Site icon IELTS.NET

Why Governments Should Fund Scientific Research: IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Essays and Analysis

Government Funded Research

Government Funded Research

Scientific research plays a crucial role in advancing human knowledge and improving our quality of life. The topic of government funding for scientific research is a recurring theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays, appearing frequently in past exams and likely to continue as a significant subject in future tests. This article will provide sample essays and in-depth analysis to help you prepare for this important topic.

Let’s examine a relevant IELTS Writing Task 2 question that has appeared in recent exams:

Some people think that governments should spend money on scientific research, while others believe that this money should be spent on other important things. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Analyzing the Question

This question requires you to:

  1. Discuss arguments for government funding of scientific research
  2. Discuss arguments against government funding of scientific research (in favor of other priorities)
  3. Provide your own opinion on the matter

Remember to address all parts of the question and provide a balanced discussion before stating your personal view.

Sample Essays

Band 8-9 Essay

Scientific research is undoubtedly a cornerstone of human progress, and the debate over its funding by governments is a topic of considerable importance. While some argue that government resources should be allocated to scientific endeavors, others contend that these funds could be better spent on more pressing matters. In my opinion, governments should prioritize funding for scientific research, as it leads to long-term benefits that outweigh short-term costs.

Proponents of government funding for scientific research argue that it is essential for societal advancement. Groundbreaking discoveries in medicine, technology, and environmental science often stem from government-funded research projects. For instance, the development of vaccines, which have saved countless lives, is frequently the result of government-sponsored studies. Moreover, government funding allows for the pursuit of research that may not have immediate commercial applications but could lead to revolutionary breakthroughs in the future.

On the other hand, those who oppose government funding for scientific research contend that there are more urgent needs that require immediate attention. They argue that resources should be directed towards addressing pressing issues such as poverty, healthcare, and education. These individuals believe that tangible improvements in people’s daily lives should take precedence over abstract scientific pursuits. Additionally, they may argue that private sector funding can adequately support scientific research without burdening taxpayers.

In my view, while addressing immediate societal needs is important, investing in scientific research is crucial for long-term progress and problem-solving. Government funding ensures that research is conducted in the public interest, rather than being solely driven by profit motives. Furthermore, many of today’s most pressing issues, such as climate change and disease prevention, can only be effectively addressed through scientific advancements. By supporting research, governments can foster innovation and create solutions that benefit society as a whole.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I believe that government funding for scientific research is essential. The potential for scientific discoveries to revolutionize our world and address global challenges far outweighs the short-term costs. By investing in research, governments can pave the way for a brighter, more sustainable future for all.

(Word count: 345)

Government Funded Research

Band 6-7 Essay

The question of whether governments should spend money on scientific research or other important things is a topic of debate. Some people think scientific research is very important and should get government money, while others believe there are more important things to spend on. I will discuss both views and give my opinion.

People who support government funding for scientific research say it is necessary for progress. Scientific discoveries can help solve big problems like diseases and environmental issues. For example, government-funded research has led to new medicines and technologies that improve our lives. Also, some important research might not happen without government support because it doesn’t make money right away.

On the other hand, those who think governments should spend money on other things argue that there are more urgent needs. They say that problems like poverty, healthcare, and education need immediate attention. These people believe that helping people’s lives right now is more important than scientific research that might take a long time to show results. They also think that private companies can pay for scientific research instead of the government.

In my opinion, I think governments should spend money on both scientific research and other important things. Scientific research is very important for long-term progress and solving big problems. But we also need to take care of immediate needs like healthcare and education. Governments should try to balance both, because scientific research can actually help solve some of these immediate problems in the long run.

To conclude, while there are good reasons for both views, I believe that government funding for scientific research is necessary, but it should be balanced with spending on other important areas. By doing this, we can address current needs while also investing in our future.

(Word count: 292)

Band 5-6 Essay

Some people think governments should give money for scientific research, but others think this money should be used for other important things. I will talk about both ideas and give my opinion.

People who want governments to pay for scientific research say it is very important. Scientific research can help us find new medicines and solve big problems. For example, research can help us fight diseases and find new ways to make energy. This can make life better for everyone.

