The topic of whether students should have the freedom to choose their school curriculum has been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on historical trends and current educational debates, this subject is likely to appear in future tests. Let’s explore a sample question that closely resembles past exam topics and provides valuable practice for IELTS candidates.
Some people think that students should be allowed to choose their school subjects according to their own interests. Others believe that subjects should be chosen for students by teachers or parents. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analysis of the Question
This question presents two contrasting viewpoints on student curriculum choice:
- Students should have the freedom to select their subjects based on personal interests.
- Teachers or parents should determine students’ subjects.
The task requires candidates to discuss both perspectives and provide their own opinion. A balanced approach is necessary, exploring the advantages and disadvantages of each view before presenting a well-reasoned personal stance.
Model Essay 1 (Band 8)
The debate over who should have the final say in choosing school subjects – students themselves or adults such as teachers and parents – is a contentious issue in modern education. While both sides present valid arguments, I believe that a balanced approach combining student input with adult guidance is the most effective solution.
Those who advocate for student choice argue that allowing young people to select their own subjects increases motivation and engagement. When students pursue topics that genuinely interest them, they are more likely to be enthusiastic learners and achieve better academic results. Moreover, this approach helps students develop important decision-making skills and take responsibility for their education. In an increasingly diverse job market, the ability to make informed choices about one’s learning path is invaluable.
On the other hand, proponents of adult-directed subject selection contend that teachers and parents have the experience and foresight to make better long-term decisions for students. They argue that young people may not fully understand the implications of their choices or may select subjects based on short-term preferences rather than long-term benefits. Additionally, adults can ensure that students receive a well-rounded education that includes fundamental subjects necessary for future academic and professional success.
In my opinion, the ideal approach lies in striking a balance between these two perspectives. Students should be given a degree of freedom to choose subjects that align with their interests and aspirations, but within a framework established by educational experts. This could involve a core curriculum of essential subjects complemented by a range of electives. Parents and teachers should play a supportive role, offering guidance and helping students make informed decisions rather than dictating choices entirely.
In conclusion, while the freedom to choose subjects can foster student engagement and personal development, it should be balanced with the wisdom and experience of educators and parents. By combining student input with adult guidance, we can create an educational system that is both motivating and comprehensive, preparing young people for the challenges of the future.
(Word count: 309)
Students discussing curriculum choices in classroom
Model Essay 2 (Band 7)
The question of who should decide on students’ school subjects has been a topic of debate in educational circles. While some believe students should have the freedom to choose based on their interests, others argue that teachers or parents should make these decisions. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and provide my personal opinion.
Those in favor of student choice argue that it increases motivation and engagement in learning. When students select subjects they are passionate about, they are more likely to be interested in their studies and perform better academically. This approach also helps students develop decision-making skills and take responsibility for their education, which are valuable life skills. For example, a student who chooses to study biology because of their interest in nature may be more motivated to pursue a career in environmental science.
On the other hand, supporters of teacher or parent-directed subject selection believe that adults have the experience and knowledge to make better long-term decisions for students. They argue that young people may not fully understand the implications of their choices or may select subjects based on temporary interests rather than future benefits. Adults can ensure that students receive a well-rounded education that includes essential subjects necessary for their future academic and professional development.
In my opinion, a combination of both approaches would be most beneficial. Students should have some freedom to choose subjects that interest them, but within a framework established by educational experts. This could involve a core curriculum of fundamental subjects, complemented by a range of elective options. Parents and teachers should provide guidance and support to help students make informed decisions, rather than making choices for them entirely.
To conclude, while allowing students to choose their subjects can enhance engagement and personal development, it should be balanced with the wisdom and experience of educators and parents. A collaborative approach that considers both student interests and long-term educational goals is likely to produce the best outcomes.
(Word count: 298)
Model Essay 3 (Band 6)
The topic of who should choose school subjects for students is important in education. Some people think students should pick their own subjects, while others believe teachers or parents should decide. This essay will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.
