Mastering IELTS Writing Task 2: Ethical Implications of Genetic Modification – Sample Essays and Analysis for Band 6-9

Genetic modification has become a hot topic in recent years, particularly in the context of agriculture and food production. This subject frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions, challenging test-takers to explore the ethical …

Ethical implications of genetic modification in agriculture

Genetic modification has become a hot topic in recent years, particularly in the context of agriculture and food production. This subject frequently appears in IELTS Writing Task 2 questions, challenging test-takers to explore the ethical implications of this controversial technology. Based on past exam trends and current global discussions, we can expect this theme to continue appearing in future IELTS tests.

Let’s examine a relevant question that has appeared in recent IELTS exams:

Some people think that the use of genetic engineering to create new plants and animals is a positive development, while others believe it is too dangerous. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analyzing the Question

This question requires candidates to:

  1. Discuss the positive aspects of genetic engineering in creating new plants and animals.
  2. Explore the potential dangers or negative implications of this technology.
  3. Provide a balanced argument considering both viewpoints.
  4. Present their own opinion on the matter.

Sample Essays for Different Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay Sample

Genetic engineering, a groundbreaking field of science, has sparked intense debate regarding its application in creating new plants and animals. While proponents argue that it offers unprecedented opportunities for agricultural advancement and food security, critics warn of potential risks to human health and the environment. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Those in favor of genetic engineering emphasize its potential to revolutionize agriculture and food production. By modifying plant and animal genes, scientists can develop crops with enhanced nutritional value, increased yield, and resistance to pests and diseases. For instance, golden rice, fortified with vitamin A, could potentially alleviate malnutrition in developing countries. Moreover, genetically modified livestock could produce more meat or milk, helping to meet the growing global demand for food. These advancements could significantly contribute to addressing world hunger and improving food security.

On the other hand, opponents of genetic engineering raise valid concerns about its potential dangers. One primary worry is the unknown long-term effects on human health and the environment. Critics argue that consuming genetically modified organisms (GMOs) may lead to unforeseen allergic reactions or other health issues. Additionally, there are fears that genetically modified crops could cross-pollinate with wild plants, potentially disrupting ecosystems and biodiversity. The ethical implications of altering nature’s genetic codes also raise philosophical questions about humanity’s role in manipulating life forms.

In my opinion, while genetic engineering offers promising solutions to global challenges, it must be approached with caution and rigorous scientific scrutiny. I believe that the potential benefits of this technology are too significant to ignore, particularly in the face of climate change and population growth. However, strict regulations and extensive long-term studies are crucial to ensure the safety of GMOs for both human consumption and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, transparent labeling of genetically modified products is essential to allow consumers to make informed choices.

In conclusion, genetic engineering presents both opportunities and risks in the creation of new plants and animals. While it has the potential to address pressing global issues, careful consideration of its ethical implications and potential dangers is paramount. Moving forward, a balanced approach that harnesses the benefits of genetic engineering while mitigating its risks through robust scientific research and regulation is essential for responsible progress in this field.

(Word count: 374)

Ethical implications of genetic modification in agricultureEthical implications of genetic modification in agriculture

Band 6-7 Essay Sample

Genetic engineering is a controversial topic that has both supporters and critics. Some people think it’s a good way to make new plants and animals, while others worry it might be dangerous. This essay will look at both sides of the argument and give my opinion.

Those who support genetic engineering say it can help solve many problems. For example, scientists can create crops that grow better and resist diseases. This could help feed more people, especially in poor countries where food is scarce. Also, they can make animals that produce more meat or milk, which could help meet the growing demand for food as the world’s population increases.

However, there are also people who think genetic engineering is too risky. They worry that eating genetically modified foods might be bad for our health, even if we don’t know it yet. Another concern is that genetically modified plants might spread their genes to wild plants, which could harm nature and wildlife. Some people also think it’s morally wrong to change the genes of living things.

In my opinion, genetic engineering can be useful, but we need to be careful about how we use it. I think the benefits, like making more food for hungry people, are important. But we should also do a lot of research to make sure it’s safe for people and the environment. It’s also important to label genetically modified foods so people can choose whether they want to eat them or not.

To conclude, genetic engineering has both good and bad points. While it could help solve some big problems, we need to be careful and think about the possible risks. I believe we should continue to study and use genetic engineering, but with strict rules and lots of testing to keep everyone safe.

