IELTS Writing Task 2: Should There Be a Cap on Inheritance? Sample Essays and Analysis

Inheritance taxation and wealth distribution are recurring themes in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays. These topics often appear in various forms, reflecting their relevance to global economic policies and social equity debates. Based on past exam trends and the current socio-economic climate, we can expect questions related to inheritance caps to maintain a moderate frequency in future IELTS tests. Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:

Some people believe that inherited wealth should be capped at a certain amount, with the excess redistributed by the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

This question touches on the critical issue of wealth inequality and the role of government in economic redistribution. Let’s analyze the question and provide sample essays for different band scores.

Question Analysis

The question asks for your opinion on whether there should be a limit on the amount of wealth that can be inherited, with any excess being redistributed by the government. Key points to consider:

1. The concept of inherited wealth
2. The idea of capping inheritance at a certain amount
3. Government’s role in wealth redistribution
4. The potential impacts of such a policy on society and economy

Your response should clearly state your position and provide well-reasoned arguments to support it.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Inheritance has long been a cornerstone of wealth transfer between generations, but the growing wealth disparity in many societies has sparked debates about limiting inherited fortunes. While I acknowledge the intentions behind such proposals, I fundamentally disagree with the idea of capping inheritance and believe it could have unintended negative consequences.

Firstly, imposing a cap on inheritance infringes on individual property rights and the freedom to dispose of one’s assets as desired. This principle is a fundamental aspect of many democratic societies and market economies. Limiting this right could be seen as an overreach of government power and might discourage wealth creation and entrepreneurship. After all, many individuals work hard not just for their own benefit, but to secure a better future for their children and grandchildren.

Moreover, the implementation of such a policy could lead to unintended economic consequences. Wealthy individuals might find creative ways to circumvent the cap, such as transferring assets before death or moving wealth to jurisdictions with more favorable inheritance laws. This could result in capital flight and a decrease in domestic investment, potentially harming the overall economy. Additionally, family businesses, which often rely on intergenerational wealth transfer for continuity, might be forced to break up or sell, leading to job losses and economic disruption.

However, it is crucial to address the valid concerns about wealth inequality that motivate such proposals. Rather than capping inheritance, governments should focus on more equitable and effective means of wealth redistribution. This could include progressive taxation systems, investment in education and skills training, and policies that promote equal opportunities for all citizens. These approaches can help level the playing field without directly interfering with inheritance rights.

In conclusion, while the intention behind capping inheritance is understandable, I believe it is not the most effective or fair solution to address wealth inequality. Instead, governments should focus on creating comprehensive policies that promote economic opportunity and social mobility for all members of society. This approach can help achieve a more equitable distribution of wealth without compromising individual rights or economic dynamism.

[Word count: 332]

Inheritance Cap Debate: Economic Inequality Concept

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The idea of putting a limit on how much wealth can be inherited is a controversial topic. Some people think it’s a good way to reduce inequality, while others see it as unfair. In my opinion, while I understand the reasons for wanting to cap inheritance, I don’t fully agree with this approach.

One argument in favor of capping inheritance is that it could help reduce the gap between rich and poor. When very wealthy people pass on large fortunes to their children, it can make it harder for others to compete economically. By limiting how much can be inherited, the government could use the extra money to fund programs that help everyone, like education or healthcare.

However, there are several problems with this idea. Firstly, it might be seen as unfair to people who have worked hard to build wealth for their families. They might feel that the government is taking away their right to decide what happens to their money. Also, it could be difficult to enforce such a policy, as people might find ways to avoid it, like giving away money before they die.

Another issue is that capping inheritance could have negative effects on the economy. Many family businesses rely on passing wealth from one generation to the next. If inheritance is limited, these businesses might have to be sold or broken up, which could lead to job losses.

Instead of capping inheritance, I think there are better ways to address inequality. Governments could focus on improving education and job training programs to give more people the skills they need to succeed. They could also use tax policies to encourage wealthy people to donate to charities or invest in their communities.

In conclusion, while I understand the motivation behind wanting to cap inheritance, I don’t think it’s the best solution. There are other ways to reduce inequality that don’t involve such a direct intervention in people’s financial choices. By focusing on creating opportunities for everyone, we can work towards a fairer society without limiting inheritance.

[Word count: 329]

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay:

This essay demonstrates the characteristics of a high-scoring response:

1. Clear position: The writer clearly disagrees with the proposal and maintains this stance throughout.
2. Cohesive structure: The essay flows logically, with each paragraph developing a distinct point.
3. Advanced vocabulary: Uses sophisticated language accurately (e.g., “infringes on individual property rights”, “unintended economic consequences”).
4. Complex sentence structures: Employs a variety of sentence types and connecting devices.
5. Thorough development: Each main point is fully explained and supported with examples or logical reasoning.
6. Balanced view: Acknowledges the opposing viewpoint while maintaining a clear position.

Band 6-7 Essay:

This essay shows the features of a competent response, but with some limitations:

1. Clear overall position: The writer’s opinion is evident, though not as strongly maintained throughout.
2. Adequate structure: The essay has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, but transitions between ideas could be smoother.
3. Good vocabulary: Uses some less common words correctly, but not as consistently as the higher band essay.
4. Mix of sentence structures: Includes both simple and complex sentences, but with less variety than the Band 8-9 essay.
5. Relevant ideas: All points are on-topic, but some could be developed more fully.
6. Some balance: Considers different perspectives, though not as thoroughly as the higher band essay.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

1. Inheritance (noun) – /ɪnˈher.ɪ.təns/ – property or money received from someone who has died
2. Cap (verb) – /kæp/ – to put a limit on something
3. Redistribute (verb) – /ˌriː.dɪˈstrɪb.juːt/ – to share something out again in a different way
4. Wealth disparity (noun phrase) – /welθ dɪˈsper.ə.ti/ – the difference in the amount of money and possessions between different groups in society
5. Intergenerational (adjective) – /ˌɪn.tə.dʒenəˈreɪ.ʃən.əl/ – relating to relationships between people of different generations
6. Capital flight (noun phrase) – /ˈkæp.ɪ.təl flaɪt/ – the movement of large sums of money out of a country
7. Progressive taxation (noun phrase) – /prəˈɡres.ɪv tækˈseɪ.ʃən/ – a tax system where the tax rate increases as the taxable amount increases
8. Social mobility (noun phrase) – /ˈsəʊ.ʃəl məʊˈbɪl.ə.ti/ – the ability to move between different levels in society
9. Economic dynamism (noun phrase) – /ˌiː.kəˈnɒm.ɪk ˈdaɪ.nə.mɪ.zəm/ – the strength and potential for growth in an economy
10. Circumvent (verb) – /ˌsɜː.kəmˈvent/ – to find a way of avoiding a difficulty or rule

In conclusion, the topic of inheritance caps touches on complex issues of economic policy, social justice, and individual rights. While this specific question focuses on capping inheritance, related questions might explore broader themes of wealth distribution, taxation policies, or government intervention in economic affairs. To prepare for similar topics, consider practicing essays on:

1. The role of inheritance taxes in reducing wealth inequality
2. The impact of inherited wealth on social mobility
3. Government policies to promote economic equality without directly limiting inheritance

Remember, the key to success in IELTS Writing Task 2 is to present a clear, well-reasoned argument supported by relevant examples. Practice writing essays on these topics, and don’t hesitate to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you improve your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS exam.

The importance of wealth transfer planning for families is a crucial aspect to consider when discussing inheritance policies. Understanding these strategies can provide valuable insights into the complexities of wealth distribution and its long-term effects on families and society.