Site icon IELTS.NET

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Essays: Should Universities Offer Free Education for All Citizens? (Band 6-9)

Pros and cons of free university education

Pros and cons of free university education

The topic of free university education for all citizens is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on past exam trends and current global discussions on education accessibility, this subject is likely to appear frequently in future tests. Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:

Some people believe that university education should be free for all citizens. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

This question directly addresses the debate on whether higher education should be provided free of charge to all citizens. Let’s analyze the question and provide sample essays for different band scores.

Question Analysis

The question asks for your opinion on whether university education should be free for everyone. Key points to consider:

  1. The scope: “all citizens” – this implies a universal approach, not limited to specific groups.
  2. The extent of agreement: You need to clearly state your position and explain how much you agree or disagree.
  3. Implications: Consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of free university education for society and individuals.

The importance of early education in promoting equality is a related topic that may provide useful context for this discussion.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

Higher education has long been viewed as a gateway to better opportunities and societal progress. While some argue that university education should be free for all citizens, I partially disagree with this statement. Although making higher education freely accessible has its merits, I believe a more nuanced approach is necessary to ensure both quality and sustainability.

Undoubtedly, providing free university education could lead to a more educated populace and potentially reduce social inequalities. By removing financial barriers, talented individuals from all backgrounds would have the chance to pursue higher studies, thereby fostering social mobility and innovation. Moreover, a well-educated workforce could contribute significantly to a nation’s economic growth and competitiveness in the global market.

However, the implementation of free university education for all citizens presents several challenges. Firstly, the enormous cost of funding such a system would place a substantial burden on government budgets, potentially leading to higher taxes or reduced spending in other crucial areas such as healthcare or infrastructure. Secondly, without proper mechanisms in place, free education might lead to overcrowding in universities and a potential decline in educational quality due to limited resources being spread too thin.

A more balanced approach would be to offer targeted financial support to deserving students based on merit and need, while maintaining a reasonable fee structure for those who can afford it. This system could be complemented by expanding scholarship programs, implementing income-contingent loan schemes, and fostering public-private partnerships to enhance educational resources. Such a strategy would ensure that higher education remains accessible to talented individuals regardless of their financial background, while also maintaining the quality and sustainability of the educational system.

In conclusion, while the idea of free university education for all citizens is appealing, I believe a more nuanced approach is necessary to balance accessibility, quality, and financial sustainability. By implementing targeted support systems and innovative funding models, we can create an educational landscape that is both inclusive and excellence-driven.

(Word count: 309)

Pros and cons of free university education

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

The idea of free university education for all citizens is a topic that many people have strong opinions about. In my view, I partly agree with this statement because while it has some benefits, there are also significant drawbacks to consider.

On the positive side, free university education could give more people the chance to study and improve their skills. This is especially important for students from poor families who might not be able to afford high tuition fees. With free education, these students could have better job opportunities and earn more money in the future. Also, a country with more educated people might have a stronger economy and be able to compete better with other nations.

However, there are some problems with making university education free for everyone. The biggest issue is the cost. Governments would need to spend a lot of money to pay for all the teachers, buildings, and equipment needed for universities. This money would have to come from somewhere, probably through higher taxes. Another problem is that if university is free, too many people might want to attend, leading to overcrowded classrooms and not enough resources for everyone.

Should higher education be accessible to all citizens? This is a complex question that requires careful consideration of various factors.

I think a better solution would be to offer some financial help to students who really need it, but not make university completely free for everyone. For example, the government could give scholarships to top students or those from low-income families. They could also create programs where students can work part-time to pay for their education or take out loans that they pay back after graduating and finding a job.

In conclusion, while free university education for all citizens has some advantages, I believe the challenges it presents make it impractical. A more balanced approach that provides support to those who need it most while maintaining some costs for others seems like a better option.

(Word count: 309)

Sample Essay 3 (Band 5-6)

Some people think university education should be free for all citizens. I agree with this idea because it can help many people get better jobs and make the country stronger.

Free university education is good because it gives everyone a chance to study, not just rich people. If education is free, poor students can also go to university and learn new things. This is fair and can help reduce the gap between rich and poor people in society. Also, when more people can go to university, the country will have more skilled workers. This can help the country’s economy grow faster and compete with other countries.

However, making university education free for everyone might cause some problems. The biggest problem is money. The government will need to spend a lot of money to pay for all the costs of universities. This money has to come from somewhere, and it might mean higher taxes for everyone. Another problem is that if university is free, too many people might want to go. This could make classes too big and reduce the quality of education.

How to promote civic engagement through education is another important topic related to the role of education in society.

Even with these problems, I still think free university education is a good idea. The government can find ways to pay for it, like using money from other areas or asking rich people to pay more taxes. They can also make rules about who can go to university for free, so not everyone will go at the same time.

In conclusion, I agree that university education should be free for all citizens because it can help many people and make the country better. Although there are some difficulties, I believe the benefits are more important.

(Word count: 279)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay:

Band 6-7 Essay:

Band 5-6 Essay:

IELTS Writing Task 2 scoring criteria

Key Vocabulary

  1. Accessible (adj.) /əkˈsesəbl/ – able to be reached or entered
  2. Burden (n.) /ˈbɜːrdn/ – a heavy load or responsibility
  3. Contingent (adj.) /kənˈtɪndʒənt/ – dependent on or conditional upon
  4. Foster (v.) /ˈfɔːstər/ – encourage or promote the development of
  5. Implications (n.) /ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃnz/ – possible effects or results of an action
  6. Inequalities (n.) /ˌɪnɪˈkwɒlətiz/ – unfair differences between groups of people
  7. Nuanced (adj.) /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ – characterized by subtle differences
  8. Sustainability (n.) /səˌsteɪnəˈbɪləti/ – the ability to be maintained at a certain rate or level
  9. Targeted (adj.) /ˈtɑːrɡɪtɪd/ – aimed at a particular person or group
  10. Workforce (n.) /ˈwɜːrkfɔːrs/ – the people engaged in or available for work

Conclusion

The debate on whether universities should offer free education for all citizens is a complex and multifaceted issue. As demonstrated in the sample essays, there are valid arguments on both sides. While free education could increase accessibility and potentially boost economic growth, it also presents significant financial and logistical challenges.

For future IELTS Writing Task 2 preparation, consider practicing with similar topics such as:

  1. The role of government in funding higher education
  2. The impact of student debt on society
  3. Alternative models for financing university education
  4. The balance between vocational training and academic education

The benefits of public-private partnerships in education is another relevant topic that could provide valuable insights for your essays.

Remember to analyze the question carefully, present a clear position, and support your arguments with relevant examples and explanations. Practice writing essays on these topics and share them in the comments section below for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you improve your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS Writing Task 2.

Exit mobile version