The topic of government subsidies for electric public transportation has become increasingly relevant in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on recent test reports and analyses from various IELTS preparation centers, this theme has appeared multiple times in different forms, particularly in questions about environmental protection and urban development. Let’s examine a common variant of this question that test-takers might encounter.
Analysis of the Task
Some people believe that governments should provide subsidies to accelerate the development of electric public transport systems in cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
This question requires candidates to express their opinion on government financial support for electric public transportation. It’s crucial to understand that this is an agree/disagree essay type where you must take a clear position and support it with relevant arguments.
Model Answer 1 (Band 8.5)
I strongly agree that governments should provide financial support to develop electric public transportation systems, as this investment can yield significant environmental and social benefits while promoting sustainable urban development.
The primary argument for government subsidies in electric public transport lies in its environmental impact. Traditional fossil-fuel-based vehicles are major contributors to urban air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. By investing in Reducing fossil fuel usage globally, cities can significantly reduce their carbon footprint and improve air quality. For instance, when London introduced electric buses on major routes, it reported a substantial decrease in carbon emissions and particulate matter in the air.
Furthermore, government support for electric public transport can catalyze technological innovation and economic growth. When authorities invest in sustainable transportation infrastructure, it creates opportunities for research and development in clean energy technologies. This investment can stimulate job creation in manufacturing, maintenance, and operations sectors. Additionally, how green finance can promote environmental sustainability demonstrates that such initiatives can attract private sector participation and foreign investment.
The social benefits of subsidized electric public transport are equally compelling. By making clean transportation more accessible and affordable, governments can ensure equal mobility opportunities for all citizens, regardless of their economic status. Moreover, efficient public transport systems reduce traffic congestion and commuting times, leading to improved quality of life for urban residents.
In conclusion, government subsidies for electric public transport represent a crucial investment in our future. The environmental, economic, and social benefits far outweigh the initial financial costs, making it a worthy focus for public spending.
Government officials discussing electric transport subsidy implementation with stakeholders
Model Answer 2 (Band 6.5)
I agree that governments should give money to help develop electric public transport in cities because it is good for the environment and people.
Firstly, electric buses and trains are better for the environment than normal vehicles. They don’t produce pollution like cars and buses that use petrol or diesel. This is important because many cities have bad air quality that makes people sick. When governments help pay for electric transport, they help make the air cleaner for everyone.
Also, Investment in public transportation vs. roads shows that public transport helps reduce traffic problems. When more people use buses and trains, there are fewer cars on the roads. This means less traffic jams and faster travel times for everyone. Electric public transport is expensive to start, but governments should help because it helps all citizens.
Another good thing is that electric transport can save money in the long term. Although it costs a lot at the start, electric vehicles don’t need to buy expensive fuel. This means cities can save money after some years. The impact of electric vehicles on public infrastructure shows that these systems can be cheaper to maintain.
In conclusion, I think governments should help pay for electric public transport because it helps the environment, reduces traffic, and can save money later.
Analysis of Band Scores
Band 8.5 Essay Analysis:
- Sophisticated vocabulary and complex structures
- Clear, logical organization with well-developed ideas
- Effective use of examples and specific details
- Strong cohesion and coherence throughout
- Minimal grammatical errors
Band 6.5 Essay Analysis:
- Simple but clear vocabulary
- Basic organization with some development
- Limited use of complex structures
- Some repetition and simple linking
- Occasional errors that don’t impede understanding
Key Vocabulary to Remember
- Subsidy (n) /ˈsʌbsɪdi/ – financial support from government
- Infrastructure (n) /ˈɪnfrəstrʌktʃər/ – basic physical systems of a country
- Sustainable (adj) /səˈsteɪnəbəl/ – able to continue over time without damaging the environment
- Implementation (n) /ˌɪmplɪmenˈteɪʃən/ – the process of putting a plan into action
- Carbon footprint (n) /ˈkɑːbən ˈfʊtprɪnt/ – amount of carbon dioxide released into atmosphere
- Catalyze (v) /ˈkætəlaɪz/ – to cause or accelerate change or action
- Particulate matter (n) /pɑːˈtɪkjʊlət ˈmætər/ – tiny particles of pollution in the air
- Mobility (n) /məʊˈbɪləti/ – ability to move freely and easily
For practice, try writing your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments. Consider also exploring related topics such as should governments subsidize electric cars for mass adoption to broaden your understanding of environmental policy writing.
