs must take precedence. For instance, the billions spent on Mars missions could fund extensive poverty alleviation programs or climate change initiatives.

In my view, while addressing terrestrial problems should be the primary focus, completely abandoning space exploration would be shortsighted. A balanced approach where governments maintain space programs while allocating the majority of resources to immediate societal needs would be most beneficial. This strategy ensures continued scientific progress while acknowledging our responsibility to address pressing earthly concerns.

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6.5)

The question of whether governments should spend money on space exploration or focus on Earth’s problems is very important today. Both sides have their reasons, and I will discuss them here.

On one side, people think space exploration is important. It helps us learn new things about science and technology. For example, when scientists work on space projects, they create new inventions that can help people on Earth. Also, should governments fund space exploration because it might help us find new resources or places to live in the future.

But other people say we should solve Earth’s problems first. There are many poor people who need food and homes. Also, there are big problems like pollution and global warming that need money to fix. They think it’s not right to spend money on space when people are suffering on Earth.

I think both sides make good points, but I agree more with focusing on Earth’s problems first. While space exploration is interesting and useful, we should take care of our basic problems before spending lots of money on space projects. Maybe we can do both, but with more money for Earth’s problems.

Score Analysis

Band 8.5 Essay Analysis:

  • Task Response: Fully addresses all parts of the task with well-developed positions
  • Coherence and Cohesion: Logical organization with clear progression
  • Lexical Resource: Sophisticated vocabulary use (“allocation”, “terrestrial”, “precedence”)
  • Grammar: Complex structures used accurately

Band 6.5 Essay Analysis:

  • Task Response: Addresses main points but less developed
  • Coherence and Cohesion: Basic organization with some progression
  • Lexical Resource: Adequate but simpler vocabulary
  • Grammar: Mix of simple and complex structures with some errors

Key Vocabulary

  1. allocation (n) /ˌæləˈkeɪʃn/ – the distribution of resources
  2. terrestrial (adj) /təˈrestriəl/ – relating to Earth
  3. precedence (n) /ˈpresɪdəns/ – priority in importance
  4. innovation (n) /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃn/ – new methods or ideas
  5. degradation (n) /ˌdegrəˈdeɪʃn/ – deterioration in quality

Conclusion

This topic will likely remain relevant in future IELTS tests. Practice writing about similar themes such as:

  • Technology investment vs social welfare
  • Scientific research funding priorities
  • how to invest in mutual funds and government resource allocation

We encourage you to practice writing your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments for feedback and discussion.

Exit mobile version