The topic of government-provided housing for the homeless is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2. Based on past exam trends and current social issues, this subject has a high probability of appearing in future tests. Let’s explore a relevant question that has been featured in recent IELTS exams and provide sample essays to help you prepare effectively.
Analyzing the Question
Some people think that governments should provide housing for people who cannot afford it themselves. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
This question asks for your opinion on whether governments should provide housing for those who can’t afford it. It’s crucial to:
- Clearly state your position
- Provide reasons and examples to support your view
- Consider potential counterarguments
- Conclude by restating your opinion
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)
Housing is a fundamental human need, and the question of whether governments should provide it for those who cannot afford it is a complex and contentious issue. While I acknowledge the arguments against such a policy, I strongly believe that governments should indeed provide housing assistance to those in need, albeit with certain conditions and limitations.
Firstly, providing housing for the less fortunate is a moral imperative for any compassionate society. Homelessness not only causes immense suffering for individuals but also leads to a host of societal problems, including increased crime rates, public health issues, and economic inefficiency. By ensuring that all citizens have access to basic shelter, governments can significantly improve overall social welfare and stability.
Moreover, government-provided housing can serve as a stepping stone for people to improve their situations. With a stable living environment, individuals are better positioned to seek employment, pursue education, and contribute positively to society. This, in turn, can lead to reduced dependency on government assistance in the long run, making it a sound investment for the future.
However, it is crucial to implement such programs carefully to avoid potential pitfalls. For instance, the quality and location of government-provided housing should be carefully considered to prevent the creation of isolated, low-income ghettos. Additionally, these programs should include incentives for recipients to work towards financial independence, such as time limits on assistance or requirements for job training and education.
Critics may argue that providing free housing is an unsustainable burden on taxpayers and may discourage personal responsibility. While these concerns are valid, I believe they can be addressed through thoughtful policy design. For example, housing assistance could be structured as a temporary measure with clear pathways to independence, rather than an indefinite entitlement.
In conclusion, while the implementation of government-provided housing requires careful consideration and planning, I firmly believe that the benefits to both individuals and society as a whole outweigh the potential drawbacks. By providing this basic necessity, governments can create a more equitable, stable, and prosperous society for all citizens.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)
The issue of whether governments should provide housing for people who can’t afford it is a difficult one. While there are good arguments on both sides, I mostly agree that governments should help with housing, but with some limits.
One main reason why I think governments should provide housing is that it helps people in need. Many people struggle to pay for a place to live, especially in big cities where rent is very high. If the government gives them a home, it can really improve their lives and help them get back on their feet. This is good for the whole society because it reduces homelessness and the problems that come with it.
Another reason is that having a stable home can help people find and keep jobs. If someone doesn’t have a place to live, it’s very hard for them to look presentable for job interviews or have a regular schedule. By providing housing, the government can help more people get jobs and support themselves.
However, I don’t think the government should just give free houses to everyone who can’t afford one. There should be some rules and limits. For example, people who get government housing should try to find work or improve their skills. The housing should also be for a limited time, not forever, so that people have a reason to try to afford their own homes eventually.
Some people might say that it’s not fair for the government to use taxpayer money to give free houses to some people. This is a good point, but I think if the program is done carefully, it can actually save money in the long run by reducing other costs like healthcare for homeless people or crime.
In conclusion, I mostly agree that governments should provide housing for those who can’t afford it, but with some conditions. It can help solve many social problems and give people a chance to improve their lives. However, it’s important to do it in a way that encourages people to become independent over time.
IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Essays
Key Points to Remember When Writing
Structure: Both essays follow a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The higher band essay has more sophisticated paragraph development.
Language: The Band 8-9 essay uses more advanced vocabulary and complex sentence structures, while the Band 6-7 essay uses simpler language but still maintains clarity.
Arguments: Both essays present arguments for and against government-provided housing, but the higher band essay explores the topic in more depth and with more nuanced reasoning.
Cohesion: The Band 8-9 essay uses a wider range of cohesive devices and transitions between ideas more smoothly.
Task Response: Both essays address the question directly, but the higher band essay provides a more comprehensive and balanced discussion of the issue.
Useful Vocabulary
- Contentious (adjective) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – causing or likely to cause disagreement
- Imperative (noun) /ɪmˈperətɪv/ – an essential or urgent thing
- Stepping stone (noun) /ˈstepɪŋ stəʊn/ – a circumstance that assists progress towards a goal
- Pitfall (noun) /ˈpɪtfɔːl/ – a hidden or unsuspected danger or difficulty
- Unsustainable (adjective) /ˌʌnsəˈsteɪnəbl/ – not able to be maintained at the current rate or level
- Entitlement (noun) /ɪnˈtaɪtlmənt/ – the fact of having a right to something
- Equitable (adjective) /ˈekwɪtəbl/ – fair and impartial
- Presentable (adjective) /prɪˈzentəbl/ – fit to be seen; decent
Conclusion
Writing about government-provided housing for the homeless requires a balanced approach, considering both the benefits and potential drawbacks of such policies. Practice writing essays on this topic, focusing on clear structure, varied vocabulary, and well-developed arguments. Remember to adapt your language complexity based on your target band score.
For further practice, consider writing essays on related topics such as:
- The role of charities vs. government in addressing homelessness
- Long-term solutions to urban housing shortages
- The impact of homelessness on society and the economy
Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section below for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you improve your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS Writing Task 2.