Site icon IELTS.NET

IELTS Writing Task 2: Mastering Essays on Voting Rights for Younger Citizens (Band 7-9 Sample Essays Included)

Debate on voting rights for younger citizens

Debate on voting rights for younger citizens

The topic of extending voting rights to younger citizens has been a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 exams. Based on past trends and current socio-political discussions, it’s likely to appear in future tests as well. Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:

Some people think that the voting age should be lowered to 16. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Analyzing the Question

This question asks for your opinion on lowering the voting age to 16. It’s crucial to:

  1. Clearly state your position (agree, disagree, or partially agree)
  2. Provide well-reasoned arguments to support your stance
  3. Consider potential counterarguments
  4. Use relevant examples to illustrate your points

Now, let’s look at sample essays for different band scores.

Sample Essay 1 (Band 8-9)

In recent years, there has been a growing debate about whether the voting age should be lowered to 16. While some argue that this change would increase political engagement among youth, I firmly believe that the current voting age should be maintained for several compelling reasons.

Firstly, the age of 18 is widely recognized as the threshold of adulthood in many societies, marking the point at which individuals are deemed mature enough to make significant life decisions. This includes responsibilities such as joining the military, entering into legal contracts, and being tried as an adult in court. Voting, being a crucial civic duty that shapes the future of a nation, should be aligned with these other adult responsibilities. Lowering the voting age to 16 would create an inconsistency in our legal and social framework.

Moreover, at 16, most individuals are still in the process of forming their political views and understanding complex societal issues. The additional two years until 18 provide crucial time for intellectual and emotional development, allowing young people to gain a more nuanced understanding of political systems and their implications. This period often coincides with higher education or early work experiences, which can significantly broaden one’s perspective on societal issues.

Opponents of this view might argue that 16-year-olds are already engaged in political discussions, especially through social media, and should therefore have a say in elections. However, engagement does not necessarily equate to the level of critical thinking and long-term perspective required for informed voting decisions. The ability to participate in online debates does not guarantee a comprehensive understanding of economic policies, international relations, or the long-term consequences of political decisions.

Furthermore, there are more effective ways to foster political engagement among youth without lowering the voting age. Enhancing civic education in schools, promoting youth parliaments, and encouraging participation in local community initiatives can all contribute to political awareness and preparation for future voting responsibilities.

In conclusion, while the intention behind lowering the voting age is commendable, maintaining the current voting age of 18 ensures that voters have reached a level of maturity and understanding commensurate with this important civic duty. Instead of changing the voting age, efforts should be focused on better preparing young people for their future role as informed and responsible voters.

(Word count: 372)

Debate on voting rights for younger citizens

Essay Analysis (Band 8-9)

This essay demonstrates excellent qualities that align with Band 8-9 criteria:

  1. Task Response: The essay directly addresses the question, presenting a clear position against lowering the voting age. It provides well-developed arguments and considers counterarguments.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is logically structured with clear paragraphing. Ideas flow smoothly with appropriate use of linking words and phrases.

  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately. Complex ideas are expressed with precision.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: The essay showcases a variety of complex sentence structures with a high degree of accuracy. There are no noticeable errors.

  5. Critical Thinking: The essay demonstrates sophisticated reasoning, considering both the immediate and long-term implications of lowering the voting age.

Sample Essay 2 (Band 6-7)

There is a debate about whether the voting age should be lowered to 16. Some people think it’s a good idea, but I disagree with this for several reasons.

Firstly, at 16, most people are still in school and don’t have much experience of the real world. They might not understand complicated political issues or how government decisions affect different parts of society. It’s important for voters to have a good understanding of these things before they make decisions that affect everyone.

Secondly, 16-year-olds are still developing emotionally and mentally. They might be easily influenced by their friends, family, or social media, rather than making their own informed decisions. Voting requires careful thought and consideration, which comes with more maturity.

However, some argue that 16-year-olds are already working and paying taxes in some cases, so they should have a say in how the country is run. While this is true, working part-time jobs doesn’t necessarily give them enough experience to make informed political decisions.

Instead of lowering the voting age, I think we should focus on better educating young people about politics and how the government works. This could include more civics classes in schools and opportunities for young people to participate in mock elections or youth parliaments. This way, when they reach 18, they will be well-prepared to vote.

In conclusion, while it’s important to engage young people in politics, I believe that keeping the voting age at 18 is the right decision. It allows time for young people to gain the knowledge and maturity needed to make informed voting choices.

(Word count: 269)

Civics education in a high school classroom

Essay Analysis (Band 6-7)

This essay demonstrates qualities that align with Band 6-7 criteria:

  1. Task Response: The essay addresses the main parts of the task, presenting a clear position against lowering the voting age. However, the ideas could be more fully developed.

  2. Coherence and Cohesion: The essay is generally well-organized with clear progression throughout. Basic cohesive devices are used, but more sophisticated linking could improve the flow.

  3. Lexical Resource: There is a sufficient range of vocabulary, with some attempts at more sophisticated words. However, there’s room for more precise and varied language use.

  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence structures is used with general accuracy. There are no major errors that impede understanding.

  5. Critical Thinking: The essay presents logical arguments, but the depth of analysis could be improved with more specific examples or data.

Key Vocabulary

  1. Civic duty (noun) – /ˈsɪvɪk ˈdjuːti/ – The responsibilities of a citizen to their country or community.

  2. Nuanced (adjective) – /ˈnjuːɑːnst/ – Characterized by subtle shades of meaning or expression.

  3. Threshold (noun) – /ˈθreʃhəʊld/ – A point of entry or beginning.

  4. Engagement (noun) – /ɪnˈɡeɪdʒmənt/ – The act of participating or becoming involved in something.

  5. Implications (noun) – /ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃənz/ – The possible effects or results of an action or decision.

  6. Commendable (adjective) – /kəˈmendəbl/ – Deserving praise or approval.

  7. Perspective (noun) – /pəˈspektɪv/ – A particular way of considering something.

  8. Informed (adjective) – /ɪnˈfɔːmd/ – Having or showing knowledge or understanding of a subject.

Conclusion

The topic of extending voting rights to younger citizens is a complex and thought-provoking subject for IELTS Writing Task 2. It requires candidates to consider various aspects of citizenship, maturity, and political engagement. To prepare for similar topics, practice writing essays on related themes such as:

  1. The role of youth in political decision-making
  2. The impact of social media on young people’s political views
  3. The effectiveness of civic education in schools
  4. The balance between rights and responsibilities in citizenship

Remember, the key to success in IELTS Writing Task 2 is not just about agreeing or disagreeing, but presenting well-reasoned arguments supported by relevant examples. Practice writing your own essay on this topic and feel free to share it in the comments section for feedback and discussion. This active engagement will help you improve your writing skills and prepare effectively for the IELTS exam.

Exit mobile version