Genetic engineering in agriculture is a highly relevant topic that frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 examinations. Based on analysis of past IELTS tests from 2018-2023, questions about genetic modification in farming have appeared approximately 3-4 times per year, making it a significant theme that test-takers should be well-prepared for.
Ethical implications of genetic engineering? are often central to these types of questions. Let’s examine a recent IELTS task 2 question on this topic:
Some people think that genetic engineering should be used to develop crops that are resistant to diseases and pests. Others believe that genetic engineering in agriculture is dangerous and should be strictly controlled. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Analysis of the Question
This question requires candidates to:
- Discuss arguments for using genetic engineering in agriculture
- Examine concerns about its dangers
- Present and justify their own position
- Follow a balanced discussion format
Scientist examining genetically modified crops in modern laboratory
Sample Essay 1 (Band 8.5)
The genetic modification of agricultural crops has become a contentious issue, with some advocating for its use in creating resilient food sources while others warn of potential risks. In my opinion, while genetic engineering offers significant benefits, it requires careful regulation and oversight.
Those in favor of genetic engineering argue that it provides crucial solutions to global food security challenges. By developing crops that can withstand pests and diseases naturally, farmers can reduce their reliance on chemical pesticides while maintaining high yields. For instance, scientists have successfully created rice varieties that are resistant to certain fungi, potentially saving millions of tons of crops annually in Asia. Additionally, should genetically modified crops be encouraged to address growing food demands, as they can be engineered to provide enhanced nutritional content and better survival rates in harsh conditions.
However, critics raise valid concerns about the potential dangers of genetic modification. There are worries about unintended consequences on ecosystems, such as the possibility of modified genes spreading to wild plants or affecting beneficial insects. Furthermore, there are apprehensions about long-term health implications for consumers, despite current research indicating their safety. These concerns have led many to advocate for should there be regulations on genetic modification in agriculture.
In my view, genetic engineering in agriculture represents a powerful tool that, when properly regulated, can contribute significantly to global food security. However, implementation should proceed with caution, incorporating robust safety protocols and continuous monitoring. A balanced approach, combining scientific innovation with careful oversight, would best serve both agricultural advancement and public safety.
Sample Essay 2 (Band 6.5)
Nowadays, genetic engineering in farming is a big topic that people debate about. Some people think it is good while others worry about its dangers. I will discuss both sides and give my opinion.
On the positive side, genetic engineering can help farmers grow better crops. When plants are modified to fight diseases and insects, farmers don’t need to use so many chemicals. This is good for both the environment and food production. For example, in many countries, scientists have made crops that grow better in dry weather, which helps farmers save their harvests.
However, some people worry about the safety of genetic engineering. They think it might be dangerous for nature and human health. They worry that changed genes might spread to other plants or that eating modified food might not be safe. This is why they want strict rules about genetic engineering.
I think genetic engineering can be useful but we must be careful. We should have good rules to make sure it is safe. Scientists should keep studying its effects, and governments should check all modified crops carefully before allowing farmers to grow them.
Analysis of Band Scores
Band 8.5 Essay Analysis:
- Sophisticated vocabulary and complex structures
- Clear, logical organization
- Well-developed arguments with specific examples
- Effective use of cohesive devices
- Balanced discussion with clear position
Band 6.5 Essay Analysis:
- Simple but clear vocabulary
- Basic organization present
- Limited development of ideas
- Some cohesive devices used
- Position stated but not fully developed
Key Vocabulary
- Genetic modification (n.) /dʒəˈnetɪk ˌmɒdɪfɪˈkeɪʃən/ – The process of changing an organism’s DNA
- Resilient (adj.) /rɪˈzɪliənt/ – Able to withstand or recover from difficult conditions
- Contentious (adj.) /kənˈtenʃəs/ – Causing or likely to cause disagreement
- Implementation (n.) /ˌɪmplɪmenˈteɪʃən/ – The process of putting a plan into action
- Oversight (n.) /ˈəʊvəsaɪt/ – Supervision and monitoring
- Apprehension (n.) /ˌæprɪˈhenʃən/ – Anxiety or fear about the future
- Protocol (n.) /ˈprəʊtəkɒl/ – Official procedure or system of rules
Looking ahead, candidates should prepare for variations on this topic, such as:
- Economic impacts of genetic engineering in agriculture
- Environmental consequences of GM crops
- Food security and genetic modification
- Ethical considerations in agricultural biotechnology
We encourage readers to practice writing their own essays on this topic and share them in the comments section for feedback and discussion.