People who support student choice say it makes students more interested in learning. When students study subjects they like, they may work harder and get better grades. Also, choosing subjects helps students learn how to make decisions, which is good for their future. For example, if a student likes art, they might choose to study it and become a good artist later.
However, some people think teachers or parents should choose subjects for students. They say adults know more about what subjects are important for the future. Young people might choose easy subjects or ones that are not useful for their future jobs. Adults can make sure students learn all the important things they need to know.
I think the best way is to mix both ideas. Students should be able to choose some subjects they like, but they should also have to study some important subjects that adults choose. This way, students can learn things they enjoy and also get a good education for their future.
For example, schools could have some subjects that all students must take, like math and science. Then students could choose other subjects they like, such as art or music. Teachers and parents can help students make good choices by giving advice.
In conclusion, letting students choose some subjects and having adults choose others is a good idea. This helps students be happy with their studies and also prepares them well for the future.
(Word count: 267)
Teacher guiding student in subject choice
Explanation of Band Scores
Band 8 Essay:
- Task Response: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a well-developed response. Presents a clear position throughout the essay.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with clear progression. Uses a range of cohesive devices appropriately.
- Lexical Resource: Uses a wide range of vocabulary with very natural and sophisticated control of lexical features.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a wide range of structures with full flexibility and accuracy. Rare minor errors occur only as ‘slips’.
Band 7 Essay:
- Task Response: Addresses all parts of the task, presenting a clear position with some development and relevant ideas.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organizes information and ideas with a clear overall progression. Uses a range of cohesive devices effectively, but may have occasional inaccuracies.
- Lexical Resource: Uses a sufficient range of vocabulary to allow some flexibility and precision. Uses less common lexical items with some awareness of style and collocation.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a variety of complex structures with good control. Makes few errors that do not impede communication.
Band 6 Essay:
- Task Response: Addresses all parts of the task, though some parts may be more fully covered than others. Presents a relevant position, although conclusions may be unclear or repetitive.
- Coherence and Cohesion: Arranges information and ideas coherently and there is a clear overall progression. Uses cohesive devices effectively, but cohesion within and/or between sentences may be faulty or mechanical.
- Lexical Resource: Uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task. Attempts to use less common vocabulary but with some inaccuracy.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Uses a mix of simple and complex sentence forms. Makes some errors in grammar and punctuation but they rarely reduce communication.
Key Vocabulary to Remember
- Curriculum (noun) /kəˈrɪkjələm/ – The subjects comprising a course of study in a school or college
- Engage (verb) /ɪnˈɡeɪdʒ/ – Occupy, attract, or involve someone’s interest or attention
- Elective (noun) /ɪˈlektɪv/ – An optional course of study
- Framework (noun) /ˈfreɪmwɜːk/ – A basic structure underlying a system, concept, or text
- Implications (noun) /ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃ(ə)nz/ – The conclusion that can be drawn from something although it is not explicitly stated
- Comprehensive (adjective) /ˌkɒmprɪˈhensɪv/ – Including or dealing with all or nearly all elements or aspects of something
- Contention (noun) /kənˈtenʃ(ə)n/ – Heated disagreement
- Proponent (noun) /prəˈpəʊnənt/ – A person who advocates a theory, proposal, or project
- Fundamental (adjective) /ˌfʌndəˈment(ə)l/ – Forming a necessary base or core; of central importance
- Collaborative (adjective) /kəˈlæbərətɪv/ – Involving two or more parties working together
In conclusion, the topic of student curriculum choice is likely to remain relevant in future IELTS exams. Candidates should be prepared to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both student-led and adult-directed subject selection. Practice writing essays on similar topics, such as should students have the right to choose their subjects in high school or should physical education be mandatory in schools, to improve your skills. We encourage readers to try writing their own essays on this topic and share them in the comments section for feedback and discussion.