Censorship, a concept often intertwined with freedom of expression, frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2. It requires examinees to delve into its multifaceted implications on individuals and society. This essay will delve into the effects of censorship, providing a comprehensive analysis, a band-8 sample answer, and essential vocabulary for achieving a high score.
Sample IELTS Essay Question
Some people believe that governments should censor the internet to protect citizens from harmful content. Others argue that this censorship violates freedom of expression and is therefore unacceptable. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analysis of the Question
This question presents a classic argumentative essay structure, requiring you to:
- Discuss both views: Analyze the reasons why some support internet censorship and why others oppose it.
- Give your opinion: Clearly state your stance on whether internet censorship is justified.
Sample Essay
In an era defined by the pervasive reach of the internet, the question of censorship has ignited fervent debate. While some advocate for government intervention to shield citizens from harmful content, others contend that such measures infringe upon freedom of expression. This essay will explore both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.
Proponents of internet censorship argue that it is essential for safeguarding society. They posit that unfettered access to harmful content, such as hate speech, violent imagery, and misinformation, can have detrimental consequences for individuals and communities alike. Exposure to extremist ideologies, for instance, can incite violence and unrest, while the proliferation of fake news can undermine public trust and sow discord. By censoring such content, governments can ostensibly create a safer and more harmonious online environment.
Conversely, opponents of censorship argue that it constitutes a dangerous precedent that threatens the very foundations of a free and open society. They contend that censorship inevitably leads to the suppression of dissenting voices and the stifling of critical thought. Moreover, the subjective nature of “harmful content” raises concerns about the potential for abuse and the arbitrary application of censorship laws. Who decides what should be censored and on what grounds? Critics argue that such power should not be entrusted to governments, as it could easily be used to silence opposition and maintain control.
In my view, while the desire to protect citizens from harmful content is understandable, the potential risks of internet censorship far outweigh its perceived benefits. The slippery slope from censorship to outright repression is all too real, and history is replete with examples of governments abusing their power to silence dissent. Instead of resorting to censorship, a more effective approach would be to promote digital literacy, critical thinking skills, and responsible online behavior. By empowering individuals to navigate the digital landscape safely and responsibly, we can mitigate the risks of harmful content without resorting to draconian measures that undermine freedom of expression.
Word Count: 318
Writing Notes
- Structure: The essay follows a clear structure, addressing both sides of the argument before presenting a well-reasoned opinion.
- Vocabulary: The essay utilizes a range of vocabulary related to censorship and freedom of expression, such as “detrimental consequences,” “extremist ideologies,” “arbitrary application,” and “slippery slope.”
- Grammar: The essay demonstrates grammatical accuracy and complexity, using a variety of sentence structures and cohesive devices.
- Examples: The essay would be strengthened by including specific examples of censorship and its consequences.
Difficult Vocabulary
- Pervasive (adjective) /pəˈveɪsɪv/: Spreading widely throughout.
- Ignite (verb) /ɪɡˈnaɪt/: Arouse or excite (a feeling or response).
- Unfettered (adjective) /ʌnˈfɛtəd/: Not restricted or limited.
- Detrimental (adjective) /ˌdɛtrɪˈmɛnt(ə)l/: Causing harm or damage.
- Incite (verb) /ɪnˈsaɪt/: Encourage or stir up (violent or unlawful behavior).
- Discord (noun) /ˈdɪskɔːd/: Disagreement between people.
- Ostensibly (adverb) /ɒˈstɛnsɪbli/: Apparently or purportedly, but perhaps not actually.
- Precedent (noun) /ˈprɛsɪdənt/: An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.
- Stifling (verb) /ˈstaɪf(ə)lɪŋ/: Restrict (someone or something) in a way that prevents free action or development.
- Draconian (adjective) /drəˈkəʊnɪən/: Excessively harsh and severe.
Conclusion
Understanding the multifaceted effects of censorship is crucial for success in the IELTS Writing Task 2. By utilizing a clear structure, relevant vocabulary, and persuasive arguments, you can effectively address this complex issue and achieve a high band score. Remember to practice your writing skills and familiarize yourself with common IELTS topics to excel in your exam.