The topic of banning plastic packaging globally has become increasingly prevalent in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. This environmental issue has appeared multiple times in recent years, reflecting growing global concerns about plastic pollution. Based on this trend, we can expect similar questions to continue appearing in future IELTS tests. Let’s examine a relevant question that has been featured in past exams:

Some people think that a complete ban on plastic packaging is necessary to tackle plastic pollution. Others argue that there are more effective ways to deal with this problem. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

This question directly addresses the debate surrounding plastic packaging bans, making it an excellent example to analyze and practice with. Let’s break down the question and provide sample essays for different band scores.

Question Analysis

This question presents a balanced argument task, requiring candidates to:

1. Discuss the view that a complete ban on plastic packaging is necessary
2. Explore alternative methods to tackle plastic pollution
3. Provide their own opinion on the most effective approach

To excel in this task, candidates must address all parts of the question, provide relevant examples, and structure their essay logically.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Plastic pollution has become a global crisis, prompting debates on the most effective solutions. While some advocate for a complete ban on plastic packaging, others argue that alternative measures could be more impactful. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Proponents of a total ban on plastic packaging argue that this drastic measure is necessary to curb the overwhelming tide of plastic waste. They contend that by eliminating plastic packaging at the source, we can significantly reduce plastic pollution in our oceans, landfills, and ecosystems. For instance, countries like Rwanda and Kenya have implemented strict bans on plastic bags, resulting in cleaner cities and reduced environmental damage. This approach forces industries to innovate and develop sustainable packaging alternatives, potentially accelerating the transition to a more eco-friendly economy.

On the other hand, critics of a complete ban argue that there are more nuanced and effective ways to address plastic pollution. They suggest that a combination of measures, such as improved recycling infrastructure, consumer education, and incentives for sustainable packaging, could yield better results without causing economic disruption. For example, Norway’s bottle deposit scheme has achieved a 97% recycling rate for plastic bottles, demonstrating the potential of well-designed recycling programs. Additionally, advancements in biodegradable plastics and packaging made from renewable resources offer promising alternatives that could reduce environmental impact without necessitating a total ban.

In my opinion, while a complete ban on plastic packaging could have significant environmental benefits, a more balanced approach combining multiple strategies would be more effective and feasible. I believe that gradually phasing out single-use plastics, investing in recycling technology, and promoting sustainable alternatives can achieve substantial reductions in plastic pollution without causing undue economic hardship. This multifaceted approach allows for innovation and adaptation, potentially leading to more sustainable long-term solutions.

In conclusion, tackling plastic pollution requires a comprehensive strategy that goes beyond a simple ban. By implementing a combination of regulatory measures, technological innovations, and public awareness campaigns, we can address this critical environmental issue more effectively and sustainably.

(Word count: 329)

Global debate on plastic packaging ban

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

Plastic pollution is a big problem in the world today. Some people think we should ban all plastic packaging to solve this issue, while others believe there are better ways to deal with it. This essay will discuss both views and give my opinion.

Those who support a complete ban on plastic packaging say it’s the only way to stop plastic pollution. They think that if we don’t use plastic packaging at all, there will be less plastic waste in the environment. For example, some countries have banned plastic bags, and this has helped reduce litter in their cities. This approach also encourages companies to find new ways to package products without using plastic.

However, other people argue that there are more effective ways to tackle plastic pollution. They suggest that we should focus on recycling more, educating people about plastic waste, and developing new materials that are better for the environment. For instance, some countries have successful recycling programs that help reduce plastic waste. They also say that banning all plastic packaging might be difficult for businesses and could make some products more expensive.

In my opinion, I think a combination of different methods would work best to solve the plastic pollution problem. While banning some types of plastic packaging could be helpful, we also need to improve recycling, educate people, and develop new eco-friendly materials. This way, we can reduce plastic pollution without causing too many problems for businesses and consumers.