(Word count: 294)

Band 5-6 Essay Sample

Genetic engineering is a new way to make plants and animals. Some people think it’s good, but others think it’s dangerous. I will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.

People who like genetic engineering say it can help make more food. Scientists can make plants that grow better and don’t get sick easily. This can help poor countries have more food. They can also make animals that give more meat or milk. This is good because more people need food as the world gets more people.

But some people don’t like genetic engineering. They think it might be bad for our health if we eat food from genetically changed plants or animals. They also worry that these new plants might hurt other plants in nature. Some people think it’s not right to change how animals and plants are made.

I think genetic engineering can be good, but we need to be careful. It’s important to make more food for people who don’t have enough. But we should also make sure it’s safe for people to eat and doesn’t hurt nature. I think we should keep studying genetic engineering but have strict rules about how to use it.

In conclusion, genetic engineering has good and bad points. It can help make more food, but it might also be dangerous. I think we should use it carefully and keep checking to make sure it’s safe.

(Word count: 228)

Pros and cons of genetic modification in agriculturePros and cons of genetic modification in agriculture

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay:

This essay demonstrates excellent writing skills and a comprehensive understanding of the topic. It effectively addresses all parts of the question, providing a well-balanced discussion of both viewpoints and a clear personal opinion. The essay uses a wide range of vocabulary and complex sentence structures accurately. It also includes specific examples (e.g., golden rice) to support arguments. The coherent organization and sophisticated use of cohesive devices contribute to its high band score.

Band 6-7 Essay:

This essay covers the main points required by the question but with less depth and sophistication compared to the Band 8-9 essay. It presents a clear structure with introduction, body paragraphs discussing both views, and a conclusion with the writer’s opinion. The language used is generally clear, though less varied and precise than the higher band essay. There are some attempts at using more complex structures, but they are not always successful. The essay demonstrates a good understanding of the topic but lacks the nuanced analysis seen in higher band responses.

Band 5-6 Essay:

This essay addresses the basic requirements of the task but in a simpler and more limited way. The language used is mostly simple and repetitive, with few attempts at more complex structures. While it covers both viewpoints and includes a personal opinion, the ideas are not fully developed, and there’s a lack of specific examples or detailed explanations. The organization is clear but basic, and cohesive devices are limited. This essay shows an understanding of the topic but lacks the depth and language sophistication required for higher bands.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Genetic engineering (noun) – /dʒəˈnetɪk ˌendʒɪˈnɪərɪŋ/ – The manipulation of an organism’s genes using biotechnology.

  2. Ethical implications (noun phrase) – /ˈeθɪkəl ˌɪmplɪˈkeɪʃənz/ – The moral consequences or issues arising from a particular action or policy.

  3. Biodiversity (noun) – /ˌbaɪəʊdaɪˈvɜːsəti/ – The variety of plant and animal life in the world or in a particular habitat.

  4. Cross-pollinate (verb) – /krɒs ˈpɒlɪneɪt/ – To pollinate a plant or crop with pollen from another variety or species.

  5. GMO (Genetically Modified Organism) (noun) – /ˌdʒiː em ˈəʊ/ – An organism whose genetic material has been altered using genetic engineering techniques.

  6. Food security (noun phrase) – /fuːd sɪˈkjʊərəti/ – The state of having reliable access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food.

  7. Scrutiny (noun) – /ˈskruːtəni/ – Critical observation or examination.

  8. Malnutrition (noun) – /ˌmælnjuːˈtrɪʃən/ – Lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat or not eating enough of the right things.

  9. Ecosystem (noun) – /ˈiːkəʊˌsɪstəm/ – A biological community of interacting organisms and their physical environment.

  10. Fortified (adjective) – /ˈfɔːtɪfaɪd/ – (Of food or drink) Having had vitamins or other substances added to it in order to increase its nutritional value.

In conclusion, The Ethical Implications Of Genetic Modification remain a relevant and challenging topic in IELTS Writing Task 2. As you prepare for your exam, consider practicing with similar questions that explore the balance between scientific progress and ethical concerns. Some potential future topics might include:

  1. The role of government regulation in genetic engineering research
  2. The impact of genetically modified crops on small-scale farmers
  3. The ethical considerations of gene editing in human embryos

We encourage you to practice writing essays on these topics and share them in the comments section below. This exercise will not only help you improve your writing skills but also engage in meaningful discussions about this important global issue.