In recent years, the role of public policy in addressing global inequality has become an increasingly popular topic in IELTS Writing Task 2. This theme frequently appears in exams, reflecting its relevance in today’s interconnected world. Based on past trends and current global concerns, it’s highly likely that test-takers will encounter questions related to this subject in future IELTS examinations. Let’s explore a sample question and dissect how to craft compelling essays on this crucial issue.
Analyzing the Question
Some people believe that governments should focus on reducing economic inequality between nations, while others argue that domestic issues should be the priority. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
This question presents a classic IELTS dilemma, asking candidates to consider two contrasting viewpoints on government priorities. It’s essential to:
- Discuss arguments for prioritizing global economic inequality
- Present reasons for focusing on domestic issues
- Provide a balanced personal opinion
Let’s examine two sample essays addressing this prompt, one aimed at a Band 8-9 score and another at a Band 6-7 level.
Public policy addressing global inequality
Sample Essay for Band 8-9
In an increasingly interconnected world, the debate over whether governments should prioritize reducing global economic disparities or focus on domestic issues has gained significant traction. While both perspectives have merit, I believe that a balanced approach, addressing both international and national concerns, is crucial for sustainable development and global stability.
Proponents of focusing on global economic inequality argue that in our interconnected world, the prosperity of one nation inevitably affects others. They contend that by reducing the economic gap between countries, we can create a more stable global economy, reduce conflict, and address issues like mass migration. Furthermore, tackling global inequality can lead to expanded markets for all nations, fostering mutual growth and prosperity. This view aligns with the concept of global citizenship and the idea that in the long run, a rising tide lifts all boats.
On the other hand, those who advocate for prioritizing domestic issues argue that a government’s primary responsibility is to its own citizens. They believe that addressing internal problems such as unemployment, healthcare, and education should take precedence. This perspective emphasizes that a strong domestic foundation is necessary before a country can effectively contribute to global issues. Moreover, they argue that by solving internal problems, countries become better equipped to assist others, creating a positive ripple effect on the global stage.
In my opinion, the most effective approach lies in striking a balance between these two perspectives. Governments should recognize that domestic and international issues are often intertwined. For instance, investing in education and healthcare at home can create a workforce capable of competing globally, thus indirectly addressing international economic disparities. Similarly, participating in global economic initiatives can bring new opportunities and resources to address domestic challenges.
A balanced strategy could involve allocating resources to both domestic and international initiatives, with the proportion adjusted based on the country’s current economic status and global position. Developed nations might focus more on international aid and global economic policies, while developing countries could prioritize building robust domestic infrastructure and economies, gradually increasing their global contributions as they progress.
In conclusion, while the debate between global and domestic priorities is complex, the most effective public policy approach is one that recognizes their interdependence. By addressing both fronts simultaneously, governments can create a sustainable path to reducing inequality both within and between nations, fostering a more stable and prosperous global community.
(Word count: 379)
Sample Essay for Band 6-7
The question of whether governments should focus on reducing global economic inequality or prioritize domestic issues is a complex one. Both viewpoints have their merits, and in this essay, I will discuss both perspectives before giving my own opinion.
Those who believe governments should focus on reducing economic inequality between nations argue that in our globalized world, the economic health of one country affects others. They say that by helping poorer countries develop, we can create a more stable world economy. This could lead to benefits for everyone, such as more trade opportunities and fewer conflicts. Additionally, reducing global inequality might help solve problems like illegal immigration, as people would have better opportunities in their home countries.
On the other hand, many people think that domestic issues should be the priority for governments. They argue that a government’s main job is to take care of its own citizens first. This means focusing on local problems like unemployment, healthcare, and education. Supporters of this view believe that a country needs to be strong internally before it can effectively help other nations. They also point out that voters elect governments to solve local problems, not global ones.
In my opinion, both global and domestic issues are important, but I believe that governments should primarily focus on domestic issues. While helping other countries is noble, I think a government’s first responsibility is to its own citizens. By solving internal problems and building a strong economy at home, countries can then be in a better position to help others internationally. However, I also believe that completely ignoring global issues is not wise in today’s interconnected world.
To conclude, while reducing global economic inequality is important, I believe governments should prioritize domestic issues. This approach can lead to stronger individual countries, which can then contribute more effectively to solving global problems in the long run.
(Word count: 309)
Key Writing Tips
When addressing this topic in IELTS Writing Task 2, consider the following:
- Structure: Ensure a clear introduction, body paragraphs discussing both viewpoints, and a conclusion with your opinion.
- Balance: Present both sides of the argument fairly before giving your opinion.
- Examples: Use specific examples to support your points. For Band 8-9, these should be more sophisticated and varied.
- Coherence: Use appropriate linking words to connect ideas smoothly.
- Vocabulary: Employ a range of relevant vocabulary. Band 8-9 essays should demonstrate more advanced and precise language use.
Grammar and Vocabulary Notes
For Band 6-7:
- Use a mix of simple and complex sentences.
- Employ common academic phrases like “On the other hand,” “In conclusion,” etc.
- Use topic-specific vocabulary correctly.
For Band 8-9:
- Demonstrate a wider range of complex sentence structures.
- Use less common academic phrases and transitions.
- Incorporate more sophisticated vocabulary and idiomatic expressions.
Essential Vocabulary
Economic disparity (noun) /ɪkəˈnɒmɪk dɪˈspærəti/: Significant difference in economic well-being between individuals or groups.
Globalization (noun) /ˌɡləʊbəlaɪˈzeɪʃən/: The process of businesses or organizations developing international influence or operations.
Sustainable development (noun phrase) /səˈsteɪnəbl dɪˈveləpmənt/: Economic development conducted without depletion of natural resources.
Interconnected (adjective) /ˌɪntəkəˈnektɪd/: Mutually joined or related.
Domestic policy (noun phrase) /dəˈmestɪk ˈpɒləsi/: Government actions, laws, and decisions that affect the internal affairs of a nation.
Foreign aid (noun phrase) /ˈfɒrɪn eɪd/: Financial or material assistance given by one country to another.
Wealth distribution (noun phrase) /welθ ˌdɪstrɪˈbjuːʃən/: The way in which wealth is allocated between individuals in a group or society.
Socioeconomic (adjective) /ˌsəʊsioʊˌiːkəˈnɒmɪk/: Relating to or concerned with the interaction of social and economic factors.
Fiscal policy (noun phrase) /ˈfɪskəl ˈpɒləsi/: Government policy relating to taxation, spending, and borrowing.
Welfare state (noun phrase) /ˈwelfeə steɪt/: A system where the government undertakes to protect the health and well-being of its citizens.
Conclusion
The role of public policy in addressing global inequality is a complex and frequently examined topic in IELTS Writing Task 2. By understanding the key arguments, structuring your essay effectively, and using appropriate vocabulary, you can craft a compelling response to such questions. Remember to practice writing essays on similar topics, such as the role of government in fostering innovation or the effects of inflation on public investment, to enhance your skills further.
For additional practice, try writing an essay on the following related topics:
- The impact of international trade agreements on global economic equality.
- The role of education in reducing economic disparities between nations.
- How technology can be used to address global inequality.
We encourage you to write your own essay based on the prompt provided in this article and share it in the comments section. This practice will help you refine your writing skills and receive valuable feedback from others preparing for the IELTS exam.