The question of whether higher education institutions should prioritize technical over theoretical knowledge is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2. This topic has appeared in various forms over the years, reflecting its relevance to modern education debates. Based on past trends, we can expect this subject to continue featuring in future IELTS exams. Let’s examine a specific question that encapsulates this theme:
Some people think that universities should focus on providing academic skills to students. Others believe that universities should focus on providing practical job skills to students. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analyzing the Question
This question asks candidates to discuss two contrasting views on the purpose of university education: academic (theoretical) skills versus practical job skills. The task requires a balanced discussion of both perspectives, followed by the writer’s personal opinion. It’s crucial to address all parts of the question and provide a clear stance in the conclusion.
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
In the ongoing debate about the role of universities, some argue for a focus on academic skills, while others advocate for practical job training. This essay will examine both viewpoints before presenting my own perspective on this complex issue.
Proponents of academic-focused education assert that universities should prioritize theoretical knowledge and critical thinking skills. They argue that a strong foundation in academic disciplines equips students with the ability to analyze complex problems, innovate, and adapt to changing circumstances throughout their careers. For instance, a philosophy graduate may not directly apply Aristotelian ethics in their job, but the critical thinking skills honed through such study can be invaluable in various professional contexts.
On the other hand, those favoring practical job skills contend that universities should prepare students for immediate employment upon graduation. This view emphasizes the importance of industry-specific knowledge and technical proficiency. Supporters argue that this approach reduces the gap between education and employment, potentially lowering unemployment rates and increasing economic productivity. For example, a computer science program focusing on current programming languages and software development practices could produce graduates who are immediately valuable to tech companies.
In my opinion, the ideal approach lies in striking a balance between these two perspectives. Universities should aim to provide a solid theoretical foundation while also incorporating practical elements relevant to future careers. This balanced approach would produce well-rounded graduates capable of both abstract thinking and practical application. For instance, a medical school could combine in-depth study of human physiology with hands-on clinical experience, preparing students for both the intellectual and practical demands of healthcare.
In conclusion, while both academic skills and job-specific training have their merits, I believe universities should strive to integrate both aspects into their curricula. This holistic approach would best serve students, employers, and society at large by fostering graduates who are both intellectually capable and professionally competent.
(Word count: 309)
Balanced approach in higher education
Essay Analysis
This essay demonstrates several key features of a high-scoring IELTS Writing Task 2 response:
-
Clear structure: The essay follows a logical structure with an introduction, two body paragraphs discussing each viewpoint, a paragraph for personal opinion, and a conclusion.
-
Balanced discussion: Both perspectives are given equal attention and explained with examples.
-
Clear position: The writer’s opinion is clearly stated and supported with reasoning.
-
Cohesion and coherence: Ideas flow logically, and paragraphs are well-connected using appropriate linking words.
-
Lexical resource: The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary accurately (e.g., “innovate,” “adapt,” “honed,” “proficiency”).
-
Grammatical range and accuracy: Complex sentence structures are used correctly throughout the essay.
-
Task response: All parts of the question are fully addressed, including the discussion of both views and the writer’s opinion.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
These days, there is a debate about what universities should teach students. Some people think they should focus on academic skills, while others believe practical job skills are more important. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.
Those who support academic skills say that universities should teach students how to think critically and understand complex theories. They believe this kind of education helps students become smarter and more adaptable in their future careers. For example, studying literature can improve a person’s ability to analyze and understand different perspectives, which can be useful in many jobs.
On the other hand, supporters of practical job skills argue that universities should prepare students for specific jobs. They think this approach will help students find work more easily after graduation. For instance, a business course that teaches real accounting software could help graduates start working in finance companies right away.
In my opinion, universities should try to include both academic and practical skills in their programs. I think this is the best way to prepare students for their future. By learning both types of skills, students can understand the theory behind their work and also know how to do practical tasks. This combination would make them more valuable to employers and better prepared for different challenges in their careers.
To conclude, while both academic and practical skills are important, I believe universities should aim to teach both. This balanced approach would give students the best chance of success in their future careers and lives.
(Word count: 261)
University classroom with diverse learning methods
Essay Analysis
This essay demonstrates characteristics of a Band 6-7 response:
-
Structure: The essay has a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. However, the development of ideas is less sophisticated compared to the Band 8-9 essay.
-
Task response: The essay addresses all parts of the task, discussing both views and providing an opinion. However, the explanations and examples are less detailed.
-
Coherence and cohesion: The essay is generally coherent, but the use of cohesive devices is less varied and sometimes repetitive (e.g., frequent use of “they think/believe”).
-
Lexical resource: The vocabulary used is appropriate but less advanced compared to the higher band essay. There’s less precision in word choice and fewer idiomatic expressions.
-
Grammatical range and accuracy: The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentences, but with less variety and sophistication than the Band 8-9 essay. There are no major grammatical errors, but the range is more limited.
-
Development of ideas: Ideas are presented clearly but with less depth and fewer supporting details compared to the higher band essay.
Key Vocabulary
-
prioritize (verb) /praɪˈɒrətaɪz/ – to decide which of a group of things are the most important so that you can deal with them first
-
theoretical (adjective) /θɪəˈretɪkl/ – based on the ideas that relate to a subject, not the practical uses of that subject
-
practical (adjective) /ˈpræktɪkl/ – relating to experience, real situations or actions rather than ideas or imagination
-
curriculum (noun) /kəˈrɪkjələm/ – the subjects that are included in a course of study or taught in a school, college, etc.
-
adaptable (adjective) /əˈdæptəbl/ – able to change or be changed in order to fit or work better in some situation or for some purpose
-
proficiency (noun) /prəˈfɪʃnsi/ – the ability to do something well because of training and practice
-
holistic (adjective) /həʊˈlɪstɪk/ – dealing with or treating the whole of something or someone and not just a part
-
integrate (verb) /ˈɪntɪɡreɪt/ – to combine two or more things so that they work together
-
innovative (adjective) /ˈɪnəveɪtɪv/ – introducing or using new ideas, ways of doing something, etc.
-
competent (adjective) /ˈkɒmpɪtənt/ – having enough skill or knowledge to do something well or to the necessary standard
Conclusion
The debate on whether higher education should prioritize technical or theoretical knowledge remains a relevant and challenging topic in IELTS Writing Task 2. As demonstrated in the sample essays, a successful response requires a balanced discussion of both perspectives, clear organization, and a well-supported personal opinion.
To further improve your skills, consider practicing with similar topics such as:
- The role of vocational education versus traditional university degrees
- The importance of soft skills versus technical skills in the job market
- The impact of technology on the balance between practical and theoretical education
Remember to focus on developing a clear structure, using a range of vocabulary and grammatical structures, and providing relevant examples to support your arguments. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you refine your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS Writing Task 2.