But other people think governments should use money for other things. They say there are more important problems to fix now. They want to use money for things like schools, hospitals, and helping poor people. These things can help people right away, which they think is more important than scientific research that might take a long time to help.

I think both ideas are good, but I agree more that governments should pay for scientific research. Research can help us solve big problems in the future. Even if it takes time, it can make big changes that help everyone. But I also think governments should still spend some money on other important things too.

In conclusion, I believe governments should give money for scientific research because it can help us a lot in the future. But they should also use some money for other important things that people need now.

(Word count: 218)

Explanation of Band Scores

Band 8-9 Essay Explanation

This essay demonstrates excellent writing skills and a sophisticated approach to the topic:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay fully addresses all parts of the task, providing a balanced discussion of both views and a clear personal opinion.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are logically organized with clear progression. Paragraphs are well-linked, and cohesive devices are used effectively.
  3. Lexical Resource: A wide range of vocabulary is used accurately and appropriately. Complex ideas are expressed precisely.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A wide range of structures is used flexibly and accurately. Errors are rare and minor.

Band 6-7 Essay Explanation

This essay shows good writing skills but lacks some of the sophistication of the higher band essay:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses all parts of the task, but the discussion and opinion are less developed than in the Band 8-9 essay.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: Ideas are generally well-organized, but there’s less sophisticated use of cohesive devices.
  3. Lexical Resource: A sufficient range of vocabulary is used, but it’s less precise and varied than in the higher band essay.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A mix of simple and complex sentence forms is used, with some errors that don’t impede communication.

Band 5-6 Essay Explanation

This essay demonstrates basic writing skills but has limitations:

  1. Task Achievement: The essay addresses the task, but the discussion is limited and the opinion is not fully developed.
  2. Coherence and Cohesion: There’s a basic structure, but paragraphing and linking could be improved.
  3. Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is limited but adequate for the task. There’s less precision in word choice.
  4. Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Mostly simple sentences are used, with some attempts at complex structures. Errors are more frequent but don’t significantly impede communication.

Key Vocabulary to Remember

  1. Scientific research (noun) – /ˌsaɪənˈtɪfɪk rɪˈsɜːrtʃ/ – Systematic investigation to establish facts and reach new conclusions in science.

  2. Government funding (noun phrase) – /ˈɡʌvərnmənt ˈfʌndɪŋ/ – Financial support provided by the government for various projects or initiatives.

  3. Groundbreaking (adjective) – /ˈɡraʊndˌbreɪkɪŋ/ – Innovative; pioneering.

  4. Societal advancement (noun phrase) – /səˈsaɪətl ədˈvænsmənt/ – Progress or improvement in social conditions.

  5. Pressing issues (noun phrase) – /ˈpresɪŋ ˈɪʃuːz/ – Urgent matters that require immediate attention.

  6. Long-term progress (noun phrase) – /ˌlɔːŋ ˈtɜːrm ˈprəʊɡres/ – Advancement or improvement over an extended period.

  7. Innovation (noun) – /ˌɪnəˈveɪʃn/ – The introduction of new ideas, methods, or products.

  8. Sustainable (adjective) – /səˈsteɪnəbl/ – Able to be maintained at a certain level without depleting natural resources.

  9. Revolutionize (verb) – /ˌrevəˈluːʃənaɪz/ – To change something radically or fundamentally.

  10. Public interest (noun phrase) – /ˈpʌblɪk ˈɪntrəst/ – The welfare or well-being of the general public.

Conclusion

The topic of government funding for scientific research is likely to remain a significant theme in IELTS Writing Task 2 essays. By understanding the key arguments and practicing with sample essays like those provided, you can improve your ability to address this topic effectively.

To further enhance your skills, try writing your own essay on this topic or related ones, such as:

  1. Should space exploration be funded by governments or private companies?
  2. Is it more important for governments to fund pure scientific research or applied research?
  3. How can governments balance funding for scientific research with other societal needs?

Remember to practice regularly and focus on improving your task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy. Feel free to share your practice essays in the comments section for feedback and discussion with other learners.

For more insights on related topics, you might find these articles helpful:

Good luck with your IELTS preparation!

Exit mobile version