Illustration of prisoners' voting rights debate Illustration of prisoners' voting rights debate

IELTS Writing Task 2: Sample Essays on Prisoners’ Voting Rights (Band 6-9)

The topic of prisoners’ right to vote has gained significant attention in recent IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on trends observed in past exams and discussions on reputable IELTS preparation websites, this subject is likely to appear with increasing frequency in future tests. Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:

Some people believe that prisoners should have the right to vote, while others think they should be denied this right. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analyzing the Question

This question requires candidates to:

  1. Discuss arguments for allowing prisoners to vote
  2. Discuss arguments against allowing prisoners to vote
  3. Provide their personal opinion on the issue

It’s crucial to address all three aspects in your essay to achieve a high band score.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Voting rights for incarcerated individuals is a contentious issue that sparks heated debates in many societies. While some argue that prisoners should retain their right to vote, others believe this privilege should be revoked during their incarceration. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Proponents of prisoner voting rights argue that maintaining civic engagement is crucial for rehabilitation and reintegration. They contend that allowing inmates to participate in the democratic process keeps them connected to society and encourages a sense of responsibility. Furthermore, supporters emphasize that voting is a fundamental human right that should not be stripped away, regardless of one’s circumstances. They also point out that denying prisoners the vote can disproportionately affect certain demographic groups, potentially exacerbating existing social inequalities.

On the other hand, those opposed to prisoner voting rights often argue that individuals who have broken the law forfeit certain privileges, including the right to influence societal decisions through voting. They believe that voting is a civic duty that requires adherence to societal norms, which prisoners have violated. Additionally, critics worry that allowing prisoners to vote could lead to the formation of a significant voting bloc that might influence elections in ways that do not align with the interests of law-abiding citizens.

In my opinion, a nuanced approach to this issue is necessary. While I believe that the right to vote should be preserved for most prisoners, there may be justifiable exceptions for those convicted of the most serious crimes, such as treason or electoral fraud. This balanced approach would maintain the rehabilitative benefits of civic engagement for the majority of inmates while addressing concerns about the integrity of the democratic process. Moreover, it would send a powerful message about the importance of responsible citizenship without completely disenfranchising a segment of the population.

In conclusion, the debate over prisoners’ voting rights is complex and multifaceted. By adopting a measured approach that considers both the rights of prisoners and the concerns of society at large, we can strike a balance that upholds democratic principles while maintaining the integrity of our electoral systems.

(Word count: 329)

Illustration of prisoners' voting rights debateIllustration of prisoners' voting rights debate

Essay Analysis (Band 8-9)

This essay demonstrates excellent qualities that justify a high band score:

  1. Task Response: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear and well-developed response with a balanced discussion of both views and a clear personal opinion.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is well-organized with clear progression throughout. Each paragraph has a clear central topic, and ideas are logically sequenced. Cohesive devices are used effectively and appropriately.

  3. Lexical Resource: The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features. Key terms are used accurately and appropriately.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay displays a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy. There are no noticeable errors, and various complex structures are used effectively.

  5. Development of Ideas: Each point is well-elaborated with relevant examples and explanations, demonstrating a sophisticated approach to idea development.

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The question of whether prisoners should be allowed to vote is a difficult one. There are arguments on both sides of this issue, and I will discuss them before giving my own opinion.

Some people think prisoners should have the right to vote. They say that voting is a basic human right that shouldn’t be taken away, even from people in jail. They also argue that letting prisoners vote helps them stay connected to society and might make it easier for them to rejoin society after they get out. Another point is that not allowing prisoners to vote might unfairly affect certain groups of people more than others.

On the other hand, there are those who believe prisoners shouldn’t be allowed to vote. They think that when someone breaks the law, they lose some of their rights, including the right to vote. These people say that voting is a responsibility that requires following society’s rules, which prisoners have not done. They also worry that if prisoners can vote, they might form a large group of voters that could change election results in ways that most people wouldn’t like.

In my opinion, I think that most prisoners should be allowed to vote, but maybe not all of them. For example, people who have committed very serious crimes like murder might lose their right to vote. But for most prisoners, I think voting could help them feel more connected to society and might encourage them to be better citizens when they get out of jail.

To sum up, the issue of prisoners voting is complicated. While there are good arguments on both sides, I believe a middle ground approach that allows most prisoners to vote is the best solution. This way, we can respect human rights while also considering the concerns of society.

(Word count: 295)

Essay Analysis (Band 6-7)

This essay demonstrates good qualities that justify a band score of 6-7:

  1. Task Response: The essay addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position with some development. The discussion of both views is present, though less detailed than in the higher band essay.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is generally well-organized with clear overall progression. Paragraphing is logical, and basic cohesive devices are used effectively, though with less sophistication than in higher band essays.

  3. Lexical Resource: The essay uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. There are attempts to use less common vocabulary, though with occasional inaccuracy. The language is generally appropriate for the topic.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. There are some errors, but they do not impede communication. The range of structures is good, though less varied than in higher band essays.

  5. Development of Ideas: Each main point is relevant to the task and is supported with some explanation. However, the ideas are less fully extended compared to the higher band essay.

Prisoners casting votes in a ballot boxPrisoners casting votes in a ballot box

Key Vocabulary

  1. Incarcerated (adjective) – /ɪnˈkɑːsəreɪtɪd/ – imprisoned or confined
  2. Civic engagement (noun phrase) – /ˈsɪvɪk ɪnˈɡeɪdʒmənt/ – participation in public life and affairs
  3. Disenfranchise (verb) – /ˌdɪsɪnˈfræntʃaɪz/ – deprive of the right to vote
  4. Rehabilitative (adjective) – /ˌriːəˈbɪlɪteɪtɪv/ – intended to restore someone to health or normal life
  5. Contentious (adjective) – /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing or likely to cause disagreement
  6. Forfeit (verb) – /ˈfɔːrfɪt/ – lose or give up as a consequence of wrongdoing
  7. Nuanced (adjective) – /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ – characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression

Conclusion

The topic of prisoners’ voting rights is a complex and thought-provoking subject for IELTS Writing Task 2. As you prepare for your exam, consider practicing with similar topics such as:

  1. The rights of ex-prisoners after serving their sentences
  2. The role of rehabilitation in the prison system
  3. Balancing punishment and reform in criminal justice

Remember to structure your essay clearly, address all parts of the question, and support your arguments with relevant examples. We encourage you to practice writing your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active practice is an excellent way to improve your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS exam.