To conclude, plastic pollution is a complex issue that needs more than just one solution. By using a mix of methods, including some bans, better recycling, and new technologies, we can work towards a cleaner environment and a more sustainable future.

(Word count: 275)

Sample Essay 3 (Band 5-6)

Plastic pollution is a big problem today. Some people want to ban all plastic packaging, but others think there are better ways to fix this problem. I will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.

People who want to ban plastic packaging think it will stop pollution. They say if we don’t use plastic, there won’t be plastic in the oceans and on the streets. Some places have already banned plastic bags, and it has helped make their cities cleaner. This idea also makes companies find new ways to package things without plastic.

But other people think there are better ways to solve this problem. They say we should recycle more, teach people about plastic waste, and make new materials that are good for the environment. For example, some countries have good recycling programs that help reduce plastic waste. They also say that banning all plastic packaging might be hard for businesses and make things more expensive.

I think we should use different ways to solve the plastic problem. Banning some plastic is good, but we also need to recycle more and make new materials. This way, we can help the environment and not cause too many problems for people and businesses.

In conclusion, plastic pollution is a big problem that needs many solutions. We should use different ways to make our world cleaner and better for the future.

(Word count: 218)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay:

• Task Achievement: Fully addresses all parts of the task with a well-developed response.
• Coherence and Cohesion: Logically organized with clear progression throughout.
• Lexical Resource: Wide range of vocabulary used with flexibility and precision.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Wide range of structures used accurately and appropriately.

Band 6-7 Essay:

• Task Achievement: Addresses all parts of the task, though some aspects are more fully covered than others.
• Coherence and Cohesion: Information and ideas are generally well organized with clear overall progression.
• Lexical Resource: Sufficient range of vocabulary for the task, with some attempts at less common words.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Mix of simple and complex sentence forms with good control and few errors.

Band 5-6 Essay:

• Task Achievement: Addresses the task in a general way but may lack focus in parts.
• Coherence and Cohesion: Overall coherent but may lack overall progression.
• Lexical Resource: Limited range of vocabulary but adequate for basic communication.
• Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Limited range of structures with some attempt at complex sentences.

Should single-use plastic be banned worldwide is a topic closely related to the plastic packaging ban discussed in these essays. Understanding the broader context of plastic pollution can help candidates develop more comprehensive arguments in their writing.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

1. Plastic pollution (noun) – /ˈplæstɪk pəˈluːʃən/ – Environmental contamination by plastic materials
2. Ban (noun/verb) – /bæn/ – An official prohibition or to prohibit officially
3. Sustainable (adjective) – /səˈsteɪnəbəl/ – Able to be maintained at a certain rate or level
4. Biodegradable (adjective) – /ˌbaɪəʊdɪˈɡreɪdəbəl/ – Capable of being decomposed by bacteria or other living organisms
5. Recycling (noun) – /riːˈsaɪklɪŋ/ – The process of converting waste into reusable material
6. Innovation (noun) – /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃən/ – A new method, idea, product, etc.
7. Eco-friendly (adjective) – /ˈiːkəʊ ˈfrendli/ – Not harmful to the environment
8. Incentive (noun) – /ɪnˈsentɪv/ – A thing that motivates or encourages someone to do something
9. Phase out (phrasal verb) – /feɪz aʊt/ – To gradually stop using or providing something
10. Multifaceted (adjective) – /ˌmʌltɪˈfæsɪtɪd/ – Having many different aspects or features

Key vocabulary for IELTS Writing Task 2

In conclusion, the topic of banning plastic packaging globally is likely to remain relevant in future IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. To prepare effectively, candidates should practice writing balanced arguments, providing relevant examples, and expressing their opinions clearly. Additionally, they should consider related topics such as why plastic waste should be banned globally to broaden their understanding of the issue.

To further improve your writing skills, try composing your own essay on this topic and share it in the comments section below. This practice will help you apply the strategies and vocabulary discussed in this article, enhancing your preparation for the IELTS Writing Task 2.